nuisance tax

简明释义

小额消费品税［美国］

英英释义

例句

1.Many residents are frustrated by the nuisance tax that seems to target small businesses unfairly.

许多居民对这项似乎不公平地针对小企业的滋扰税感到沮丧。

2.The introduction of the nuisance tax led to protests from local business owners.

引入滋扰税导致当地商家发起抗议。

3.Some citizens argue that the nuisance tax is just a way for the government to collect more money.

一些公民认为滋扰税只是政府收集更多资金的一种方式。

4.The local government introduced a new nuisance tax to address the rising costs of public services.

地方政府引入了一项新的滋扰税来应对公共服务成本的上升。

5.The city council debated whether the nuisance tax was an effective way to generate revenue.

市议会辩论了滋扰税是否是产生收入的有效方式。

作文

In the realm of taxation, various terms and concepts often arise that can confuse the general public. One such term is nuisance tax, which refers to a tax that is perceived as more of an annoyance than a significant source of revenue for the government. This type of tax is usually imposed on activities that are considered undesirable or bothersome, such as certain fees related to parking violations, littering, or even the sale of specific goods. While these taxes may seem trivial, they can accumulate and serve as a financial burden for individuals and businesses alike. The concept of nuisance tax can be understood better when we consider its implications on society. For instance, when a local government imposes a fee for not adhering to parking regulations, it may be seen as a way to discourage illegal parking. However, many people view this as a money-making scheme rather than a genuine effort to improve public order. This perception can lead to frustration among citizens who feel targeted by these small but frequent charges. Moreover, the effectiveness of nuisance tax in achieving its intended goals can be debated. For example, if a city decides to implement a tax on plastic bags to reduce littering, one might argue that while the intention is noble, the execution could be flawed. Many consumers may simply choose to pay the tax rather than change their behavior, thereby undermining the purpose of the tax itself. This raises questions about whether such taxes truly contribute to societal improvement or merely serve as a financial inconvenience. Another aspect to consider is how nuisance tax can disproportionately affect low-income individuals. For someone struggling to make ends meet, the accumulation of small fees can become overwhelming. A parking ticket here, a littering fine there, and soon enough, these charges add up to a significant expense. This reality highlights the need for governments to carefully evaluate the fairness and impact of such taxes on different socioeconomic groups. In conclusion, while the idea of nuisance tax may seem trivial at first glance, it carries deeper implications for both individuals and society as a whole. It raises important questions about the role of government in regulating behavior, the effectiveness of such measures, and the fairness of imposing additional financial burdens on citizens. As we continue to navigate the complexities of taxation, it is crucial to engage in thoughtful discussions about the necessity and impact of these types of taxes. Only then can we ensure that our tax systems serve their intended purposes without becoming a source of frustration for the very people they aim to regulate.

在税收领域，许多术语和概念常常让公众感到困惑。其中一个术语是nuisance tax，指的是被认为更多是一种烦恼而不是政府重要收入来源的税。这种类型的税通常会对被视为不受欢迎或令人厌烦的活动征收，例如与停车违规、乱扔垃圾，甚至某些商品销售相关的费用。虽然这些税看似微不足道，但它们可以积累起来，成为个人和企业的经济负担。当我们考虑nuisance tax对社会的影响时，可以更好地理解这个概念。例如，当地方政府对未遵守停车规定的人征收罚款时，这可能被视为一种阻止非法停车的方式。然而，许多人将其视为一种赚钱的手段，而不是改善公共秩序的真正努力。这种看法可能导致市民感到沮丧，因为他们觉得自己被这些小但频繁的收费所针对。此外，nuisance tax在实现其预期目标方面的有效性也值得讨论。例如，如果一个城市决定对塑料袋征税以减少垃圾，那么人们可能会争辩，虽然意图是高尚的，但执行可能存在缺陷。许多消费者可能只是选择支付税款，而不是改变他们的行为，从而削弱了税收本身的目的。这引发了关于这些税是否真正有助于社会改善，还是仅仅作为一种经济不便的质疑。另一个需要考虑的方面是，nuisance tax可能对低收入个体产生不成比例的影响。对于那些艰难维持生计的人来说，小额费用的累积可能变得压倒性。这里一张停车罚单，那边一项乱扔垃圾的罚款，不久之后，这些费用就累积成一笔可观的开支。这一现实突显了政府需要仔细评估这些税收对不同社会经济群体的公平性和影响。总之，尽管nuisance tax的概念乍一看似乎微不足道，但它对个人和整个社会的影响更为深远。它提出了关于政府在规范行为方面的角色、此类措施的有效性以及对公民施加额外经济负担的公平性的重要问题。在我们继续应对税收的复杂性时，进行关于这些税种的必要性和影响的深入讨论至关重要。只有这样，我们才能确保我们的税制能够实现其预期目的，而不至于成为它们旨在规范的人的挫折来源。