conflation

简明释义

英[kənˈfleɪʃn]美[kənˈfleɪʃn]

n. 合并；异文合成本

复 数 c o n f l a t i o n s

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.This savings is called conflation.

（这种节省称为合并）。

2.This is an interesting observation, but it's a conflation of software and templates.

有趣的观察，不过作者混淆了软件与模版这两个概念。

3.OCLC certainly didn't invent it, but I think one must get past the over-simplification and conflation quickly in order to take a productive approach to such a large and diverse region.

这个词当然不是OCLC发明的，但是我想你必须迅速摆脱这种过分简化的说法，才能对这样一个广大而且多样的区域进行有效的了解。

4.According to NASA's Ask an Astrobiologist website, the theory that the world will end in December 2012 is a conflation of two ideas, one derived from the Sumerians, the other from the Maya.

根据NASA的网站Askan Astrobilogist(向天体物理学家提问)的说法，2012世界毁灭理论是两种说法的融合，一种来源于苏美尔人，一种来源于玛雅人。

5.Conflation means if the same record is updated or dirtied multiple times within the buffering period then it only keeps the last update.

合并意味着如果相同的记录被更新，或者在缓冲区内被多次标记为脏数据，则只保证最后一次更新。

6.And considered that today's map conflation should include data preprocessing, map alignment, feature matching and checking, user interaction, data transferring.

并认为目前的地图合并流程一般主要包括五个过程：数据预处理、地图对准、同名实体匹配及检验、人工交互、数据合并。

7.Halliday discovered that children's language informing function occur at the age of two, symbolizing the formation of their abstraction ability, that means the occurrence of domain conflation.

韩礼德经研究发现儿童语言的告知功能是在两岁以后出现的，它标志着抽象能力的形成，域重合开始出现。

8.As an additional performance improvement, the cache does conflation on these dirty records.

作为额外的性能改善，缓存会合并这些脏记录。

9.Halliday discovered that children's language informing function occur at the age of two, symbolizing the formation of their abstraction ability, that means the occurrence of domain conflation.

韩礼德经研究发现儿童语言的告知功能是在两岁以后出现的，它标志着抽象能力的形成，域重合开始出现。

10.In the debate, there was a troubling conflation of economic growth with overall societal well-being.

在辩论中，经济增长与整体社会福祉之间存在令人担忧的混淆。

11.The author’s work suffers from a serious conflation of fact and fiction, making it hard to distinguish reality from imagination.

作者的作品严重存在混淆事实与虚构的问题，使得人们很难区分现实与想象。

12.The conflation of different cultural practices can lead to misunderstandings and stereotypes.

不同文化习俗的混淆可能导致误解和刻板印象。

13.The film's conflation of historical events created a misleading narrative.

这部电影对历史事件的混淆造成了误导性的叙述。

14.Her argument is based on a conflation of personal beliefs and scientific evidence.

她的论点基于个人信仰与科学证据的混淆。

作文

In today's fast-paced world, the ability to discern between different concepts is crucial for effective communication. However, one common pitfall that many people encounter is the tendency to engage in conflation (混淆) of ideas. This occurs when two or more distinct concepts are incorrectly combined or treated as if they are the same. Such a misunderstanding can lead to confusion and misinterpretation, particularly in discussions involving complex subjects such as politics, economics, and social issues.For instance, consider the debate surrounding climate change. Some individuals may conflate conflation (混淆) the scientific consensus on climate change with political opinions about environmental policies. While the science behind climate change is based on empirical evidence and research, political views can vary widely depending on personal beliefs and values. By failing to distinguish between these two realms, individuals may inadvertently undermine the importance of scientific findings, leading to a distorted understanding of the issue at hand.Another example can be found in the realm of education. The terms 'education' and 'training' are often used interchangeably, but they represent different approaches to learning. Education typically refers to a broader process that encompasses the acquisition of knowledge, critical thinking, and the development of intellectual skills. In contrast, training focuses on specific skills or competencies needed for particular tasks or jobs. When educators or policymakers engage in conflation (混淆) of these terms, they risk creating programs that either lack depth or fail to meet the practical needs of learners.The media also plays a significant role in the conflation (混淆) of ideas. Headlines are often designed to grab attention, which can lead to oversimplification of complex topics. For example, a news article might discuss the economic impact of a new law while simultaneously addressing public opinion on the matter. If readers do not recognize the distinction between the economic analysis and the public sentiment, they may develop a skewed perspective on the overall implications of the law. This highlights the importance of critical thinking and careful analysis when consuming information from various sources.To combat the negative effects of conflation (混淆), it is essential to cultivate a mindset of clarity and precision in our communication. This involves actively questioning our assumptions and seeking to understand the nuances of different concepts. Engaging in discussions with others who hold diverse perspectives can also help to illuminate distinctions that may have been previously overlooked.Moreover, educators should emphasize the importance of critical thinking skills in their curricula. By teaching students how to analyze and differentiate between similar concepts, we can equip them with the tools necessary to navigate an increasingly complex world. This will not only enhance their understanding of various subjects but also promote more informed and constructive dialogue in society.In conclusion, the conflation (混淆) of ideas is a pervasive issue that can hinder effective communication and understanding. By recognizing the importance of distinguishing between different concepts, we can foster clearer discussions and better decision-making processes. It is crucial for individuals, educators, and media outlets alike to prioritize clarity in their communication, ultimately leading to a more informed and engaged society.

在当今快节奏的世界中，区分不同概念的能力对于有效沟通至关重要。然而，许多人常常遇到的一个常见陷阱是倾向于进行conflation（混淆）思想。这种情况发生在两个或多个不同的概念被错误地结合或视为相同的时候。这种误解可能导致混乱和误解，尤其是在涉及政治、经济和社会问题等复杂主题的讨论中。例如，考虑关于气候变化的辩论。一些人可能会将conflation（混淆）气候变化的科学共识与关于环境政策的政治观点混为一谈。虽然气候变化背后的科学是基于实证证据和研究，但政治观点可能因个人信仰和价值观而大相径庭。通过未能区分这两个领域，个人可能无意中削弱科学发现的重要性，从而导致对相关问题的扭曲理解。另一个例子可以在教育领域找到。“教育”和“培训”这两个术语经常被交替使用，但它们代表了不同的学习方法。教育通常指的是一个更广泛的过程，包含知识的获取、批判性思维和智力技能的发展。相反，培训则专注于特定任务或工作的具体技能或能力。当教育者或政策制定者对这些术语进行conflation（混淆）时，他们可能会冒险创建缺乏深度或未能满足学习者实际需求的项目。媒体在思想的conflation（混淆）中也扮演着重要角色。标题通常旨在吸引注意力，这可能导致对复杂主题的简化。例如，一篇新闻文章可能讨论新法律的经济影响，同时还涉及公众对此事的看法。如果读者没有意识到经济分析与公众情绪之间的区别，他们可能会对该法律的整体影响形成偏颇的看法。这突显了在从各种来源获取信息时，批判性思维和仔细分析的重要性。为了对抗conflation（混淆）的负面影响，培养一种清晰和准确的沟通心态至关重要。这涉及到积极质疑我们的假设，并寻求理解不同概念的细微差别。与持有不同观点的其他人进行讨论也可以帮助阐明可能被忽视的区别。此外，教育者应强调批判性思维技能在课程中的重要性。通过教导学生如何分析和区分相似概念，我们可以赋予他们在日益复杂的世界中导航所需的工具。这不仅会增强他们对各种学科的理解，还会促进社会中更具建设性的对话。总之，思想的conflation（混淆）是一个普遍存在的问题，可能会阻碍有效的沟通和理解。通过认识到区分不同概念的重要性，我们可以促进更清晰的讨论和更好的决策过程。个人、教育者和媒体机构都必须优先考虑沟通的清晰性，最终导致一个更为知情和参与的社会。