deregulate

简明释义

英[ˌdiːˈreɡjuleɪt]美[ˌdiːˈreɡjuleɪt]

v. 撤销对……的管制，解除控制

第 三 人 称 单 数 d e r e g u l a t e s

现 在 分 词 d e r e g u l a t i n g

过 去 式 d e r e g u l a t e d

过 去 分 词 d e r e g u l a t e d

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.Cut taxes and spending, privatize, and deregulate.

缩减税收和消费，私有化，接触管制。

2.Lower taxes should stimulate growth. And the wisest response to high unemployment is to deregulate Labour markets and eschew minimum wages.

减税可以刺激经济增长，而对付高失业率的最为明智的举措是放松对劳动力市场的监管，放开最低工资限制。

3.The aim of the WTO is to deregulate international trade.

现代WTO的目标是解除国际贸易的管制。

4.He thinks both were the consequence of politicians' willingness to deregulate the financial sector, which partly reflected the industry's lobbying prowess.

他认为，两者都是政客放松金融业管制的后果，这部分反映出了金融业强大的游说功力。

5.Lower taxes should stimulate growth.And the wisest response to high unemployment is to deregulate Labour markets and eschew minimum wages.

减税可以刺激经济增长，而对付高失业率的最为明智的举措是放松对劳动力市场的监管，放开最低工资限制。

6.This started changing, however, in the mid-1970s, when America began to deregulate its transportation industry.

然而，这种情况在20世纪70年代中期，美国开始放松对运输业的管制时开始改变。

7.In order to increase competitiveness, individual nations will further deregulate and globalize the flow of manpower, resources, and information.

为了增加竞争力，各个国家的人员、资源、信息的流通也必须更自由化及国际化。

8.The administration plans to deregulate the transportation sector to boost economic growth.

政府计划放松交通运输行业的管制以促进经济增长。

9.The government decided to deregulate the telecommunications industry to encourage competition.

政府决定放松管制电信行业，以鼓励竞争。

10.After the decision to deregulate banking, several new banks entered the market.

在决定放松银行业管制之后，几家新银行进入了市场。

11.Some argue that deregulating the housing market can lead to more affordable homes.

一些人认为，放松住房市场的管制可以导致更实惠的住房。

12.Many believe that deregulating the energy market could lead to lower prices for consumers.

许多人认为，放松能源市场的管制可能会导致消费者价格降低。

作文

The concept of deregulate refers to the process of removing or reducing government regulations that control how businesses operate. This idea has been a topic of much debate in recent years, especially in relation to economic growth and consumer protection. Proponents argue that deregulate can lead to increased efficiency and innovation within industries, as businesses are given more freedom to operate without bureaucratic constraints. For instance, in the telecommunications industry, deregulate has allowed for new companies to enter the market, leading to more choices and lower prices for consumers.However, critics of deregulate caution that it can also lead to negative consequences. Without adequate regulations, there is a risk that companies may prioritize profits over safety and ethics. The financial crisis of 2008 is often cited as an example where excessive deregulate in the banking sector contributed to reckless behavior and ultimately led to widespread economic turmoil. This highlights the need for a balanced approach to regulation—ensuring that businesses can thrive while also protecting consumers and the economy.In addition, deregulate can have varying effects across different sectors. In industries like energy, deregulate can foster competition and drive down prices, benefiting consumers. However, in sectors like healthcare, deregulate can compromise the quality of services and access to care. Therefore, policymakers must carefully consider the implications of deregulate before implementing such measures.Moreover, the impact of deregulate is not uniform across all regions. In some countries, deregulate has led to significant economic growth and technological advancements, while in others, it has resulted in increased inequality and market failures. For instance, the deregulate of the airline industry in the United States in the late 1970s led to a boom in air travel and lower fares, but it also resulted in the collapse of several airlines and job losses.In conclusion, the decision to deregulate should be approached with caution. While it can stimulate economic growth and innovation, it is crucial to maintain a regulatory framework that protects consumers and ensures fair competition. A thoughtful examination of the potential benefits and risks associated with deregulate will help create policies that foster both economic development and social responsibility. Ultimately, the goal should be to find a balance that encourages business success while safeguarding the interests of the public.

“deregulate”的概念是指取消或减少控制企业运营的政府法规的过程。近年来，这一理念成为了广泛争论的话题，尤其是在经济增长和消费者保护方面。支持者认为，deregulate可以提高行业效率和创新，因为企业在没有官僚约束的情况下能够更自由地运营。例如，在电信行业，deregulate使得新公司能够进入市场，为消费者提供更多选择和更低的价格。然而，deregulate的批评者警告说，这也可能导致负面后果。如果没有足够的监管，企业可能会优先考虑利润而忽视安全和伦理。2008年的金融危机常被引用为一个例子，过度的deregulate在银行业促进了不负责任的行为，最终导致了广泛的经济动荡。这突显了对监管采取平衡方法的必要性——确保企业能够蓬勃发展，同时保护消费者和经济。此外，deregulate在不同部门的影响并不相同。在能源等行业，deregulate可以促进竞争并降低价格，从而惠及消费者。然而，在医疗保健等领域，deregulate可能会损害服务质量和护理的可及性。因此，政策制定者在实施此类措施之前必须仔细考虑deregulate的影响。此外，deregulate的影响在不同地区并不均匀。在一些国家，deregulate导致了显著的经济增长和技术进步，而在其他国家则导致了不平等加剧和市场失灵。例如，美国在1970年代后期的航空业deregulate导致了航空旅行的繁荣和票价下降，但也导致了几家航空公司的倒闭和失业。总之，决定是否要deregulate应谨慎处理。虽然这可以刺激经济增长和创新，但维护一个保护消费者和确保公平竞争的监管框架至关重要。对与deregulate相关的潜在收益和风险进行深入审查，将有助于制定既促进经济发展又体现社会责任的政策。最终，目标应该是找到一种平衡，既鼓励商业成功，又保护公众利益。