appropriate gratis; unpaid appropriation

简明释义

无偿拨款

英英释义

例句

1.The software license allows users to engage in appropriate gratis; unpaid appropriation as long as they credit the original developer.

该软件许可证允许用户进行适当的免费使用；无偿占用，只要他们给予原开发者适当的信用。

2.Many open-source projects thrive on the principle of appropriate gratis; unpaid appropriation, encouraging innovation and sharing.

许多开源项目基于适当的免费使用；无偿占用的原则蓬勃发展，鼓励创新和共享。

3.The artist decided to share her work with the community, allowing others to use it under the terms of appropriate gratis; unpaid appropriation.

这位艺术家决定与社区分享她的作品，允许他人在适当的免费使用；无偿占用的条款下使用。

4.In the spirit of collaboration, the researchers agreed to allow appropriate gratis; unpaid appropriation of their findings by other institutions.

出于合作的精神，研究人员同意允许其他机构对他们的发现进行适当的免费使用；无偿占用。

5.The non-profit organization promotes appropriate gratis; unpaid appropriation of educational resources to ensure equal access for all students.

该非营利组织提倡教育资源的适当的免费使用；无偿占用，以确保所有学生平等获取。

作文

In today's world, the concept of ownership and usage of resources has evolved significantly. One term that often arises in discussions about resource allocation and utilization is appropriate gratis; unpaid appropriation. This phrase refers to the act of taking or using something without paying for it or without any formal agreement, essentially implying that the resource is used freely and without monetary exchange. Understanding this term is crucial in various contexts, including economics, law, and social ethics.To begin with, the idea of appropriate gratis; unpaid appropriation can be seen in everyday scenarios. For instance, when individuals use public parks, they benefit from the maintained environment without directly contributing to its upkeep. The park is funded by taxpayer money, and thus, while users do not pay at the point of use, they are indirectly supported by the community's collective financial contributions. This raises questions about fairness and equity, as some people may utilize these resources more than others without any direct payment.Furthermore, in the realm of intellectual property, the term appropriate gratis; unpaid appropriation takes on a different dimension. Many creators, such as artists, writers, and musicians, often find their work shared and used without proper compensation. For example, a musician’s song might be played in a public space or featured in a video without the artist receiving any royalties. This form of appropriation can lead to significant losses for creators and raises ethical concerns about the value of their work and the rights they hold over it.Moreover, the digital age has amplified instances of appropriate gratis; unpaid appropriation. With the rise of the internet, content sharing has become ubiquitous. Social media platforms allow users to share images, videos, and articles with little regard for copyright laws. While some argue that this promotes creativity and exposure, others contend that it undermines the original creator's ability to monetize their work. The balance between free access to information and fair compensation for creators is a contentious issue that society continues to grapple with.Additionally, the environmental aspect of appropriate gratis; unpaid appropriation cannot be overlooked. Natural resources such as water, air, and forests are often utilized by individuals and industries without direct payment. This can lead to overexploitation and depletion of these vital resources. For instance, illegal logging or fishing practices result in significant ecological damage while benefiting those who engage in such activities without any financial responsibility. This situation highlights the need for sustainable practices and regulations that ensure resources are used responsibly and equitably.In conclusion, the term appropriate gratis; unpaid appropriation encapsulates a complex interplay of ethics, economics, and social responsibility. It challenges us to consider the implications of using resources without payment and the potential consequences for both individuals and society as a whole. As we navigate through various aspects of life, from public services to creative works and natural resources, it is imperative to foster a culture of respect and accountability. By doing so, we can ensure that all parties involved are treated fairly and that resources are preserved for future generations.

在当今世界，资源的所有权和使用概念发生了显著变化。一个常在关于资源分配和利用的讨论中出现的术语是适当的免费；无偿占用。这个短语指的是在没有支付或没有任何正式协议的情况下获取或使用某物的行为，本质上意味着该资源被自由使用而没有货币交换。理解这个术语在经济学、法律和社会伦理等各种背景下至关重要。首先，适当的免费；无偿占用的概念可以在日常场景中看到。例如，当个人使用公共公园时，他们从维护良好的环境中受益，而无需直接为其维护做出贡献。公园由纳税人的资金支持，因此，虽然用户在使用时不付费，但他们间接地受益于社区的集体财政贡献。这引发了关于公平和公正的问题，因为一些人可能比其他人更频繁地利用这些资源，而没有任何直接的付款。此外，在知识产权领域，适当的免费；无偿占用这一术语则具有不同的维度。许多创作者，如艺术家、作家和音乐家，常常发现他们的作品在没有适当补偿的情况下被分享和使用。例如，一位音乐家的歌曲可能在公共场所播放或在视频中使用，而艺术家并未获得任何版税。这种形式的占用可能导致创作者遭受重大损失，并引发关于他们作品价值和他们所拥有权利的伦理问题。此外，数字时代放大了适当的免费；无偿占用的情况。随着互联网的兴起，内容分享变得无处不在。社交媒体平台允许用户分享图像、视频和文章，而几乎不考虑版权法。虽然一些人认为这促进了创造力和曝光，但另一些人则认为这削弱了原创创作者变现其作品的能力。自由获取信息与对创作者的公平补偿之间的平衡是社会持续争论的一个问题。此外，适当的免费；无偿占用的环境方面也不容忽视。水、空气和森林等自然资源通常被个人和行业在没有直接付款的情况下使用。这可能导致这些重要资源的过度开发和枯竭。例如，非法伐木或捕鱼行为导致重大生态损害，同时使参与这些活动的人在没有任何经济责任的情况下获益。这种情况突显了可持续实践和确保资源得到负责任和公平使用的法规的必要性。总之，适当的免费；无偿占用这一术语概括了伦理、经济和社会责任之间复杂的相互作用。它挑战我们思考在不付款的情况下使用资源的影响，以及对个人和社会整体的潜在后果。在我们生活的各个方面，从公共服务到创作作品再到自然资源，培养尊重和问责的文化至关重要。通过这样做，我们可以确保所有参与方都得到公平对待，并且资源能够为后代保留。