unliquidated damages

简明释义

未清偿损失，未确定损害赔偿额

英英释义

例句

1.In a breach of contract case, the court may award unliquidated damages 未确定的损害赔偿 based on the actual loss suffered by the plaintiff.

在一起合同违约案件中，法院可能会根据原告实际遭受的损失判给unliquidated damages 未确定的损害赔偿。

2.The judge explained that unliquidated damages 未确定的损害赔偿 are not predetermined and must be calculated based on evidence presented.

法官解释说，unliquidated damages 未确定的损害赔偿并不是预先确定的，必须根据提供的证据进行计算。

3.The contractor was unable to specify the unliquidated damages 未确定的损害赔偿 in the contract, leading to disputes later on.

承包商无法在合同中具体说明unliquidated damages 未确定的损害赔偿，导致后来的争议。

4.After the accident, the injured party sought unliquidated damages 未确定的损害赔偿 for pain and suffering.

事故发生后，受伤方寻求因痛苦和折磨而获得的unliquidated damages 未确定的损害赔偿。

5.In personal injury cases, plaintiffs often claim unliquidated damages 未确定的损害赔偿 for emotional distress.

在个人伤害案件中，原告通常会要求因情感困扰而获得的unliquidated damages 未确定的损害赔偿。

作文

In the realm of contract law, the concept of unliquidated damages plays a crucial role in determining the compensation owed to a party when a breach of contract occurs. Unlike liquidated damages, which are predetermined and specified within the contract itself, unliquidated damages refer to compensation that is not fixed or agreed upon beforehand. This type of damage arises from losses that are difficult to quantify, making it essential for courts to evaluate the extent of harm on a case-by-case basis.To better understand unliquidated damages, it is important to grasp the difference between liquidated and unliquidated damages. Liquidated damages are typically stipulated in a contract as a specific amount that one party agrees to pay if they fail to fulfill their contractual obligations. For example, if a contractor fails to complete a project on time, the contract may specify a daily penalty until the project is finished. In contrast, unliquidated damages do not have such clear parameters and often require extensive evidence to establish the actual loss suffered by the injured party.The determination of unliquidated damages can involve various factors, including the nature of the breach, the relationship between the parties, and the impact of the breach on the non-breaching party. Courts may consider lost profits, emotional distress, or other consequential losses when calculating unliquidated damages. This process underscores the subjective nature of these damages, as different judges may arrive at different conclusions based on the same set of facts.One significant aspect of unliquidated damages is their unpredictability. Parties entering into a contract may not fully appreciate the potential risks associated with breaches and the subsequent financial implications. This uncertainty can lead to disputes and lengthy legal battles, as each party may have differing views on what constitutes a fair assessment of damages. Therefore, it is advisable for parties to include clauses in their contracts that address how unliquidated damages will be handled, potentially reducing the likelihood of conflict down the line.Additionally, the concept of unliquidated damages extends beyond mere monetary compensation. It can also encompass equitable remedies, such as specific performance or injunctions, which aim to restore the injured party to their original position rather than just providing financial restitution. This broader perspective highlights the importance of understanding the full implications of a breach of contract and the various forms of remedy available.In conclusion, unliquidated damages represent a complex area of contract law that requires careful consideration and understanding. As businesses and individuals engage in various agreements, recognizing the potential for breaches and the ensuing unliquidated damages can help mitigate risks and foster more effective contractual relationships. By being aware of the unpredictable nature of these damages and the factors influencing their determination, parties can better prepare themselves for the challenges that may arise in the event of a contract breach.

在合同法领域，unliquidated damages（未确定损害赔偿）这一概念在确定在违约情况下应支付的赔偿金时发挥着至关重要的作用。与合同中预先确定并具体规定的确定性损害赔偿不同，unliquidated damages指的是事先没有固定或约定的赔偿。这种类型的损害源于难以量化的损失，因此法院必须根据具体情况逐案评估损害程度。为了更好地理解unliquidated damages，重要的是要掌握确定性和未确定性损害赔偿之间的区别。确定性损害赔偿通常在合同中规定为一方同意在未能履行合同义务时支付的特定金额。例如，如果承包商未能按时完成项目，合同可能会规定每天罚款，直到项目完成。相比之下，unliquidated damages没有如此明确的参数，通常需要大量证据来确定受害方实际遭受的损失。确定unliquidated damages可能涉及多种因素，包括违约的性质、当事方之间的关系以及违约对非违约方的影响。法院在计算unliquidated damages时，可能会考虑失去的利润、情感困扰或其他后果性损失。这一过程强调了这些损害的主观性，因为不同的法官可能会根据相同的事实得出不同的结论。unliquidated damages的一个重要方面是其不可预测性。签订合同的各方可能并未充分意识到违约及随之而来的财务影响所带来的潜在风险。这种不确定性可能导致争议和漫长的法律斗争，因为每一方可能对什么构成公平的损害评估有不同的看法。因此，建议各方在合同中包含条款，以解决如何处理unliquidated damages的问题，从而减少未来发生冲突的可能性。此外，unliquidated damages的概念超出了单纯的货币赔偿。它还可以包括衡平救济，如特定履行或禁令，旨在将受害方恢复到其原始状态，而不仅仅是提供财务补偿。这一更广泛的视角突显了理解违约的全面影响及可用的各种救济形式的重要性。总之，unliquidated damages代表了合同法中的一个复杂领域，需要谨慎的考虑和理解。随着企业和个人参与各种协议，认识到违约的潜在风险及随之而来的unliquidated damages可以帮助降低风险，促进更有效的合同关系。通过了解这些损害的不可预测性及影响其确定的因素，各方可以更好地为在合同违约情况下可能出现的挑战做好准备。