full state trading

简明释义

完全国营的贸易

英英释义

例句

1.In a system of full state trading, all import and export activities are managed by the state.

在全面国有贸易的体系中，所有的进出口活动都由国家管理。

2.Under full state trading, the government can better regulate foreign trade policies.

在全面国有贸易下，政府可以更好地监管对外贸易政策。

3.The transition to full state trading was met with mixed reactions from the public.

向全面国有贸易的过渡引起了公众的不同反应。

4.Countries with full state trading often have less competition in the market.

拥有全面国有贸易的国家通常市场竞争较少。

5.The government decided to implement full state trading to control the prices of essential goods.

政府决定实施全面国有贸易以控制基本商品的价格。

作文

In the modern world, economies are often categorized based on how much the government intervenes in trade and commerce. One such category is known as full state trading, which refers to a system where the government controls all aspects of trade, including import and export activities. This economic approach can be contrasted with free market systems where private entities operate independently. Understanding full state trading is crucial for analyzing how different nations manage their economies and interact on the global stage.Historically, full state trading has been practiced in various forms, especially in countries with strong centralized governments. For instance, during the Soviet Union era, the government monopolized foreign trade, thereby controlling what goods were imported and exported. This system aimed to ensure that the state could achieve its economic goals, such as self-sufficiency and the redistribution of wealth. While this approach may seem beneficial in theory, it often led to inefficiencies, shortages, and a lack of innovation.One of the primary advantages of full state trading is that it allows the government to protect domestic industries from foreign competition. By controlling trade, a government can impose tariffs or quotas on imports, which can help local businesses thrive. This protectionist strategy can be particularly appealing in developing countries that are trying to build their industries without being overwhelmed by more established foreign companies.However, the drawbacks of full state trading cannot be overlooked. A significant downside is the potential for corruption and mismanagement. When the government has complete control over trade, there is a risk that officials may exploit their power for personal gain. Additionally, without competition from private enterprises, there may be less incentive for innovation and efficiency, leading to stagnation in various sectors of the economy.Moreover, full state trading can create tensions in international relations. Countries that employ this system may find themselves at odds with nations that advocate for free trade principles. Trade wars can arise when governments impose restrictions that other countries view as unfair. For example, if a nation practicing full state trading imposes heavy tariffs on imports, it may provoke retaliatory measures from its trading partners, resulting in a cycle of escalating trade barriers.In conclusion, full state trading represents a significant approach to managing a nation's economy. While it offers certain advantages, such as protecting domestic industries and achieving specific economic objectives, it also presents considerable challenges, including inefficiencies and potential corruption. As the world becomes increasingly interconnected, understanding the implications of full state trading is essential for policymakers and economists alike. The balance between state control and market freedom will continue to shape the future of global trade and economic development.

在现代世界中，经济通常根据政府在贸易和商业中干预的程度进行分类。其中一种分类被称为全面国家贸易，指的是一种由政府控制所有贸易方面的系统，包括进出口活动。这种经济方法可以与自由市场体系形成对比，在自由市场体系中，私营实体独立运营。理解全面国家贸易对于分析不同国家如何管理其经济以及在全球舞台上互动至关重要。历史上，全面国家贸易以各种形式被实践，特别是在拥有强大中央集权政府的国家。例如，在苏联时代，政府垄断了对外贸易，从而控制了进口和出口的商品。这一制度旨在确保国家能够实现其经济目标，如自给自足和财富再分配。虽然这种方法在理论上似乎是有益的，但它往往导致低效率、短缺和缺乏创新。全面国家贸易的主要优势之一是允许政府保护国内产业免受外国竞争的影响。通过控制贸易，政府可以对进口商品征收关税或配额，这可以帮助当地企业蓬勃发展。这种保护主义策略在试图在没有被更成熟的外国公司压倒的情况下建立工业的发展中国家中尤其具有吸引力。然而，全面国家贸易的缺点也不容忽视。一个显著的缺点是腐败和管理不善的潜在性。当政府对贸易拥有完全控制权时，官员可能会利用他们的权力谋取个人利益。此外，缺乏来自私营企业的竞争，可能会减少创新和效率的动力，导致经济各个部门的停滞。此外，全面国家贸易可能会在国际关系中造成紧张。实施这一制度的国家可能会与倡导自由贸易原则的国家发生冲突。当政府施加其他国家认为不公平的限制时，贸易战可能会爆发。例如，如果一个实施全面国家贸易的国家对进口商品征收重税，它可能会激起其贸易伙伴的报复措施，从而导致贸易壁垒升级的循环。总之，全面国家贸易代表了一种管理国家经济的重要方法。虽然它提供了一些优势，例如保护国内产业和实现特定经济目标，但也带来了相当大的挑战，包括低效率和潜在腐败。随着世界日益相互联系，理解全面国家贸易的影响对于政策制定者和经济学家来说至关重要。国家控制与市场自由之间的平衡将继续塑造全球贸易和经济发展的未来。