trust territory

简明释义

托管地，托管领土

英英释义

例句

1.Micronesia was once a trust territory 托管领土 under U.S. administration before becoming a sovereign nation.

密克罗尼西亚曾是一个托管领土 trust territory，在美国的管理下，后来成为一个主权国家。

2.The transition from a trust territory 托管领土 to a fully independent state can be complex and lengthy.

从托管领土 trust territory 过渡到完全独立的国家可能是复杂且漫长的。

3.The United Nations administered the region as a trust territory 托管领土 until it achieved independence.

联合国将该地区作为一个托管领土 trust territory 管理，直到它获得独立。

4.After World War II, many islands were designated as trust territories 托管领土 to ensure their development.

二战后，许多岛屿被指定为托管领土 trust territories，以确保它们的发展。

5.The concept of a trust territory 托管领土 allows for international oversight during the transition to self-governance.

一个托管领土 trust territory 的概念允许在过渡到自我治理期间进行国际监督。

作文

The concept of a trust territory refers to a region that is placed under the administration of another country or organization, typically following the end of colonial rule. This arrangement is often established to ensure the political, social, and economic development of the territory until it is deemed ready for self-governance. The idea emerged after World War II, particularly under the auspices of the United Nations, which sought to promote peace and stability in regions previously governed by colonial powers. In a trust territory, the administering authority is responsible for the welfare of the inhabitants and must ensure that their rights are protected while guiding them toward self-determination. One of the most notable examples of a trust territory was the Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands, which included several islands in the Pacific Ocean that were administered by the United States after World War II. This arrangement was designed to help these islands transition from colonial status to full independence. The administration of a trust territory can vary significantly, depending on the specific circumstances and agreements made at the time of its establishment. In some cases, the administering power may have significant control over local governance, while in others, there may be a degree of autonomy granted to local leaders. The ultimate goal, however, remains the same: to prepare the territory for self-rule. As the world has evolved, the concept of a trust territory has become less common, with many former territories achieving independence or integrating into other nations. Nevertheless, the principles behind trust territories still resonate today, particularly in discussions about decolonization and the rights of indigenous peoples. The legacy of trust territories serves as a reminder of the complexities involved in transitioning from colonial rule to self-determination. Critics of the trust territory system argue that it can perpetuate a form of dependency on the administering power, as local populations may not receive the necessary support to develop their own governance structures effectively. In contrast, proponents contend that these arrangements can provide essential resources and stability during a critical period of transition. Ultimately, the success of a trust territory hinges on the commitment of both the administering authority and the local population to work collaboratively toward a shared goal of independence. It requires open communication, mutual respect, and a genuine effort to empower the people of the territory. As we reflect on the history of trust territories, it becomes clear that the path to self-determination is complex and multifaceted, shaped by historical contexts and the aspirations of the people involved. In conclusion, understanding the term trust territory provides valuable insight into the broader themes of colonialism, governance, and the quest for autonomy. It highlights the importance of recognizing the rights of all peoples to self-determination and the ongoing challenges faced by those transitioning from colonial rule. As we move forward in a globalized world, it is crucial to learn from the lessons of the past and strive for a future where every nation and territory can thrive independently and with dignity.

“信托领土”这一概念指的是一个地区被置于另一个国家或组织的管理之下，通常是在殖民统治结束后。这种安排通常是为了确保该领土的政治、社会和经济发展，直到其被认为准备好自我治理为止。这个理念在二战后出现，特别是在联合国的支持下，联合国旨在促进以前由殖民大国统治的地区的和平与稳定。在“信托领土”中，管理当局负责居民的福利，并必须确保他们的权利受到保护，同时引导他们走向自决。最著名的“信托领土”之一是太平洋信托领土，包括二战后由美国管理的几个太平洋岛屿。这种安排旨在帮助这些岛屿从殖民地地位过渡到完全独立。“信托领土”的管理可以根据具体情况和建立时达成的协议而有显著不同。在某些情况下，管理权力可能对地方治理有重大控制，而在其他情况下，可能会给予地方领导人一定程度的自主权。然而，最终目标保持不变：为领土准备自我治理。随着世界的发展，“信托领土”的概念变得越来越少见，许多前领土实现了独立或融入其他国家。然而，信托领土背后的原则在今天仍然引起共鸣，特别是在关于去殖民化和土著人民权利的讨论中。“信托领土”的遗产提醒我们，在从殖民统治过渡到自决的过程中存在复杂性。对“信托领土”制度的批评者认为，它可能会使管理权力对地方人口产生依赖，因为当地居民可能无法有效获得必要的支持来发展自己的治理结构。相反，支持者则认为，这些安排可以在过渡的关键时期提供必要的资源和稳定。最终，“信托领土”的成功取决于管理当局和当地居民共同努力朝着独立的共同目标前进的承诺。这需要开放的沟通、相互尊重以及真正致力于赋予领土人民权力的努力。当我们回顾“信托领土”的历史时，可以清楚地看到，自决之路复杂多面，受历史背景和相关人民的愿望所塑造。总之，理解“信托领土”一词为我们提供了对殖民主义、治理和追求自主权等更广泛主题的宝贵洞察。它突显了认识所有民族自决权的重要性，以及那些从殖民统治过渡的人们所面临的持续挑战。随着我们在全球化的世界中前进，学习过去的教训并努力争取每个国家和领土能够独立、尊严地繁荣的未来至关重要。