brehon
简明释义
古时法官
n. （Brehon）人名；（英）布里恩；（法）布勒翁
英英释义
A brehon was a judge in ancient Ireland who presided over legal matters and disputes, often relying on customary law rather than written statutes. | Brehon 是古爱尔兰的一种法官，负责处理法律事务和争议，通常依赖习惯法而非成文法。 |
单词用法
同义词
| 法官 | 法官支持了原告的请求。 | ||
| 仲裁者 | 一位仲裁者被请来解决争端。 | ||
| 治安法官 | 治安法官对违规行为处以罚款。 |
反义词
| 法官 | 法官支持了原告的请求。 | ||
| 仲裁者 | 仲裁者帮助双方达成了一致意见。 |
例句
1.One Thursday evening, July 17th 1941, Brigadier-General Brehon Somervell, on his own initiative, assembled a small group of officers from the army's construction division.
1941年7月14日星期四的一个晚上，准将军布莱宏•索穆威尔(Brehon Somervell)主动地召集了陆军工程部的一群官员。
2.One Thursday evening, July 17th 1941, Brigadier-General Brehon Somervell, on his own initiative, assembled a small group of officers from the army's construction division.
1941年7月14日星期四的一个晚上，准将军布莱宏•索穆威尔(Brehon Somervell)主动地召集了陆军工程部的一群官员。
3.In ancient Ireland, a brehon was responsible for settling disputes among the tribes.
在古代爱尔兰，brehon负责调解部落之间的争端。
4.The decisions made by a brehon were often based on customary law.
由brehon做出的决定通常基于习惯法。
5.A wise brehon could maintain peace within the community.
一个聪明的brehon能够维持社区内的和平。
6.People would gather to hear the rulings of the brehon during clan meetings.
人们会在氏族会议上聚集听取brehon的裁决。
7.The role of a brehon was similar to that of a modern-day judge.
brehon的角色类似于现代法官。
作文
In ancient Ireland, the role of a brehon (法官) was crucial in maintaining order and justice within the community. The term refers to a judge or legal expert who was responsible for interpreting and applying the customary laws known as the Brehon Laws. These laws were not written down initially but were passed orally through generations, emphasizing the importance of tradition and local customs in governance. The brehon (法官) would settle disputes, oversee legal matters, and ensure that the community adhered to these laws, which covered various aspects of life, including property rights, marriage, and social conduct.The significance of the brehon (法官) in society cannot be overstated. They were respected figures who often acted as mediators in conflicts, promoting reconciliation rather than punishment. This approach reflects the values of the community, where harmony and cooperation were prioritized over strict adherence to punitive measures. The brehon (法官) would listen to both parties in a dispute, weigh the evidence, and make decisions based on fairness and equity, rather than rigid legal codes. Moreover, the role of a brehon (法官) was not limited to resolving conflicts; they also played an educational role, teaching the community about their rights and responsibilities under the Brehon Laws. This aspect was essential in a time when literacy rates were low, and oral tradition was the primary means of knowledge transmission. The brehon (法官) would often hold gatherings where community members could learn about the laws that governed them, fostering a sense of collective responsibility and awareness.As society evolved, the influence of the brehon (法官) began to wane, particularly with the arrival of English rule in Ireland. The imposition of English common law sought to replace the indigenous legal system, diminishing the authority of the brehon (法官) and their traditional practices. This transition marked a significant cultural shift, as many of the principles upheld by the brehon (法官) were lost or overlooked in favor of a more centralized and bureaucratic legal system. Despite this decline, the legacy of the brehon (法官) endures in modern discussions about law and justice. Their emphasis on restorative justice and community involvement resonates with contemporary movements that advocate for alternative dispute resolution methods. Today, many legal scholars and practitioners look back at the Brehon Laws and the role of the brehon (法官) as a source of inspiration for developing more equitable and culturally sensitive legal frameworks.In conclusion, the brehon (法官) was more than just a judge; they were a cornerstone of ancient Irish society, embodying the principles of justice, community, and tradition. Their impact on the legal landscape and social norms of the time highlights the importance of understanding historical contexts in shaping modern legal systems. As we reflect on the role of the brehon (法官), we can appreciate the richness of cultural heritage and the ongoing relevance of traditional practices in contemporary society.
