evasively

简明释义

英[ɪˈveɪsɪvli]美[ɪˈveɪsɪvli]

adv. 逃避地；推诿地

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1."Until I can speak to your husband I can't come to any conclusion about that," Manuel said evasively.

“关于那件事情我要跟你丈夫谈了之后才能作出结论，”曼纽尔托辞说。

2.O I know I know so it is' replied the Rat evasively. 'But I think we won't go there just now.

“好，好，好。我是说过。”河鼠含糊其辞地说。“但我认为不是现在去，不是现在。”

3."I - not - I was joking," said Harry evasively.

“我——不是——我开玩笑呢。”哈利闪烁其词地说。

4."At another time, sir, " he returned, evasively, "the present time isillconwenient for explainin'.

“下回再解释吧，先生，”他躲闪道，“现在解释不方便。

5.Contemporary poets answer evasively when asked what it is, and if it actually exists.

如果真的有灵感，当代诗人也作不出明确的回答。

6.It's just a book, "she said evasively, looking about with apprehension."

“就是一本书呗，”她推托着说，提心吊胆地四下看看。

7."But, since he could hardly put it in that way to Winsett, he answered evasively:" Look at the career of the honest man in American politics!

但是，因为他很难照直向温塞特说明，所以便含糊其辞地回答说：“看看美国政界正派人的遭遇吧！”

8.She smiled evasively when asked about her relationship status.

当被问及她的感情状态时，她含糊其辞地微笑。

9.When asked about his plans for the future, he answered evasively to avoid giving a direct response.

当被问及他未来的计划时，他含糊其辞地回答，以避免给出直接的回应。

10.The politician spoke evasively during the debate, never addressing the key issues directly.

在辩论中，政治家含糊其辞，从未直接解决关键问题。

11.The detective noticed that the suspect answered evasively, which raised his suspicions.

侦探注意到嫌疑人的回答含糊其辞，这引起了他的怀疑。

12.He responded evasively to the question about his involvement in the project.

他对关于自己参与项目的问题含糊其辞。

作文

In today's fast-paced world, communication is more important than ever. However, there are times when people choose to communicate evasively, avoiding direct answers or clear statements. This behavior can lead to misunderstandings and frustration. For instance, during a job interview, a candidate might be asked about their weaknesses. Instead of providing a straightforward answer, they might respond evasively, saying something like, 'I tend to be a perfectionist.' While this may seem like a clever way to dodge the question, it does not provide the interviewer with the genuine insight they are looking for. The use of evasively in communication can stem from various motivations. Some individuals may feel uncomfortable discussing certain topics, while others may fear that honesty could lead to negative consequences. For example, politicians often respond evasively to tough questions, aiming to maintain their public image rather than addressing the issue at hand. This tactic can be effective in the short term, but it ultimately erodes trust between the politician and their constituents.Moreover, evasively answering questions can have repercussions in personal relationships. When a partner asks about plans for the future, and the other responds evasively, it can create a sense of insecurity and doubt. Clear communication is fundamental in any relationship, and avoiding direct answers can lead to unnecessary tension. In contrast, being open and honest in communication fosters trust and understanding. When individuals express their thoughts and feelings directly, it allows for deeper connections and more meaningful conversations. For instance, if someone is experiencing stress at work, sharing these feelings honestly with friends or family can lead to support and advice. This transparency is far more beneficial than responding evasively, which might leave loved ones feeling confused or helpless.Furthermore, the impact of evasively communicating extends beyond individual relationships. In the workplace, leaders who communicate evasively can create an environment of uncertainty and anxiety. Employees may feel unsure about their roles or the company's direction, leading to decreased morale and productivity. Conversely, leaders who communicate clearly and directly can inspire confidence and motivate their teams.In conclusion, while there may be moments when it seems easier to respond evasively, the long-term consequences of such communication can be detrimental. Honesty and clarity should be prioritized in all forms of communication, whether in personal relationships, professional settings, or public discourse. By choosing to be direct rather than evasively sidestepping issues, we can create a more open and trusting environment. Ultimately, embracing transparency leads to stronger connections and a better understanding among individuals, fostering a healthier society overall.

在当今快节奏的世界中，沟通比以往任何时候都更加重要。然而，有时人们选择以模糊不清的方式进行沟通，避免直接回答或明确表述。这种行为可能导致误解和挫折。例如，在一次工作面试中，面试官可能会问候选人他们的弱点。候选人可能不会给出一个直接的答案，而是模糊不清地回答：“我倾向于追求完美。”虽然这看起来像是一种巧妙的躲避问题的方法，但并没有为面试官提供他们所寻找的真实见解。在沟通中使用模糊不清的方式可能源于各种动机。有些人可能对讨论某些话题感到不舒服，而另一些人则可能担心诚实会导致负面后果。例如，政治家在面对棘手问题时常常会模糊不清地回答，旨在维护他们的公众形象，而不是直接解决问题。这种策略在短期内可能有效，但最终会侵蚀政治家与其选民之间的信任。此外，模糊不清的回答在个人关系中也可能产生后果。当一个伴侣询问未来的计划时，另一个伴侣如果以模糊不清的方式回应，可能会造成不安和怀疑。清晰的沟通是任何关系的基础，避免直接回答可能导致不必要的紧张。相反，开放和诚实的沟通能够促进信任和理解。当个人直接表达自己的想法和感受时，这使得更深层次的联系和更有意义的对话成为可能。例如，如果某人在工作中感到压力，与朋友或家人诚实地分享这些感受可以得到支持和建议。这种透明度远比以模糊不清的方式回应要有益得多，这可能会让亲人感到困惑或无助。此外，模糊不清的沟通影响不仅限于个人关系。在工作场所，以模糊不清方式沟通的领导者可能会创造出一种不确定和焦虑的环境。员工可能会对自己的角色或公司的方向感到不确定，从而导致士气和生产力下降。相反，清晰直接沟通的领导者能够激发信心并激励团队。总之，尽管在某些时刻似乎更容易以模糊不清的方式回应，但这种沟通的长期后果可能是有害的。在所有形式的沟通中，无论是在个人关系、职业环境还是公共话语中，都应优先考虑诚实和清晰。通过选择直接而非模糊不清地回避问题，我们可以创造一个更开放和信任的环境。最终，拥抱透明度将导致更强的联系和更好的理解，从而在个人之间促进一个更健康的社会。