contract of adhesion

简明释义

同意加入合同

英英释义

例句

1.Consumers should be cautious when entering a contract of adhesion 附合契约 as they may contain unfair terms.

消费者在签署附合契约时应谨慎，因为其中可能包含不公平条款。

2.The rental agreement for the apartment was a contract of adhesion 附合契约, with no room for negotiation.

公寓的租赁协议是一个没有协商余地的附合契约。

3.When you sign up for a mobile phone plan, you often enter into a contract of adhesion 附合契约 that favors the provider.

当你注册手机计划时，你通常会签署一个偏向于提供商的附合契约。

4.Many insurance policies are considered a contract of adhesion 附合契约 because the terms are set by the insurer and not negotiable.

许多保险政策被视为附合契约，因为条款由保险公司设定且不可协商。

5.Online services often require users to accept a contract of adhesion 附合契约 before accessing their platforms.

在线服务通常要求用户在访问其平台之前接受附合契约。

作文

A contract of adhesion is a type of agreement where one party has significantly more power than the other in drafting the terms of the contract. This often leads to an imbalance, where the weaker party must accept the terms set forth by the stronger party without any opportunity for negotiation. These contracts are commonly found in various industries, such as insurance, telecommunications, and consumer services. The concept of a contract of adhesion raises important questions about fairness and equity in contractual relationships.To better understand the implications of a contract of adhesion, consider a typical scenario involving a mobile phone service provider. When a customer decides to sign up for a service plan, they often encounter a lengthy agreement filled with legal jargon. Most customers do not have the expertise or resources to negotiate the terms of this contract; instead, they must either accept it as it is or forgo the service altogether. This lack of bargaining power can lead to situations where consumers unwittingly agree to unfavorable terms, such as hidden fees, long-term commitments, or restrictive clauses.The legal system recognizes the potential for abuse in contracts of adhesion. Courts may scrutinize these contracts more closely to ensure that they do not contain unconscionable terms. Unconscionability refers to a situation where the terms of the contract are so one-sided that they shock the conscience. For example, if a contract contains a clause that waives the consumer's right to sue for negligence, a court might find that clause unenforceable if it is deemed excessively unfair.Furthermore, the rise of digital platforms and online services has led to an increase in contracts of adhesion. Users often encounter 'clickwrap' agreements when signing up for online services, where they must agree to the terms before gaining access. These agreements are typically presented in a take-it-or-leave-it manner, leaving users with little choice but to accept the terms if they wish to use the service. This practice raises concerns about whether users truly understand the implications of what they are agreeing to, especially given the complex nature of many digital contracts.In conclusion, while contracts of adhesion serve a practical purpose in facilitating transactions between parties with unequal bargaining power, they also pose significant risks to consumers. It is essential for individuals to be aware of the potential pitfalls associated with these types of contracts and to seek clarification on any unclear terms before agreeing. Additionally, regulatory bodies should continue to monitor and address issues related to contracts of adhesion to protect consumers from unfair practices. By fostering a better understanding of these contracts, we can work towards creating a more equitable landscape for all parties involved in contractual agreements.

附随合同是一种协议，其中一方在起草合同条款时拥有显著的权力。这通常会导致不平衡，弱势一方必须接受强势一方提出的条款，而没有任何谈判的机会。这些合同通常出现在各个行业，如保险、电信和消费者服务中。附随合同的概念引发了关于合同关系中的公平性和公正性的重要问题。为了更好地理解附随合同的影响，考虑一个涉及移动电话服务提供商的典型场景。当客户决定注册服务计划时，他们通常会遇到一份冗长的协议，里面充满了法律术语。大多数客户没有能力或资源去谈判这份合同的条款；相反，他们只能接受原样，或者放弃该服务。这种缺乏议价能力的情况可能导致消费者在不知情的情况下同意不利的条款，例如隐藏费用、长期承诺或限制性条款。法律系统认识到附随合同中潜在的滥用风险。法院可能会更仔细地审查这些合同，以确保它们不包含不合理的条款。不合理性是指合同条款过于单方面，以至于令良知震惊。例如，如果合同中包含一项放弃消费者因疏忽而起诉的权利的条款，法院可能会发现该条款不可执行，如果其被认为过于不公平。此外，数字平台和在线服务的兴起导致附随合同的增加。用户在注册在线服务时经常会遇到“点击协议”，他们必须在获得访问权限之前同意条款。这些协议通常以“接受或放弃”的方式呈现，使用户几乎没有选择，只能在希望使用该服务时接受条款。这种做法引发了人们对用户是否真正理解他们所同意内容的担忧，特别是考虑到许多数字合同的复杂性。总之，尽管附随合同在促进双方不平等的交易中发挥了实用作用，但它们也对消费者构成了重大风险。个人必须意识到与这些类型的合同相关的潜在陷阱，并在同意之前寻求澄清任何不明确的条款。此外，监管机构应继续监测和解决与附随合同相关的问题，以保护消费者免受不公平行为的侵害。通过加深对这些合同的理解，我们可以朝着为所有参与合同协议的各方创造更公平的环境而努力。