suspension of right

简明释义

停止权利

英英释义

例句

1.Employees faced a suspension of right to access certain company resources after breaching policy.

员工在违反政策后面临访问某些公司资源的权利被暂停。

2.The school imposed a suspension of right to use electronic devices during exams.

学校在考试期间对使用电子设备实施了权利的暂停。

3.During the emergency, there was a suspension of right to free speech to maintain public order.

在紧急情况下，出于维护公共秩序的考虑，自由言论的权利被暂停。

4.The government announced a temporary suspension of right to protest peacefully due to security concerns.

政府宣布因安全考虑临时暂停抗议的权利。

5.The court ruled for a suspension of right to appeal in cases involving national security.

法院裁定在涉及国家安全的案件中暂停上诉的权利。

作文

The concept of the suspension of right is a significant legal principle that often arises in discussions about civil liberties and the enforcement of laws. This principle refers to the temporary cessation of certain rights or privileges granted to individuals, usually under specific circumstances such as during a state of emergency or when an individual poses a threat to public safety. Understanding the suspension of right is crucial for both citizens and lawmakers, as it raises important questions about the balance between security and freedom.In democratic societies, individual rights are typically protected by constitutions and legal frameworks. However, there are instances where governments may need to impose restrictions on these rights to maintain order or protect the welfare of the public. For example, during a national crisis, such as a natural disaster or a terrorist attack, authorities might enact a suspension of right to ensure that emergency services can operate effectively without interference. This could involve limiting the right to assemble, restricting freedom of movement, or even curtailing freedom of speech in certain contexts.While the suspension of right can be justified in extreme situations, it is essential to recognize the potential for abuse. History has shown that governments may exploit emergencies to extend their powers and suppress dissent. For instance, during wartime, many countries have enacted laws that significantly limit civil liberties under the guise of national security. The challenge lies in ensuring that any suspension of right is temporary, proportionate, and subject to oversight. Moreover, the suspension of right must always be accompanied by clear communication from the government regarding the reasons for the suspension and the expected duration. Transparency is vital in maintaining public trust and preventing panic. Citizens should be informed about their rights and the specific limitations imposed upon them. This helps to mitigate feelings of fear and uncertainty that can arise during crises.In addition, the legal framework surrounding the suspension of right varies from one country to another. Some nations have explicit provisions in their constitutions that outline the conditions under which rights can be suspended, while others rely on general laws or executive orders. It is crucial for individuals to understand the laws applicable in their jurisdiction to know their rights and the extent to which they can be curtailed.Furthermore, the role of the judiciary is pivotal in reviewing cases involving the suspension of right. Courts must ensure that any suspension is justified and that it does not infringe upon fundamental human rights. Judicial oversight serves as a check against potential government overreach and protects individuals from arbitrary actions.In conclusion, the suspension of right is a complex issue that balances the need for security with the preservation of individual freedoms. While there are legitimate reasons for suspending rights during emergencies, safeguards must be in place to prevent abuse and ensure that such measures are temporary and transparent. As responsible citizens, it is our duty to remain vigilant and advocate for our rights, even in times of crisis. Understanding the implications of the suspension of right empowers us to engage in meaningful discussions about the limits of government power and the protection of civil liberties.

“权利的暂停”这一概念是一个重要的法律原则，常常在关于公民自由和法律执行的讨论中出现。这个原则指的是在特定情况下，例如在紧急状态下，或当个人对公共安全构成威胁时，暂时停止给予个人某些权利或特权。理解“权利的暂停”对公民和立法者都至关重要，因为它引发了关于安全与自由之间平衡的重要问题。在民主社会中，个人权利通常受到宪法和法律框架的保护。然而，政府在维持秩序或保护公众福利时，有时需要对这些权利施加限制。例如，在国家危机期间，如自然灾害或恐怖袭击，相关当局可能会实施“权利的暂停”，以确保紧急服务能够有效运作而不受干扰。这可能涉及限制集会权、限制行动自由，甚至在某些情况下限制言论自由。虽然在极端情况下可以合理化“权利的暂停”，但必须认识到滥用的潜力。历史已经证明，政府可能会利用紧急情况来扩大其权力并压制异议。例如，在战争时期，许多国家通过法律显著限制公民自由，以国家安全为名。挑战在于确保任何“权利的暂停”都是临时的、适度的，并且受到监督。此外，“权利的暂停”必须始终伴随着政府对暂停原因和预期持续时间的清晰沟通。透明度在维护公众信任和防止恐慌方面至关重要。公民应被告知他们的权利以及施加的具体限制。这有助于减轻危机期间可能出现的恐惧和不确定感。此外，围绕“权利的暂停”的法律框架因国而异。一些国家的宪法中明确规定了可以暂停权利的条件，而其他国家则依赖于一般法律或行政命令。个人了解适用于其管辖区的法律至关重要，以便知道自己的权利及其被限制的程度。此外，司法机构在审查涉及“权利的暂停”的案件中发挥着关键作用。法院必须确保任何暂停都是合理的，并且不侵犯基本人权。司法监督作为对政府潜在过度扩张的制衡，保护个人免受任意行为的侵害。总之，“权利的暂停”是一个复杂的问题，它在安全需求与个人自由的保护之间取得平衡。尽管在紧急情况下暂停权利有合理的理由，但必须采取保障措施以防止滥用，并确保此类措施是临时的和透明的。作为负责任的公民，我们有责任保持警惕，倡导我们的权利，即使在危机时期。理解“权利的暂停”的影响使我们能够参与有关政府权力限制和公民自由保护的有意义讨论。