burden of persuasion

简明释义

提供说明的责任

英英释义

例句

1.The lawyer explained that the burden of persuasion 说服责任 lies with the party making the allegations.

律师解释说，说服责任 burden of persuasion 在于提出指控的一方。

2.In a court case, the plaintiff has the burden of persuasion 说服责任 to prove their claims.

在法庭案件中，原告有说服责任 burden of persuasion 来证明他们的主张。

3.The teacher reminded students that in their presentations, they have the burden of persuasion 说服责任 to engage their audience.

老师提醒学生，在他们的演示中，他们有说服责任 burden of persuasion 来吸引观众。

4.During the debate, the candidate must carry the burden of persuasion 说服责任 to convince voters of their policies.

在辩论中，候选人必须承担说服责任 burden of persuasion 以说服选民相信他们的政策。

5.In negotiations, one side may take on the burden of persuasion 说服责任 to justify their demands.

在谈判中，一方可能承担说服责任 burden of persuasion 来证明他们的要求。

作文

In the realm of communication and argumentation, the concept of the burden of persuasion plays a crucial role in determining who is responsible for convincing others of a particular viewpoint or claim. This term refers to the obligation placed upon a party to present sufficient evidence and reasoning to support their assertions, thereby persuading the audience to accept their perspective. Understanding this concept is essential not only in legal contexts but also in everyday discussions and debates.To illustrate the significance of the burden of persuasion, consider a courtroom scenario. In a trial, the prosecution bears the burden of persuasion to prove the defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. This means that it is their responsibility to provide compelling evidence and arguments that convince the jury of the defendant's culpability. If the prosecution fails to meet this burden, the jury must acquit the defendant, regardless of any doubts they may have. This principle underscores the importance of having a clear and convincing case when trying to persuade others.Moreover, the burden of persuasion can shift throughout a discussion or debate. For instance, in a political debate, a candidate may initially bear the burden of persuasion to explain their policies and convince voters of their viability. However, if their opponent presents a compelling counterargument, the burden of persuasion may shift back to the first candidate, who must then address the counterpoints effectively to maintain support.In everyday conversations, understanding the burden of persuasion can enhance our ability to engage in constructive dialogue. When we express our opinions, we should be aware that we may need to justify our views with logical reasoning and credible evidence. This awareness encourages us to think critically about our positions and to anticipate potential objections from others. By doing so, we not only strengthen our arguments but also foster a more respectful and informed exchange of ideas.Furthermore, recognizing the burden of persuasion helps us navigate discussions where misinformation or emotional appeals may cloud judgment. In an age where social media can amplify misleading information, being mindful of this concept allows us to challenge unfounded claims and demand evidence from those who make them. It empowers us to hold ourselves and others accountable for the assertions we make, ultimately leading to more rational and fact-based conversations.In conclusion, the burden of persuasion is a fundamental aspect of effective communication and argumentation. Whether in legal settings, political debates, or everyday discussions, recognizing who holds this burden can significantly impact the outcome of a conversation. By understanding and embracing the burden of persuasion, we can enhance our critical thinking skills, promote accountability, and contribute to more meaningful exchanges of ideas. Ultimately, this awareness not only benefits us as individuals but also strengthens the fabric of our society by fostering a culture of reasoned discourse and informed decision-making.

在交流和论证的领域中，‘burden of persuasion’这一概念在确定谁负责说服他人接受特定观点或主张方面起着至关重要的作用。这个术语指的是一方必须提出足够的证据和推理以支持其主张，从而说服观众接受其观点的义务。理解这一概念不仅在法律背景下至关重要，而且在日常讨论和辩论中也是如此。为了说明‘burden of persuasion’的重要性，可以考虑一个法庭场景。在审判中，控方承担着‘burden of persuasion’，必须在合理怀疑之外证明被告的罪行。这意味着他们有责任提供令人信服的证据和论点，以说服陪审团相信被告的有罪。如果控方未能满足这一负担，陪审团必须宣判被告无罪，无论他们可能有多少疑虑。这一原则强调了在试图说服他人时，拥有明确而令人信服的案例的重要性。此外，‘burden of persuasion’在讨论或辩论中可以转移。例如，在政治辩论中，候选人最初可能承担着‘burden of persuasion’，需要解释他们的政策并说服选民其可行性。然而，如果他们的对手提出了令人信服的反驳，‘burden of persuasion’可能会转回到第一位候选人身上，他们必须有效地回应反对意见以维持支持。在日常对话中，理解‘burden of persuasion’可以增强我们参与建设性对话的能力。当我们表达观点时，我们应意识到可能需要用逻辑推理和可信证据来证明我们的观点。这种意识促使我们批判性地思考自己的立场，并预见他人的潜在反对意见。通过这样做，我们不仅增强了自己的论点，还促进了更尊重和知情的思想交流。此外，认识到‘burden of persuasion’帮助我们在错误信息或情感诉求可能模糊判断的讨论中导航。在社交媒体能够放大误导性信息的时代，关注这一概念使我们能够挑战毫无根据的主张，并要求那些提出主张的人提供证据。这赋予我们权力，使我们对自己和他人所作出的主张负责，最终导致更理性和基于事实的对话。总之，‘burden of persuasion’是有效沟通和论证的基本方面。无论是在法律环境、政治辩论还是日常讨论中，认识到谁承担这一负担可以显著影响对话的结果。通过理解和接受‘burden of persuasion’，我们可以增强我们的批判性思维能力，促进问责制，并为更有意义的思想交流做出贡献。最终，这种意识不仅使我们个人受益，还通过促进理性讨论和知情决策的文化，增强了我们社会的结构。