cause of action; ground of action

简明释义

提出诉讼的理由

英英释义

例句

1.A clear ground of action 诉讼理由 must be presented in the initial complaint.

在初步投诉中必须提出明确的诉讼理由。

2.The defendant argued that there was no cause of action 诉因 to support the claims made against him.

被告辩称没有任何支持对他提出的指控的诉因。

3.The judge dismissed the case due to lack of cause of action 诉因.

法官因缺乏诉因而驳回了此案。

4.In order to win the case, the lawyer needed to prove the ground of action 诉讼理由 was valid.

为了赢得案件，律师需要证明诉讼理由是有效的。

5.The plaintiff must establish a valid cause of action 诉因 to proceed with the lawsuit.

原告必须建立一个有效的诉因以继续进行诉讼。

作文

In the realm of law, understanding the terms cause of action and ground of action is essential for both legal practitioners and individuals navigating the judicial system. A cause of action, or 诉因 in Chinese, refers to a set of facts or legal reasons that give rise to a right to sue. It is the foundation upon which a legal claim is built. For instance, if someone suffers harm due to another's negligence, the injured party has a cause of action for negligence. This concept is crucial because it defines the conditions under which a lawsuit can be initiated, ensuring that there is a legitimate reason for seeking legal remedy.On the other hand, the term ground of action, or 诉讼基础 in Chinese, is often used interchangeably with cause of action, but it can also refer more specifically to the underlying legal principles that support a claim. While a cause of action outlines the factual scenario that prompts a lawsuit, the ground of action may delve deeper into the specific legal statutes or precedents that substantiate the claim. For example, in a breach of contract case, the cause of action would be the failure to perform contractual obligations, while the ground of action could involve referencing specific sections of contract law that validate the plaintiff's position.The distinction between these two terms is significant in legal practice. When drafting legal documents, attorneys must clearly articulate the cause of action to ensure that the court understands the basis of the claim. Failure to do so may result in a dismissal of the case or an unfavorable ruling. Moreover, understanding the ground of action allows lawyers to construct a more compelling argument by linking the facts of the case to established legal principles. This not only strengthens the case but also demonstrates a thorough understanding of the law.In practical terms, consider a scenario where a person files a lawsuit for personal injury after slipping on a wet floor in a store. The cause of action here is based on negligence—the store’s failure to maintain a safe environment. The ground of action, however, might include references to local safety regulations and previous case law that establishes the duty of care owed by businesses to their customers. By effectively articulating both the cause of action and the ground of action, the plaintiff enhances their chances of success in court.Furthermore, understanding these concepts is important not only for legal professionals but also for individuals who may find themselves involved in legal disputes. Knowing what constitutes a cause of action empowers individuals to assess whether they have a valid claim and to seek appropriate legal counsel. Similarly, recognizing the ground of action helps them understand the legal framework that supports their case, which can be invaluable during negotiations or court proceedings.In conclusion, the terms cause of action and ground of action play pivotal roles in the legal landscape. They provide the necessary structure for legal claims and help delineate the relationship between facts and law. Whether one is a seasoned attorney or an individual facing legal challenges, grasping these concepts can significantly impact the outcome of legal proceedings. As such, a comprehensive understanding of both terms is not just beneficial but essential for anyone engaged in the legal system.

在法律领域，理解“诉因”和“诉讼基础”这两个术语对法律从业者和个人在司法系统中导航至关重要。“诉因”指的是一组事实或法律理由，这些理由构成了提起诉讼的权利。它是法律索赔的基础。例如，如果某人因他人的过失而受到伤害，受害方就有了过失的“诉因”。这一概念至关重要，因为它定义了可以启动诉讼的条件，确保寻求法律救济有合理的理由。另一方面，“诉讼基础”一词通常与“诉因”可以互换使用，但它也可以更具体地指支持索赔的基本法律原则。当“诉因”概述了促使诉讼的事实情境时，“诉讼基础”可能更深入地探讨支持索赔的特定法律法规或判例法。例如，在违约案件中，“诉因”将是未履行合同义务，而“诉讼基础”可能涉及引用具体的合同法条款，以验证原告的立场。这两个术语之间的区别在法律实践中具有重要意义。在起草法律文件时，律师必须清楚地阐明“诉因”，以确保法庭理解索赔的基础。如果未能做到这一点，可能会导致案件被驳回或裁决不利。此外，理解“诉讼基础”使律师能够通过将案件事实与既定法律原则联系起来，从而构建更有说服力的论据。这不仅增强了案件的力量，还展示了对法律的全面理解。在实际情况下，考虑一个场景，一个人在商店的湿地板上滑倒后提起人身伤害诉讼。这里的“诉因”基于过失——商店未能维护安全的环境。然而，“诉讼基础”可能包括对地方安全法规和确立企业对顾客所负照顾义务的先前案例法的引用。通过有效地阐明“诉因”和“诉讼基础”，原告增强了他们在法庭上成功的机会。此外，理解这些概念对法律专业人士以及可能卷入法律争议的个人都很重要。知道什么构成“诉因”使个人能够评估自己是否有有效的索赔，并寻求适当的法律咨询。同样，认识到“诉讼基础”帮助他们理解支持其案件的法律框架，这在谈判或法庭程序中可能是无价的。总之，“诉因”和“诉讼基础”这两个术语在法律领域中发挥着关键作用。它们为法律索赔提供了必要的结构，并帮助划定事实与法律之间的关系。无论是经验丰富的律师还是面临法律挑战的个人，掌握这些概念都可能对法律程序的结果产生重大影响。因此，对这两个术语的全面理解不仅有益，而且对任何参与法律系统的人来说都是必不可少的。