emergency powers

简明释义

特命全权

英英释义

例句

1.The mayor declared a state of emergency and activated emergency powers to ensure public safety.

市长宣布进入紧急状态，并启动紧急权力以确保公共安全。

2.During the pandemic, many governments exercised emergency powers to impose lockdowns.

在疫情期间，许多政府行使了紧急权力以实施封锁。

3.Critics argue that the use of emergency powers can lead to abuse and erosion of civil liberties.

批评者认为，使用紧急权力可能导致滥用和公民自由的侵蚀。

4.The president invoked emergency powers to address the natural disaster affecting the region.

总统动用了紧急权力来应对影响该地区的自然灾害。

5.After the terrorist attack, the government extended its emergency powers for an additional six months.

在恐怖袭击后，政府将其紧急权力延长了六个月。

作文

In times of crisis, governments often resort to measures that allow them to act swiftly and decisively. One such measure is the invocation of emergency powers, which grants authorities the ability to bypass normal legislative procedures in order to address urgent situations effectively. The concept of emergency powers has been a topic of debate among scholars, politicians, and citizens alike, as it raises important questions about the balance between security and civil liberties. Historically, emergency powers have been employed during wars, natural disasters, and public health crises. For instance, during World War II, many countries enacted laws that enabled their governments to mobilize resources and implement strict regulations to ensure national security. Similarly, the COVID-19 pandemic saw numerous nations declaring states of emergency, allowing them to impose lockdowns, enforce mask mandates, and expedite vaccine distribution. While the use of emergency powers can be justified in certain situations, it is crucial to examine the potential risks involved. One major concern is the possibility of abuse of power. When governments are granted extraordinary authority, there is a tendency for some leaders to extend these powers beyond their intended scope. This can lead to authoritarianism, where the government suppresses dissent and curtails individual freedoms under the guise of protecting public safety. Moreover, the temporary nature of emergency powers can become problematic. What begins as a necessary response to an immediate threat can evolve into a prolonged state of emergency, with governments reluctant to relinquish their newfound powers. This phenomenon is often referred to as 'creeping authoritarianism,' where democratic norms are gradually eroded over time. Therefore, it is essential for legislatures to establish clear parameters and oversight mechanisms when enacting emergency powers, ensuring that they are used only when absolutely necessary and for a limited duration. Public perception also plays a vital role in the implementation of emergency powers. Citizens may initially support such measures during a crisis, believing that they are in the best interest of public safety. However, as time passes and the situation stabilizes, public sentiment can shift. People may begin to question the necessity of continued restrictions and demand the restoration of their rights. This tension between security and liberty is a delicate balancing act that governments must navigate carefully. In conclusion, while emergency powers can be an essential tool for governments facing crises, they come with significant responsibilities and risks. It is imperative that such powers are exercised judiciously, with proper checks and balances in place to prevent abuse. As history has shown, the misuse of emergency powers can have lasting consequences for democracy and civil liberties. Ultimately, the challenge lies in finding a way to protect society during emergencies without compromising the very freedoms that define it.

在危机时期，政府常常采取措施，使其能够迅速而果断地行动。其中一种措施就是调用紧急权力，这使当局能够绕过正常的立法程序，以有效应对紧急情况。紧急权力的概念一直是学者、政治家和公民之间辩论的话题，因为它引发了关于安全与公民自由之间平衡的重要问题。历史上，紧急权力曾在战争、自然灾害和公共健康危机期间被使用。例如，在第二次世界大战期间，许多国家颁布法律，使其政府能够动员资源并实施严格的规定，以确保国家安全。同样，COVID-19大流行使许多国家宣布进入紧急状态，使其能够实施封锁、强制佩戴口罩和加速疫苗分发。虽然在某些情况下，使用紧急权力是可以辩护的，但审视其中可能存在的风险至关重要。一个主要关注点是滥用权力的可能性。当政府被赋予非凡的权力时，一些领导人往往会将这些权力扩展到原本意图之外。这可能导致威权主义，政府以保护公众安全为名压制异议，限制个人自由。此外，紧急权力的临时性质可能变得成问题。最初作为对即时威胁的必要回应的措施，可能演变为长期的紧急状态，政府不愿放弃其新获得的权力。这种现象通常被称为“渐进式威权主义”，即民主规范随着时间的推移逐渐被侵蚀。因此，在制定紧急权力时，立法机构必须建立明确的参数和监督机制，以确保这些权力仅在绝对必要时使用，并且持续时间有限。公众感知在紧急权力的实施中也发挥着至关重要的作用。在危机期间，公民可能最初支持这些措施，认为它们符合公众安全的最佳利益。然而，随着时间的推移，情况稳定后，公众情绪可能会发生转变。人们可能开始质疑继续限制的必要性，并要求恢复他们的权利。这种安全与自由之间的紧张关系是政府必须谨慎处理的微妙平衡。总之，尽管紧急权力可以成为面临危机的政府的重要工具，但它们伴随着重大责任和风险。至关重要的是，这些权力必须谨慎行使，并且必须有适当的制衡机制，以防止滥用。历史表明，滥用紧急权力可能对民主和公民自由产生持久影响。最终，挑战在于找到在紧急情况下保护社会而不妨碍定义社会的自由的方法。