preferential system

简明释义

特惠制

英英释义

例句

1.The city council is considering a preferential system for public transport users to encourage eco-friendly commuting.

市议会正在考虑为公共交通用户设立一个优惠制度，以鼓励环保通勤。

2.Under the preferential system, certain products are taxed at a lower rate to promote local manufacturing.

根据优惠制度，某些产品的税率较低，以促进本地制造业。

3.The airline offers a preferential system for frequent flyers, allowing them to earn points faster.

该航空公司为常旅客提供了一个优惠制度，使他们更快地赚取积分。

4.In the new policy, students from low-income families will benefit from a preferential system for college admissions.

在新政策中，来自低收入家庭的学生将受益于大学录取的优惠制度。

5.The government has implemented a preferential system to support small businesses during economic downturns.

政府实施了一套优惠制度，以支持在经济衰退期间的小型企业。

作文

In today's world, the concept of a preferential system plays a significant role in various sectors, including education, employment, and public services. A preferential system refers to a framework or policy that grants special advantages or privileges to certain individuals or groups over others. This approach is often implemented to promote equality, diversity, and inclusion, particularly for historically marginalized communities. However, the effectiveness and fairness of such systems are frequently debated.One prominent example of a preferential system is affirmative action in higher education. Many universities have adopted policies that give preference to applicants from underrepresented racial or ethnic backgrounds. The rationale behind this is to level the playing field, ensuring that students who may have faced systemic barriers in their educational journeys have a fair chance at admission. Supporters argue that these policies help to create a more diverse student body, which enriches the learning environment for all students. They believe that a preferential system can lead to greater social mobility and a reduction in inequality.On the other hand, critics of preferential systems often argue that they can lead to reverse discrimination, where qualified candidates from majority groups are overlooked in favor of less qualified candidates from minority groups. This contention raises questions about meritocracy and whether it is fair to prioritize certain characteristics over others. Critics also contend that such systems can perpetuate division and resentment among different groups, undermining the very goals they aim to achieve.In the workplace, preferential systems can manifest as diversity hiring initiatives. Companies may implement policies that seek to increase the representation of women, people of color, and other minorities within their workforce. While these efforts are well-intentioned, they can sometimes lead to perceptions of unfairness among employees who feel that promotions or job offers are being awarded based on demographics rather than qualifications or performance. Thus, the challenge lies in balancing the need for diversity with the principles of fairness and merit.Moreover, preferential systems are not limited to social issues; they can also be found in economic policies. For instance, governments may offer tax incentives or subsidies to specific industries or businesses to stimulate growth in those areas. While this can lead to economic development, it may also create an uneven playing field, where some companies thrive due to government support while others struggle to compete.Ultimately, the implementation of a preferential system requires careful consideration and ongoing evaluation. It is crucial to assess the outcomes of such systems to determine whether they are achieving their intended goals without creating new forms of inequality. Open dialogue and transparency in how these systems are structured and executed can help mitigate concerns and foster a more inclusive society.In conclusion, while preferential systems aim to address historical injustices and promote equality, they come with complex challenges. Striking a balance between providing opportunities for disadvantaged groups and maintaining fairness for all individuals is essential. As society continues to evolve, so too must our understanding and application of preferential systems, ensuring they serve to uplift rather than divide. Overall, the discourse surrounding preferential systems is vital in shaping policies that reflect our values of equity and justice, ultimately contributing to a more harmonious society.

在当今世界，优先制度的概念在教育、就业和公共服务等各个领域发挥着重要作用。优先制度是指一种框架或政策，为某些个人或群体提供特别的优势或特权。这种方法通常被实施以促进平等、多样性和包容性，特别是针对历史上被边缘化的社区。然而，这些制度的有效性和公平性常常受到争议。一个显著的例子是高等教育中的平权行动。许多大学采用政策，优先考虑来自代表性不足的种族或民族背景的申请者。这样做的理由是为了平衡竞争环境，确保那些在教育过程中可能面临系统性障碍的学生有公平的入学机会。支持者认为，这些政策有助于创造一个更具多样性的学生群体，从而丰富所有学生的学习环境。他们相信，优先制度可以带来更大的社会流动性和减少不平等。另一方面，优先制度的批评者常常认为，这可能导致反向歧视，即来自多数群体的合格候选人被忽视，而较少合格的少数群体候选人却被优先考虑。这一争论引发了关于功绩主义的问题，以及优先考虑某些特征是否公平。批评者还认为，这种制度可能会加剧不同群体之间的分裂和怨恨，削弱其旨在实现的目标。在职场中，优先制度可以表现为多样性招聘倡议。公司可能会实施政策，寻求增加女性、有色人种及其他少数群体在其劳动力中的代表性。虽然这些努力出于良好意图，但有时可能导致员工对晋升或工作机会的看法产生不公平感，他们认为这些机会是基于人口统计数据而非资格或表现。因此，挑战在于平衡多样性需求与公平和功绩原则。此外，优先制度不仅限于社会问题，也可以在经济政策中找到。例如，政府可能会向特定行业或企业提供税收优惠或补贴，以刺激这些领域的发展。虽然这可以促进经济发展，但也可能造成不平等的竞争环境，一些公司因政府支持而蓬勃发展，而其他公司则难以竞争。最终，实施优先制度需要仔细考虑和持续评估。至关重要的是评估这些制度的结果，以确定它们是否实现了预期目标，而不创造新的不平等。开放的对话和透明的制度结构与执行方式，可以帮助减轻担忧，促进一个更具包容性的社会。总之，尽管优先制度旨在解决历史不公并促进平等，但它们也伴随着复杂的挑战。在为弱势群体提供机会与维护所有个人的公平之间取得平衡至关重要。随着社会的不断发展，我们对优先制度的理解和应用也必须不断演变，确保它们能够提升而非分裂。总体而言，围绕优先制度的讨论对于塑造反映我们公平和正义价值观的政策至关重要，最终有助于建立一个更加和谐的社会。