selective grants

简明释义

特定补贴

英英释义

例句

1.To enhance educational opportunities, the school district is offering selective grants for technology upgrades.

为了提升教育机会，学区正在提供用于技术升级的选择性补助。

2.Universities often rely on selective grants to fund research projects that align with their strategic goals.

大学通常依靠选择性补助来资助与其战略目标一致的研究项目。

3.Non-profit organizations can apply for selective grants to support specific initiatives that benefit the community.

非营利组织可以申请选择性补助以支持有益于社区的特定项目。

4.The foundation provides selective grants to artists whose work addresses social issues.

该基金会向那些作品关注社会问题的艺术家提供选择性补助。

5.The government announced a new program for providing selective grants to small businesses affected by the pandemic.

政府宣布了一项新计划，为受到疫情影响的小企业提供选择性补助。

作文

In recent years, the concept of selective grants has gained significant attention in both academic and policy-making circles. These are financial aids provided by governments or organizations that are specifically targeted towards certain individuals, groups, or projects that meet predefined criteria. The primary aim of selective grants is to ensure that resources are allocated efficiently and effectively to foster development in areas deemed most critical. This essay will explore the importance, advantages, and potential drawbacks of selective grants, highlighting their role in promoting social equity and economic growth.One of the key advantages of selective grants is their ability to address specific needs within a community. For instance, educational grants may be given only to students from low-income families, thereby ensuring that those who are most disadvantaged have access to quality education. This targeted approach can lead to significant improvements in social mobility and can help break the cycle of poverty. By focusing resources on those who need them the most, selective grants play a vital role in promoting social equity.Moreover, selective grants can stimulate innovation and development in various sectors. For example, research institutions may receive funding for projects that align with national priorities, such as renewable energy or healthcare advancements. By providing financial support to initiatives that have the potential for high impact, selective grants can drive progress in critical areas, ultimately benefiting society as a whole.However, there are also potential drawbacks associated with selective grants. One concern is that the selection criteria may inadvertently exclude deserving candidates or projects. If the criteria are too rigid or poorly defined, some individuals or organizations that could greatly benefit from funding might be overlooked. This can lead to inequalities in resource distribution and may undermine the very goals that selective grants aim to achieve.Additionally, the reliance on selective grants can create a culture of dependency among recipients. Organizations or individuals who frequently receive funding may become less inclined to seek alternative sources of income or develop self-sustaining models. This dependency can stifle innovation and reduce the overall effectiveness of the funding system.In conclusion, selective grants serve as a crucial tool for addressing specific needs and promoting development in targeted areas. Their ability to allocate resources efficiently and effectively can lead to improved social equity and economic growth. However, it is essential for policymakers to carefully consider the selection criteria and the long-term implications of these grants. By doing so, they can maximize the benefits of selective grants while minimizing potential drawbacks, ultimately fostering a more equitable and prosperous society.

近年来，选择性补助这一概念在学术界和政策制定圈中引起了广泛关注。这些是由政府或组织提供的财务援助，专门针对符合预定义标准的特定个人、群体或项目。选择性补助的主要目的是确保资源的高效和有效分配，以促进被认为最关键领域的发展。本文将探讨选择性补助的重要性、优势及潜在缺点，强调其在促进社会公平和经济增长中的作用。选择性补助的一个关键优势在于其能够解决社区内的特定需求。例如，教育补助可能仅给予来自低收入家庭的学生，从而确保那些最处于不利地位的人能够获得优质教育。这种针对性的做法可以显著改善社会流动性，并有助于打破贫困循环。通过将资源集中在最需要帮助的人身上，选择性补助在促进社会公平方面发挥了至关重要的作用。此外，选择性补助可以刺激各个领域的创新和发展。例如，研究机构可能会获得与国家优先事项相关的项目资金，例如可再生能源或医疗保健的进步。通过为具有高影响潜力的倡议提供财政支持，选择性补助可以推动关键领域的进展，最终使整个社会受益。然而，与选择性补助相关的潜在缺点也不容忽视。一个担忧是，选择标准可能无意中排除应得的候选人或项目。如果标准过于严格或定义不清，一些能够从资金中获益的个人或组织可能会被忽视。这可能导致资源分配的不平等，并可能削弱选择性补助旨在实现的目标。此外，依赖于选择性补助可能会在接受者中造成一种依赖文化。频繁获得资助的组织或个人可能会减少寻求其他收入来源或发展自给自足模式的意愿。这种依赖可能会抑制创新，降低资金系统的整体有效性。总之，选择性补助作为解决特定需求和促进目标领域发展的重要工具，其有效和高效的资源分配能力可以带来社会公平和经济增长的改善。然而，政策制定者必须仔细考虑选择标准及这些补助的长期影响。通过这样做，他们可以最大化选择性补助的好处，同时最小化潜在的缺点，最终促进一个更加公平和繁荣的社会。