sugar tax; sugar duty

简明释义

糖税

英英释义

例句

1.After the introduction of the sugar tax, sales of soda decreased significantly.

在实施糖税后，汽水的销量显著下降。

2.Many countries have introduced a sugar duty on sugary drinks to encourage healthier choices.

许多国家对含糖饮料征收了糖费，以鼓励更健康的选择。

3.Critics argue that the sugar tax disproportionately affects low-income families.

批评者认为，糖税对低收入家庭的影响过大。

4.The government implemented a sugar tax to combat rising obesity rates.

政府实施了糖税以应对日益上升的肥胖率。

5.The sugar duty has led manufacturers to reformulate their products to reduce sugar content.

由于糖费的实施，制造商不得不重新配方以减少糖分含量。

作文

In recent years, the global epidemic of obesity and related health issues has prompted governments around the world to consider various measures to combat these problems. One such measure is the implementation of a sugar tax, also known as sugar duty. This policy aims to reduce the consumption of sugary drinks and foods by imposing a financial levy on products that contain high levels of sugar. The idea behind the sugar tax is simple: by increasing the price of sugary items, consumers will be discouraged from purchasing them, leading to healthier choices and ultimately reducing obesity rates.The effectiveness of the sugar tax can be seen in several countries that have adopted this policy. For instance, Mexico introduced a sugar tax in 2014, which resulted in a significant drop in the sales of sugary beverages. Studies showed that within the first year of implementation, the consumption of these drinks decreased by 12%. This decline in sugary drink consumption is crucial because excessive sugar intake is linked to various health problems, including diabetes, heart disease, and dental issues.Furthermore, the revenue generated from the sugar duty can be utilized to fund public health initiatives. Governments can allocate these funds to promote healthier lifestyles, provide education on nutrition, and improve access to healthy food options. In the UK, for example, the revenue from the sugar tax has been directed towards programs aimed at reducing childhood obesity, which is a growing concern among health officials.Critics of the sugar tax argue that it disproportionately affects low-income families who may rely on cheaper sugary options. However, proponents believe that the long-term health benefits outweigh the short-term economic burden. Additionally, the sugar tax can serve as a catalyst for manufacturers to reformulate their products, reducing sugar content and creating healthier alternatives. This shift not only benefits consumers but also encourages the food industry to prioritize public health.Implementing a sugar tax is not without its challenges. There are concerns about the potential for black markets to emerge for untaxed sugary products, as well as the need for effective enforcement mechanisms. Additionally, there is a risk that consumers may switch to other unhealthy alternatives that are not taxed, undermining the goal of promoting overall health.In conclusion, the sugar tax or sugar duty represents a proactive approach to tackling the obesity epidemic and improving public health. While there are valid concerns regarding its impact on low-income families and potential market shifts, the evidence from countries that have implemented this policy suggests that it can lead to significant reductions in sugar consumption and associated health risks. By investing in public health initiatives with the revenue generated from the sugar tax, governments can create a healthier future for their citizens. Ultimately, the success of the sugar duty hinges on a comprehensive strategy that includes education, reformulation of products, and access to healthier choices.

近年来，全球肥胖和相关健康问题的流行促使世界各国政府考虑各种措施来应对这些问题。其中一种措施是实施sugar tax，也称为sugar duty。该政策旨在通过对含有高糖分的产品征收财务税收，减少人们对含糖饮料和食品的消费。sugar tax背后的理念很简单：通过提高含糖商品的价格，消费者将会受到抑制，从而导致更健康的选择，并最终降低肥胖率。实施sugar tax的有效性可以在一些采用该政策的国家中看到。例如，墨西哥在2014年引入了sugar tax，这导致含糖饮料的销售显著下降。研究表明，在实施的第一年内，这些饮料的消费量减少了12%。这一含糖饮料消费的下降至关重要，因为过量摄入糖分与多种健康问题相关，包括糖尿病、心脏病和牙齿问题。此外，来自sugar duty的收入可以用于资助公共卫生项目。各国政府可以将这些资金用于促进更健康的生活方式、提供营养教育以及改善健康食品的获取。在英国，例如，来自sugar tax的收入已被用于旨在减少儿童肥胖的项目，这在健康官员中日益成为一个关注点。sugar tax的批评者认为，它对依赖廉价含糖选项的低收入家庭产生了不成比例的影响。然而，支持者认为，长期的健康益处超过了短期的经济负担。此外，sugar tax可以作为制造商重新配方的催化剂，减少糖分含量并创造更健康的替代品。这一转变不仅有利于消费者，也鼓励食品行业优先考虑公共健康。实施sugar tax并非没有挑战。人们担心可能会出现黑市交易未征税的含糖产品，以及需要有效的执法机制。此外，消费者可能会转向其他未征税的不健康替代品，从而削弱促进整体健康的目标。总之，sugar tax或sugar duty代表了一种积极应对肥胖流行和改善公共健康的方法。尽管关于其对低收入家庭影响和潜在市场转变的担忧是合理的，但实施该政策的国家的证据表明，它可以显著减少糖分消费及相关健康风险。通过利用sugar tax产生的收入投资公共卫生项目，各国政府可以为其公民创造一个更健康的未来。最终，sugar duty的成功取决于包括教育、产品重新配方和获取更健康选择的综合策略。