kangaroo court

简明释义

私设法庭

英英释义

例句

1.The company's internal investigation felt like a kangaroo court, lacking any real fairness or transparency.

公司的内部调查感觉像是一个流氓法庭，缺乏真正的公正和透明度。

2.The hastily arranged meeting was criticized as a kangaroo court because it did not allow for proper legal representation.

匆忙安排的会议被批评为流氓法庭，因为没有允许适当的法律代表。

3.The defendant felt that the trial was nothing more than a kangaroo court, where the verdict was predetermined.

被告觉得这场审判不过是一个流氓法庭，判决结果是预先决定的。

4.Many believe that the celebrity was convicted in a kangaroo court due to media pressure and public opinion.

许多人认为这位名人在媒体压力和公众舆论下被定罪，实际上是在一个流氓法庭上受审。

5.In some countries, political dissidents are often tried in kangaroo courts to silence their voices.

在一些国家，政治异议人士常常在流氓法庭上受审，以压制他们的声音。

作文

In recent years, the term kangaroo court has gained traction in discussions surrounding justice and fairness. A kangaroo court refers to a judicial proceeding that is conducted in a way that lacks proper legal standards and fairness. It often involves a predetermined outcome, where the rights of the accused are disregarded, and the process is more about spectacle than actual justice. This concept can be observed in various contexts, from political trials to informal gatherings where decisions are made without due process.The origins of the term kangaroo court are somewhat unclear, but it is believed to have emerged in the United States during the Gold Rush era in the mid-19th century. During this time, miners would often set up makeshift courts to settle disputes quickly, sometimes leading to unjust verdicts. The imagery of a kangaroo, known for its unusual hopping movement, symbolizes the erratic and unpredictable nature of these courts.One of the most significant implications of a kangaroo court is the erosion of trust in the judicial system. When individuals perceive that justice is not being served fairly, they may lose faith in the legal framework that is supposed to protect their rights. This can lead to a cycle of disillusionment, where people resort to extrajudicial means to seek justice or revenge, further destabilizing society.Moreover, kangaroo courts are often used as tools for political oppression. Authoritarian regimes may establish such courts to silence dissent and eliminate opposition. By conducting trials that lack transparency and fairness, they can manipulate public perception and maintain control over the narrative. This is particularly troubling because it undermines the very principles of democracy and human rights that many societies strive to uphold.In contrast, a fair judicial system is built on the foundation of due process, where every individual is entitled to a fair trial, legal representation, and an impartial judge. The rule of law is paramount in ensuring that justice is served and that the rights of all parties are respected. In a functioning democracy, the judiciary acts as a check on power, holding authorities accountable for their actions.To combat the prevalence of kangaroo courts, it is essential to promote legal literacy among citizens. Understanding one’s rights and the workings of the judicial system can empower individuals to stand up against injustices. Additionally, advocating for reforms that enhance transparency and accountability within the legal framework is crucial. This includes ensuring that judges are independent and that legal proceedings are open to public scrutiny.In conclusion, the notion of a kangaroo court serves as a reminder of the importance of fairness and integrity within the judicial system. As we strive for a just society, it is imperative to recognize and address the factors that contribute to the existence of such courts. By doing so, we can work towards a legal system that truly embodies the principles of justice, equality, and respect for human rights. Only then can we ensure that the ideals of democracy are upheld and that every individual receives the fair treatment they deserve.

近年来，术语kangaroo court在关于正义和公平的讨论中越来越受到关注。kangaroo court指的是以缺乏适当法律标准和公平性的方式进行的司法程序。它通常涉及一个预先确定的结果，在这个过程中，被告的权利被忽视，程序更像是一种表演而非真正的正义。这一概念可以在各种背景下观察到，从政治审判到非正式聚会，在这些场合中，决策是在没有正当程序的情况下做出的。kangaroo court这一术语的起源尚不清楚，但据信它是在19世纪中叶美国的淘金热时期出现的。在这段时间里，矿工们经常设立临时法庭来迅速解决争端，有时导致不公正的判决。袋鼠的形象，以其不寻常的跳跃运动而闻名，象征着这些法庭的无序和不可预测的性质。kangaroo court的一个重要影响是对司法系统信任的侵蚀。当个人认为正义没有得到公平的维护时，他们可能会失去对本应保护其权利的法律框架的信心。这可能导致一种失望的循环，人们诉诸于法外手段来寻求正义或复仇，进一步破坏社会的稳定。此外，kangaroo courts通常被用作政治压迫的工具。专制政权可能建立这样的法庭来压制异议和消除反对派。通过进行缺乏透明度和公平性的审判，他们可以操纵公众认知并维持对叙事的控制。这尤其令人担忧，因为它破坏了许多社会努力维护的民主和人权的基本原则。相反，公平的司法系统建立在正当程序的基础上，每个人都有权享有公正的审判、法律代表和公正的法官。法治在确保正义得以实现并尊重所有当事人权利方面至关重要。在一个运作良好的民主国家，司法机构作为权力的制衡，追究当局对其行为的责任。为了打击kangaroo courts的普遍存在，促进公民的法律素养至关重要。了解自己的权利和司法系统的运作可以使个人能够站出来反对不公。此外，倡导增强法律框架内透明度和问责制的改革也至关重要。这包括确保法官独立，以及法律程序向公众开放。总之，kangaroo court的概念提醒我们司法系统中公平和诚信的重要性。在我们追求一个公正的社会时，必须认识到并解决导致此类法庭存在的因素。通过这样做，我们可以朝着一个真正体现正义、平等和尊重人权原则的法律系统努力。只有这样，我们才能确保民主理想得以维护，每个人都能获得应有的公正待遇。