asset stripping

简明释义

收购企业并出售资产

英英释义

例句

1.Many employees feared for their jobs due to the potential asset stripping 资产剥离 plans of the new owner.

由于新业主可能进行的资产剥离计划，许多员工对他们的工作感到担忧。

2.The company's recent acquisition raised concerns about possible asset stripping 资产剥离 of its valuable resources.

该公司的近期收购引发了对其宝贵资源可能被进行资产剥离的担忧。

3.The board decided to implement stricter regulations to prevent asset stripping 资产剥离 by future management.

董事会决定实施更严格的规定，以防止未来管理层进行资产剥离。

4.The investigation revealed that the previous owners engaged in asset stripping 资产剥离 before selling the company.

调查显示，前任所有者在出售公司之前进行了资产剥离。

5.Investors were wary of the firm’s reputation for asset stripping 资产剥离 after its last takeover.

在上次收购后，投资者对该公司进行资产剥离的声誉感到警惕。

作文

Asset stripping is a term that refers to the process of selling off a company's assets, often with little regard for the long-term viability of the business itself. This practice can occur in various contexts, such as during mergers and acquisitions, or when a company is facing financial difficulties. The primary goal of asset stripping (资产剥离) is to maximize short-term profits by liquidating valuable resources rather than focusing on sustainable growth and development. In the world of finance, asset stripping (资产剥离) is often viewed as a controversial practice. While it can lead to immediate financial gains for investors or shareholders, it can also have detrimental effects on employees, communities, and the economy as a whole. For instance, when a company is stripped of its assets, it may be forced to downsize or shut down operations entirely, leading to job losses and economic decline in the area where it operates. One notable example of asset stripping (资产剥离) occurred during the 1980s when corporate raiders targeted struggling companies. These raiders would acquire firms, sell off their most valuable assets—such as real estate, patents, or equipment—and then leave the remaining shell of the company to fend for itself. This not only harmed the employees who lost their jobs but also destabilized entire industries and created uncertainty in the market. Critics argue that asset stripping (资产剥离) prioritizes short-term financial gains over long-term sustainability. They contend that businesses should focus on creating value for all stakeholders, including employees, customers, and the community. Sustainable business practices encourage investment in innovation, employee development, and corporate responsibility, which ultimately contribute to a healthier economy. On the other hand, proponents of asset stripping (资产剥离) argue that it can sometimes be a necessary strategy to rescue failing companies. By liquidating underperforming assets, a company can free up capital to invest in more profitable ventures or streamline operations. In some cases, this approach can lead to a turnaround that benefits all stakeholders in the long run. The debate surrounding asset stripping (资产剥离) raises important questions about the ethics of business practices and the responsibilities of corporate leaders. Should executives prioritize shareholder profits above all else, or should they consider the broader impact of their decisions? As the business landscape continues to evolve, it is essential for companies to strike a balance between generating profits and fostering sustainable growth. In conclusion, asset stripping (资产剥离) is a complex and multifaceted issue that reflects the tension between short-term profits and long-term sustainability. While it can provide immediate financial benefits, the potential negative consequences for employees, communities, and the economy cannot be overlooked. As we move forward, it is crucial for businesses to adopt responsible practices that prioritize the well-being of all stakeholders while still achieving financial success.