impose sanctions

简明释义

实行制裁

英英释义

例句

1.The United Nations decided to impose sanctions on the country for its violation of human rights.

联合国决定对该国实施制裁，因为它违反了人权。

2.Many countries are considering whether to impose sanctions on the regime after the recent elections.

在最近的选举后，许多国家正在考虑是否对该政权实施制裁。

3.The European Union plans to impose sanctions targeting key industries in the offending nation.

欧盟计划对该国的关键产业实施制裁。

4.In response to the cyber attacks, the government announced it would impose sanctions against the perpetrators.

作为对网络攻击的回应，政府宣布将对肇事者实施制裁。

5.If the negotiations fail, the international community may impose sanctions to pressure the government.

如果谈判失败，国际社会可能会实施制裁以施压政府。

作文

In recent years, the use of economic measures has become a common tool for countries to address international conflicts and human rights violations. One of the most frequently used methods is to impose sanctions, which refers to the act of restricting trade or other economic activities with a particular country to influence its behavior. The primary goal of these sanctions is to compel the targeted nation to change its policies or actions that are deemed unacceptable by the international community. For instance, when a government engages in aggressive military actions or violates fundamental human rights, other nations may choose to impose sanctions as a form of protest and to pressure the offending regime to alter its behavior.The effectiveness of imposing sanctions can vary significantly based on several factors. Firstly, the level of commitment from the international community plays a crucial role. Sanctions are more likely to be successful if they are implemented collectively by multiple nations rather than unilateral actions taken by a single country. For example, the United Nations often coordinates sanctions against nations that violate international laws, ensuring that the pressure is felt more acutely by the targeted state. Moreover, the economic impact of imposing sanctions must be substantial enough to force the government in question to reconsider its policies. If the targeted country has alternative trading partners or sufficient resources to withstand the economic blow, the sanctions may not achieve their intended effect.Another important aspect to consider is the humanitarian implications of imposing sanctions. While the objective is to target the government or specific sectors of the economy, the repercussions often extend to the civilian population. For instance, sanctions can lead to shortages of essential goods, such as food and medicine, which disproportionately affect ordinary citizens rather than the political elite. Consequently, many argue that while imposing sanctions may serve as a necessary tool for international diplomacy, it is crucial to balance these actions with considerations for human welfare. This has led to discussions about implementing 'smart sanctions' that specifically target individuals or entities responsible for objectionable actions while minimizing harm to the general population.Furthermore, the long-term consequences of imposing sanctions can also be problematic. In some cases, sanctions may entrench a regime's power by fostering a sense of nationalism among the populace, who might view foreign interference as a threat. This can lead to a rallying-around-the-flag effect, where citizens support their government even more staunchly in the face of external pressure. Thus, while imposing sanctions can be an effective short-term strategy, it may not always lead to the desired outcomes in the long run.In conclusion, the act of imposing sanctions is a complex and multifaceted issue that requires careful consideration of its potential impacts. While it can serve as a powerful tool for influencing international behavior, the effectiveness, humanitarian implications, and long-term consequences must all be taken into account. Moving forward, the international community must strive to find a balance between holding governments accountable for their actions and ensuring that the basic needs of civilians are met. Only through thoughtful and coordinated efforts can we hope to use sanctions effectively to foster a more just and peaceful world.

近年来，经济制裁已成为各国应对国际冲突和人权侵犯的常用工具。其中最常用的方法之一是实施制裁，指的是限制与特定国家的贸易或其他经济活动，以影响其行为。这些制裁的主要目标是迫使被制裁国家改变国际社会认为不可接受的政策或行为。例如，当一个政府采取侵略性军事行动或侵犯基本人权时，其他国家可能选择实施制裁作为抗议形式，并施加压力以促使违规政权改变其行为。实施制裁的有效性可能会因多个因素而显著不同。首先，国际社会的承诺程度在其中起着至关重要的作用。如果多个国家共同实施制裁，而不是单一国家采取单边行动，则制裁更有可能成功。例如，联合国经常协调针对违反国际法的国家的制裁，确保目标国家感受到更大的压力。此外，实施制裁的经济影响必须足够重大，以迫使相关政府重新考虑其政策。如果被制裁国家有其他贸易伙伴或有足够的资源来抵御经济打击，制裁可能无法达到预期效果。另一个需要考虑的重要方面是实施制裁的 гуманитарные последствия。虽然目标是针对政府或特定经济部门，但后果往往会扩展到平民人口。例如，制裁可能导致基本商品（如食品和药品）短缺，这对普通公民的影响远大于政治精英。因此，许多人认为，尽管实施制裁可能是国际外交所需的工具，但在采取这些行动时必须考虑人道主义问题。这导致了关于实施“智能制裁”的讨论，专门针对负责可恶行为的个人或实体，同时最大限度地减少对普通民众的伤害。此外，实施制裁的长期后果也可能存在问题。在某些情况下，制裁可能通过在民众中培养民族主义情绪来巩固政权，因为民众可能将外国干涉视为威胁。这可能导致一种团结效应，公民在外部压力面前更加坚定地支持他们的政府。因此，尽管实施制裁可以作为一种有效的短期策略，但它并不总能在长期内实现预期结果。总之，实施制裁是一项复杂且多面的议题，需要仔细考虑其潜在影响。虽然它可以作为影响国际行为的强大工具，但必须考虑其有效性、人道主义影响和长期后果。展望未来，国际社会必须努力在追究政府责任和确保满足平民基本需求之间找到平衡。只有通过深思熟虑和协调一致的努力，我们才能希望有效地利用制裁，促进一个更加公正和和平的世界。