interrogating
简明释义
英[ɪnˈtɛrəɡeɪtɪŋ]美[ɪnˈtɛrəˌɡeɪtɪŋ]
v. [计]询问(interrogate 的 ing 形式);质问
英英释义
单词用法
审问嫌疑人 | |
审问证人 | |
询问数据 | |
询问一个系统 | |
审问技巧 | |
审问方法 | |
质疑权威 | |
审问证据 |
同义词
反义词
回应 | 她正在认真地回应这些问题。 | ||
回答 | 他在回答审问者的问题。 | ||
释放 | 审问后,他们将释放嫌疑人。 |
例句
1.My friend fell in fears while he finding that police are interrogating lodgers who are on spot.
当得知警察盘问过在场房客的时候,我的朋友非常害怕。
2.The library figures out how to further interact with the server by interrogating the server responses.
这个库通过询问服务器响应来确定如何进一步与服务器交互。
3.The GM8037 high resolution fiber grating sensor interrogating system is a PC-based, compact sized, high accurate, big dynamic range FBG sensors interrogating system.
GM8037高分辨率光纤光栅传感器解调仪是一个PC机控制的、大功率,高精度、大动态范围的光纤布拉格光栅传感器解调系统及高精度的光谱分析系统。
4.Interrogating Hong Niang is a typical civil play, while this Crossroads belongs to military play.
《拷红》是典型的文戏,而《三岔口》属于武戏。
5.Interrogating the validity of a theory, in fact, is questioning the reasons and foundations, on which a theory rests.
追问一种理论的合法性,就是在追问该理论存在的理由和根据。
6.Although they would act angry when making interrogating, I'm not afraid of anything, of course there was no way I was going to lose.
虽然他们会假装生气来质问我,我又初生牛犊不畏虎,我当然不会输啦。
7.Provide the management procedure related to the interrogating and examining of greenhouse gas.
温室气体盘查相关的管理程序书。
8.The lawyer was interrogating the witness to strengthen her case.
律师正在对证人进行质询以增强她的案件。
9.In the movie, the hero was interrogating a villain to uncover the truth.
在电影中,英雄正在对反派进行审问以揭露真相。
10.The detective was interrogating the suspect for hours.
侦探对嫌疑人进行了几个小时的审问。
11.The teacher started interrogating the students to ensure they understood the material.
老师开始对学生们进行提问,以确保他们理解材料。
12.During the meeting, he kept interrogating the presenter about the project details.
在会议上,他不断地对演讲者进行询问项目细节。
作文
In the realm of law enforcement and criminal justice, the process of interrogating suspects plays a crucial role in uncovering the truth behind a crime. Interrogating is not just about asking questions; it is an art that requires skill, patience, and psychological insight. The effectiveness of an interrogation can often determine the outcome of a case, making it a vital component of investigative procedures.To begin with, the primary goal of interrogating is to gather information. Investigators must create an environment where the suspect feels comfortable enough to share details about the incident. This requires building rapport and trust. A skilled interrogator knows that people are more likely to open up when they do not feel threatened or cornered. Thus, the initial approach during an interrogation is critical. It can involve casual conversation to ease the tension before delving into more serious inquiries.Moreover, interrogating involves understanding human psychology. Different individuals react differently under pressure. Some may become defensive, while others might become overly compliant. Recognizing these behavioral cues can help the interrogator adjust their strategy accordingly. For instance, if a suspect appears anxious, the interrogator might choose to adopt a softer tone and ask open-ended questions to encourage dialogue. Conversely, if a suspect seems overly confident, a more direct approach might be necessary to challenge their narrative.Another important aspect of interrogating is the ethical considerations involved. While the aim is to obtain truthful information, it is imperative that the methods employed do not violate the rights of the suspect. Coercive techniques or intimidation tactics can lead to false confessions and undermine the integrity of the justice system. Therefore, establishing a balance between effective questioning and ethical treatment is essential for any interrogator.Furthermore, the use of technology has transformed the landscape of interrogating. With the advent of video recording, interrogators can now document the entire process, which serves as both a tool for analysis and a safeguard against misconduct. Recorded sessions can be reviewed to evaluate the effectiveness of different techniques and ensure that the rights of the suspect are upheld throughout the process.In conclusion, interrogating is a complex and nuanced procedure that requires a blend of interpersonal skills, psychological insight, and ethical responsibility. It is not merely about extracting information but rather about fostering an atmosphere conducive to truthfulness. By understanding the dynamics of human behavior and employing effective communication strategies, law enforcement officers can enhance their ability to solve crimes and achieve justice. The art of interrogating continues to evolve, reflecting the ongoing advancements in our understanding of human psychology and the importance of ethical practices in the pursuit of truth.
在执法和刑事司法领域,审讯嫌疑人的过程在揭示犯罪背后的真相中发挥着至关重要的作用。审讯不仅仅是问问题;这是一门需要技巧、耐心和心理洞察力的艺术。审讯的有效性往往决定了案件的结果,使其成为调查程序中一个至关重要的组成部分。首先,审讯的主要目标是收集信息。调查人员必须创造一个让嫌疑人感到足够舒适的环境,以便分享事件的细节。这需要建立融洽和信任。一个熟练的审讯者知道,当人们不感到受到威胁或被逼迫时,更有可能敞开心扉。因此,审讯中的初步接触至关重要。这可能涉及轻松的对话,以缓解紧张,然后再深入更严肃的询问。此外,审讯还涉及理解人类心理学。不同的人在压力下会有不同的反应。有些人可能会变得防御,而另一些人可能会过于顺从。识别这些行为线索可以帮助审讯者相应地调整策略。例如,如果嫌疑人显得焦虑,审讯者可能会选择采取更温和的语气,并提出开放式问题以鼓励对话。相反,如果嫌疑人看起来过于自信,可能需要采取更直接的方法来挑战他们的叙述。另一个重要的方面是审讯中涉及的伦理考虑。虽然目标是获得真实的信息,但所采用的方法绝不能侵犯嫌疑人的权利。强迫性技术或恐吓策略可能导致虚假供述,破坏司法系统的完整性。因此,在有效提问和道德对待之间建立平衡,对于任何审讯者来说都是至关重要的。此外,科技的使用改变了审讯的格局。随着视频录制技术的出现,审讯者现在可以记录整个过程,这既是分析的工具,也是防止不当行为的保障。记录的会议可以被回顾,以评估不同技术的有效性,并确保在整个过程中维护嫌疑人的权利。总之,审讯是一种复杂而微妙的程序,需要人际交往技能、心理洞察力和伦理责任的结合。这不仅仅是关于提取信息,而是关于营造一个有利于真实的氛围。通过理解人类行为的动态并采用有效的沟通策略,执法人员可以增强他们解决犯罪和实现正义的能力。审讯的艺术继续发展,反映出我们对人类心理学理解的不断进步以及在追求真相过程中伦理实践的重要性。