across-the-board tax cut

简明释义

普遍减税

英英释义

例句

1.The president's proposal for an across-the-board tax cut aims to increase consumer spending.

总统提出的全面的减税政策旨在增加消费者支出。

2.An across-the-board tax cut can benefit all income groups equally.

一项全面的减税政策可以平等地惠及所有收入群体。

3.During the election, candidates debated the merits of an across-the-board tax cut.

在选举期间，候选人们辩论了全面的减税政策的优缺点。

4.Many citizens welcomed the across-the-board tax cut as a relief from high taxes.

许多公民欢迎这项全面的减税政策，认为这是对高税收的缓解。

5.The government announced an across-the-board tax cut to stimulate economic growth.

政府宣布了一项全面的减税政策以刺激经济增长。

作文

In recent years, the concept of an across-the-board tax cut has gained significant attention in political and economic discussions. An across-the-board tax cut refers to a policy that reduces tax rates for all taxpayers, regardless of their income level or tax bracket. This type of tax reduction is often proposed as a means to stimulate economic growth, increase disposable income, and promote consumer spending. However, the implications of such a policy can be complex and multifaceted.One of the primary arguments in favor of an across-the-board tax cut is that it can provide immediate financial relief to individuals and families. By lowering tax rates for everyone, people have more money in their pockets, which they can use to pay bills, save for the future, or spend on goods and services. This increased consumer spending can, in turn, help boost the economy by driving demand for products and services, leading to higher production levels and job creation.Moreover, proponents argue that an across-the-board tax cut can simplify the tax code, making it easier for taxpayers to understand their obligations and for the government to administer the tax system. A simpler tax structure can reduce compliance costs and make it less burdensome for individuals and businesses to file their taxes.However, critics of an across-the-board tax cut raise concerns about its potential impact on government revenue and social equity. Reducing tax rates across the board may lead to significant decreases in government revenue, which could affect funding for essential public services such as education, healthcare, and infrastructure. Critics argue that these services are vital for the well-being of society and that tax cuts should be targeted towards those who need them most, rather than applied uniformly.Additionally, there is a debate about the fairness of an across-the-board tax cut. While it may seem equitable to reduce taxes for everyone, wealthier individuals often benefit more from such cuts in absolute terms. For example, a tax reduction of 10% will result in a larger dollar amount saved for someone in a higher tax bracket compared to someone in a lower bracket. This raises questions about whether an across-the-board tax cut truly addresses income inequality or merely perpetuates it.Furthermore, the effectiveness of an across-the-board tax cut in stimulating economic growth is also debated among economists. Some studies suggest that while tax cuts can provide short-term boosts to the economy, they may not lead to sustainable long-term growth. Critics argue that other factors, such as investment in infrastructure, education, and technology, are more critical for fostering economic development.In conclusion, the idea of an across-the-board tax cut presents both opportunities and challenges. While it can offer immediate financial relief and simplify the tax system, it also raises important questions about government revenue, social equity, and long-term economic growth. Policymakers must carefully consider these factors when discussing tax policy changes, ensuring that any tax cuts implemented serve the best interests of the economy and society as a whole. Ultimately, the effectiveness of an across-the-board tax cut depends on the broader context of fiscal policy and the specific needs of the population it aims to serve.

近年来，‘全面减税’这一概念在政治和经济讨论中引起了显著关注。‘全面减税’指的是一种政策，它降低所有纳税人的税率，无论其收入水平或税级如何。这种类型的税收减少通常被提议作为刺激经济增长、增加可支配收入和促进消费支出的手段。然而，这种政策的影响可能是复杂而多面的。支持‘全面减税’的主要论点之一是，它可以为个人和家庭提供即时的财政救助。通过降低所有人的税率，人们口袋里有更多的钱，可以用来支付账单、储蓄或消费商品和服务。这种消费者支出的增加反过来又可以通过推动对产品和服务的需求来帮助刺激经济，从而导致更高的生产水平和就业创造。此外，倡导者还认为，‘全面减税’可以简化税制，使纳税人更容易理解自己的义务，政府也更容易管理税收系统。更简单的税制可以减少合规成本，使个人和企业报税的负担减轻。然而，‘全面减税’的批评者则对其可能对政府收入和社会公平的影响表示担忧。普遍降低税率可能会导致政府收入显著减少，这可能会影响教育、医疗和基础设施等重要公共服务的资金。批评者认为，这些服务对社会的福祉至关重要，因此税收减免应针对最需要它们的人，而不是普遍适用。此外，关于‘全面减税’的公平性也存在争论。虽然对每个人减税似乎是公平的，但富裕个人往往在绝对金额上受益更多。例如，10%的税收减少对于高税级的人来说，节省的金额将大于低税级的人。这引发了关于‘全面减税’是否真正解决收入不平等的问题，还是仅仅延续了这种不平等。此外，经济学家们也在辩论‘全面减税’在刺激经济增长方面的有效性。一些研究表明，尽管减税可以在短期内对经济产生推动作用，但可能不会导致可持续的长期增长。批评者认为，基础设施、教育和技术的投资等其他因素对促进经济发展更为关键。总之，‘全面减税’的理念既带来了机遇，也面临挑战。虽然它可以提供即时的财政救助并简化税制，但它也提出了关于政府收入、社会公平和长期经济增长的重要问题。政策制定者在讨论税收政策变更时必须仔细考虑这些因素，确保实施的任何减税措施符合经济和社会整体利益。最终，‘全面减税’的有效性取决于财政政策的更广泛背景以及其旨在服务的特定人群的需求。