evaluation criterion

简明释义

评价标准

英英释义

例句

1.We established an evaluation criterion 评估标准 to assess the effectiveness of our marketing strategies.

我们建立了一个评估标准 evaluation criterion来评估我们的营销策略的有效性。

2.Customer satisfaction is a key evaluation criterion 评估标准 for our product development.

客户满意度是我们产品开发的一个关键评估标准 evaluation criterion。

3.The main evaluation criterion 评估标准 for this project is its cost-effectiveness.

这个项目的主要评估标准 evaluation criterion是其成本效益。

4.In the hiring process, the evaluation criterion 评估标准 includes experience, skills, and cultural fit.

在招聘过程中，评估标准 evaluation criterion包括经验、技能和文化适应性。

5.The evaluation criterion 评估标准 for selecting vendors was based on their reliability and service quality.

选择供应商的评估标准 evaluation criterion是基于他们的可靠性和服务质量。

作文

In the realm of education, the concept of an evaluation criterion (评估标准) is pivotal for both educators and students. It serves as a guideline that outlines the parameters by which students' performance is assessed. A well-defined evaluation criterion (评估标准) not only clarifies expectations but also provides a structured framework for evaluating various aspects of student work. To illustrate, consider a research paper assigned in a university course. The professor might establish a set of evaluation criteria (评估标准) that includes clarity of argument, depth of research, originality, and adherence to formatting guidelines. Each of these components plays a crucial role in determining the overall quality of the paper. By specifying these evaluation criteria (评估标准), the professor ensures that students understand what is required for success. Moreover, the use of evaluation criteria (评估标准) fosters transparency in the grading process. Students are more likely to feel confident about their assessments when they know exactly how their work will be judged. This transparency can reduce anxiety and encourage students to engage more deeply with the material. When students are aware of the evaluation criteria (评估标准), they can focus their efforts on meeting these standards, thereby improving their learning outcomes. In addition to promoting fairness, evaluation criteria (评估标准) can also facilitate constructive feedback. When instructors use clear evaluation criteria (评估标准) to evaluate assignments, they can provide specific comments that align with those standards. For example, if a student receives feedback indicating that their argument lacked clarity, they can refer back to the established evaluation criteria (评估标准) to understand where they fell short. This targeted feedback helps students identify areas for improvement and develop their skills over time. Furthermore, evaluation criteria (评估标准) can vary depending on the context and goals of the assignment. In creative fields such as art or music, the evaluation criteria (评估标准) might focus more on creativity and expression rather than strict adherence to technical rules. In contrast, in a science experiment, the evaluation criteria (评估标准) might prioritize accuracy and methodology. Recognizing that different disciplines have unique evaluation criteria (评估标准) allows educators to tailor their assessments to better fit the objectives of each subject area. In conclusion, the establishment of clear and effective evaluation criteria (评估标准) is essential in educational settings. These criteria not only guide students in their learning journey but also enhance the overall assessment process for educators. By promoting transparency, facilitating feedback, and accommodating the diverse needs of various disciplines, evaluation criteria (评估标准) play a crucial role in fostering an environment of growth and improvement. As both educators and students navigate the complexities of learning, the importance of well-defined evaluation criteria (评估标准) cannot be overstated.

在教育领域，评估标准（evaluation criterion）的概念对教育工作者和学生来说至关重要。它作为一个指导方针，概述了评估学生表现的参数。明确定义的评估标准（evaluation criterion）不仅阐明了期望，还提供了一个结构化的框架，用于评估学生作品的各个方面。例如，考虑一篇在大学课程中分配的研究论文。教授可能会建立一套评估标准（evaluation criterion），包括论点的清晰度、研究的深度、原创性和格式要求的遵循。这些组成部分在决定论文整体质量方面发挥着至关重要的作用。通过明确这些评估标准（evaluation criterion），教授确保学生理解成功所需的条件。此外，使用评估标准（evaluation criterion）有助于提高评分过程的透明度。当学生确切知道他们的作品将如何被评判时，他们更有可能对自己的评估感到自信。这种透明度可以减少焦虑，并鼓励学生更深入地参与学习材料。当学生意识到评估标准（evaluation criterion）时，他们可以将精力集中在满足这些标准上，从而改善他们的学习成果。除了促进公平外，评估标准（evaluation criterion）还可以促进建设性的反馈。当教师使用明确的评估标准（evaluation criterion）来评估作业时，他们可以提供与这些标准一致的具体评论。例如，如果学生收到的反馈表明他们的论点缺乏清晰度，他们可以参考已建立的评估标准（evaluation criterion）来理解自己哪里做得不够。这种针对性的反馈帮助学生识别改进的领域，并随着时间的推移发展他们的技能。此外，评估标准（evaluation criterion）可能会根据作业的背景和目标而有所不同。在艺术或音乐等创意领域，评估标准（evaluation criterion）可能更关注创造力和表现，而不是严格遵循技术规则。相反，在科学实验中，评估标准（evaluation criterion）可能优先考虑准确性和方法论。认识到不同学科具有独特的评估标准（evaluation criterion）使教育者能够量身定制他们的评估，以更好地适应每个学科领域的目标。总之，建立明确有效的评估标准（evaluation criterion）在教育环境中至关重要。这些标准不仅指导学生的学习旅程，还增强了教育者的整体评估过程。通过促进透明度、促进反馈和适应各个学科的多样化需求，评估标准（evaluation criterion）在培养成长和改进的环境中发挥着关键作用。当教育者和学生共同应对学习的复杂性时，明确的评估标准（evaluation criterion）的重要性不容忽视。