state monopoly for purchase of farm produce

简明释义

农产品统购

英英释义

例句

1.The state monopoly for purchase of farm produce was established to protect small farmers from exploitation by large corporations.

建立农产品采购国家垄断是为了保护小农户免受大公司的剥削。

2.The government has implemented a state monopoly for purchase of farm produce to stabilize market prices.

政府实施了农产品采购国家垄断以稳定市场价格。

3.Under the state monopoly for purchase of farm produce, all agricultural products must be sold to the government.

在农产品采购国家垄断下，所有农产品必须销售给政府。

4.Critics argue that the state monopoly for purchase of farm produce limits farmers' freedom to negotiate better deals.

批评者认为，农产品采购国家垄断限制了农民谈判更好交易的自由。

5.Farmers are required to sell their crops through the state monopoly for purchase of farm produce to ensure fair pricing.

农民必须通过农产品采购国家垄断出售他们的作物，以确保公平定价。

作文

The concept of state monopoly for purchase of farm produce is a significant aspect of agricultural economics and government policy. In many countries, the government plays a crucial role in regulating the agricultural sector to ensure food security and fair prices for both farmers and consumers. A state monopoly for purchase of farm produce refers to a situation where the government is the sole buyer of agricultural products from farmers. This system can have both advantages and disadvantages, which are essential to explore in understanding its implications for the agricultural economy.One of the primary advantages of a state monopoly for purchase of farm produce is that it provides farmers with a guaranteed market for their products. This stability can be particularly beneficial in developing countries where farmers may otherwise struggle to find buyers for their crops. By purchasing directly from farmers, the government can ensure that they receive a fair price, which helps to support their livelihoods. Additionally, this system can help to stabilize market prices, preventing drastic fluctuations that can occur in a free market.Moreover, a state monopoly for purchase of farm produce can facilitate better planning and distribution of agricultural products. The government can implement policies that prioritize food security and allocate resources effectively. For instance, during times of crisis, such as natural disasters or pandemics, the government can ensure that food supplies are distributed equitably among the population. This centralized approach can help to prevent food shortages and maintain social stability.However, there are also significant drawbacks to a state monopoly for purchase of farm produce. One major concern is that it can lead to inefficiencies in the agricultural sector. When the government is the only buyer, there is often less incentive for farmers to innovate or improve their production methods. This lack of competition can result in stagnation, where agricultural practices do not evolve to meet changing market demands. Furthermore, bureaucratic processes may slow down the purchasing and payment systems, leaving farmers waiting for their earnings.Another issue is that a state monopoly for purchase of farm produce can create a disconnect between farmers and consumers. When the government controls the purchasing process, it may not accurately reflect consumer preferences or demand. This misalignment can lead to overproduction of certain crops while others are neglected, ultimately resulting in waste and inefficiency. Farmers may feel alienated from the market, as they have little control over what they grow or how much they are paid.In conclusion, the state monopoly for purchase of farm produce is a complex system that carries both benefits and challenges. While it can provide stability and security for farmers, it can also hinder innovation and disconnect producers from consumers. As governments continue to navigate the intricacies of agricultural policy, it is essential to strike a balance that supports farmers while encouraging competition and responsiveness to market needs. Understanding the implications of a state monopoly for purchase of farm produce is crucial for policymakers aiming to create a sustainable and efficient agricultural sector that benefits all stakeholders involved.

“国家对农产品采购的垄断”这一概念是农业经济学和政府政策的重要方面。在许多国家，政府在调节农业部门以确保粮食安全和农民与消费者之间公平价格方面发挥着至关重要的作用。“国家对农产品采购的垄断”指的是政府成为农民农产品唯一买家的情况。这种制度具有优缺点，这对于理解其对农业经济的影响至关重要。“国家对农产品采购的垄断”的主要优点之一是为农民提供了一个有保障的市场。这种稳定性对于那些可能会面临找不到买家的困境的发展中国家的农民特别有益。通过直接向农民采购，政府可以确保他们获得公平的价格，从而支持他们的生计。此外，这种制度有助于稳定市场价格，防止自由市场中可能出现的剧烈波动。此外，“国家对农产品采购的垄断”可以促进农业产品的更好规划和分配。政府可以实施优先考虑粮食安全的政策，并有效分配资源。例如，在自然灾害或疫情等危机时期，政府可以确保食品供应在各个群体之间公平分配。这种集中化的方法可以帮助防止食品短缺，维护社会稳定。然而，“国家对农产品采购的垄断”也存在显著的缺点。一个主要的问题是，它可能导致农业部门的低效。当政府是唯一的买家时，农民往往缺乏创新或改善生产方法的动力。这种缺乏竞争的情况可能导致农业实践停滞不前，无法跟上市场需求的变化。此外，官僚程序可能会减缓采购和付款系统，使农民等待他们的收入。另一个问题是，“国家对农产品采购的垄断”可能导致农民与消费者之间的脱节。当政府控制采购过程时，可能无法准确反映消费者的偏好或需求。这种不匹配可能导致某些作物的过度生产，而其他作物则被忽视，最终导致浪费和低效率。农民可能会感到与市场脱节，因为他们对自己种植的作物或获得的价格几乎没有控制权。总之，“国家对农产品采购的垄断”是一个复杂的系统，既有好处也有挑战。虽然它可以为农民提供稳定和安全，但也可能阻碍创新并使生产者与消费者脱节。随着各国政府继续应对农业政策的复杂性，必须在支持农民的同时鼓励竞争和对市场需求的响应之间找到平衡。理解“国家对农产品采购的垄断”的影响对于旨在创建可持续和高效的农业部门的决策者至关重要，以使所有利益相关者受益。