detention charge

简明释义

留滞费

英英释义

例句

1.The shipping company informed us that we would incur a detention charge for keeping the container beyond the allowed time.

运输公司通知我们，由于超出允许时间，我们将产生滞留费用。

2.He was unaware that keeping the equipment for an extra week would result in a detention charge.

他不知道多保留设备一周会导致产生滞留费用。

3.The airline warned passengers about a potential detention charge if their luggage was not picked up promptly.

航空公司警告乘客，如果行李未能及时领取，可能会收取滞留费用。

4.Due to the delay in customs clearance, we faced a significant detention charge for our cargo.

由于海关清关延迟，我们的货物面临了巨额的滞留费用。

5.After failing to return the rental car on time, I was surprised by the detention charge added to my bill.

在未按时归还租车后，我对账单上增加的滞留费用感到惊讶。

作文

In recent years, the topic of juvenile justice has gained significant attention in many societies. One particular aspect that has sparked debate is the implementation of a detention charge, which refers to the fees imposed on individuals who are held in detention facilities, often for minor offenses. This practice raises various questions about fairness, accessibility, and the overall impact on young offenders. The concept of a detention charge is rooted in the belief that those who utilize public services should contribute to their costs. However, when it comes to juvenile detention, the implications of such charges can be profound. Many families may struggle to pay these fees, leading to added financial burdens during an already challenging time. This situation can create a cycle of poverty and crime, as families may face additional stress and instability due to these unexpected expenses.Moreover, the existence of a detention charge can disproportionately affect marginalized communities. Families from lower socioeconomic backgrounds are often the ones most impacted by such policies. When a child is detained, the financial strain can lead to further complications, such as inability to secure legal representation or access necessary support services. This can ultimately hinder the rehabilitation process and increase the likelihood of reoffending.Critics argue that imposing a detention charge undermines the very purpose of juvenile justice, which is to rehabilitate rather than punish. The juvenile justice system is designed to provide guidance and support to young individuals, helping them to make better choices in the future. By introducing financial penalties, the system risks prioritizing monetary gain over the well-being of youth. This approach can send a message that justice is contingent upon one’s ability to pay, which contradicts the fundamental principles of equity and fairness.Additionally, the psychological impact of a detention charge on young offenders cannot be overlooked. Being detained is already a traumatic experience, and adding financial burdens can exacerbate feelings of shame and hopelessness. Young people may feel that they are being punished not just for their actions but also for their family’s financial situation. This can lead to a sense of alienation from the community and a decreased likelihood of successful reintegration into society.In light of these concerns, some jurisdictions are reevaluating the use of detention charges. Advocates for reform argue that resources should be directed towards support systems that aid in rehabilitation rather than penalizing families financially. Programs that focus on restorative justice, community service, and counseling have shown promise in reducing recidivism rates among young offenders. Ultimately, the conversation surrounding detention charges highlights the need for a more compassionate and equitable approach to juvenile justice. It is essential to consider the broader implications of these policies and strive for solutions that prioritize the well-being of young individuals and their families. By doing so, society can work towards creating a system that truly supports rehabilitation and reduces the likelihood of future offenses, ensuring a brighter future for all youth, regardless of their background.

近年来，青少年司法问题在许多社会中引起了广泛关注。一个特别引发争论的方面是对实施拘留费用的讨论，这指的是对因轻微犯罪而被拘留的个人收取的费用。这一做法引发了关于公平性、可及性以及对年轻罪犯整体影响的各种问题。拘留费用的概念源于这样一种信念：使用公共服务的人应为其费用做出贡献。然而，当涉及到青少年拘留时，这种费用的存在可能会产生深远的影响。许多家庭可能难以支付这些费用，从而在已经面临挑战的时期增加了额外的经济负担。这种情况可能会导致贫困和犯罪的循环，因为家庭可能由于这些意外支出而面临更多的压力和不稳定。此外，拘留费用的存在可能会对边缘化社区产生不成比例的影响。来自低社会经济背景的家庭往往是这些政策最受影响的群体。当孩子被拘留时，财务压力可能会导致进一步的复杂情况，例如无法获得法律代理或访问必要的支持服务。这最终可能阻碍康复过程，并增加再次犯罪的可能性。批评者认为，征收拘留费用削弱了青少年司法的根本目的，即康复而非惩罚。青少年司法系统旨在为年轻个体提供指导和支持，帮助他们在未来做出更好的选择。通过引入经济处罚，系统有风险地优先考虑金钱利益而非青少年的福祉。这种做法可能传达出一个信息，即正义取决于一个人的支付能力，这与公平和平等的基本原则相悖。此外，拘留费用对年轻罪犯的心理影响也不容忽视。被拘留本身就是一种创伤经历，增加经济负担可能会加剧羞耻感和绝望感。年轻人可能会觉得他们不仅因自己的行为受到惩罚，还因家庭的经济状况而受罚。这可能导致他们与社区的疏离感，并降低成功重新融入社会的可能性。鉴于这些担忧，一些地区正在重新评估拘留费用的使用。改革倡导者认为，资源应该用于支持系统，以帮助康复，而不是在经济上惩罚家庭。专注于恢复性司法、社区服务和咨询的项目在减少年轻罪犯再犯率方面显示出了希望。最终，围绕拘留费用的讨论突显了需要对青少年司法采取更具同情心和公平的方法。考虑这些政策的更广泛影响并努力寻求优先考虑年轻个体及其家庭福祉的解决方案是至关重要的。通过这样做，社会可以朝着创建一个真正支持康复并减少未来犯罪可能性的系统迈进，确保所有青少年，无论其背景如何，都能拥有更光明的未来。