state monopoly purchasing price for grain

简明释义

粮食统购价格

英英释义

例句

1.Many farmers are concerned about how changes in the state monopoly purchasing price for grain 国家粮食的垄断收购价格 will affect their income.

许多农民担心国家粮食的垄断收购价格的变化将如何影响他们的收入。

2.The government aims to stabilize the economy by controlling the state monopoly purchasing price for grain 国家粮食的垄断收购价格.

政府旨在通过控制国家粮食的垄断收购价格来稳定经济。

3.The government announced a new policy to adjust the state monopoly purchasing price for grain 国家粮食的垄断收购价格 to support local farmers.

政府宣布了一项新政策，将调整国家粮食的垄断收购价格以支持当地农民。

4.The state monopoly purchasing price for grain 国家粮食的垄断收购价格 is set annually based on market conditions and production levels.

每年根据市场情况和生产水平设定国家粮食的垄断收购价格。

5.Farmers are encouraged to produce more due to the favorable state monopoly purchasing price for grain 国家粮食的垄断收购价格 this year.

由于今年有利的国家粮食的垄断收购价格，农民被鼓励多生产。

作文

The concept of state monopoly purchasing price for grain is a crucial aspect of agricultural economics and government policy in many countries. This term refers to the price set by the government for the purchase of grain from farmers, effectively creating a monopoly where the state is the sole buyer of grain. This system aims to stabilize the agricultural market and ensure that farmers receive a fair price for their produce. In this essay, I will explore the implications of the state monopoly purchasing price for grain on farmers, consumers, and the overall economy. Firstly, the state monopoly purchasing price for grain plays a significant role in protecting farmers' incomes. By establishing a fixed price for grain, the government can shield farmers from volatile market fluctuations that can occur due to supply and demand changes. For instance, during years of bumper harvests, grain prices may plummet as supply exceeds demand. However, with a state-set price, farmers can rely on a stable income, which encourages them to invest in better farming practices and technologies. This stability is particularly important in developing countries where agriculture is a primary source of livelihood for a large portion of the population.Moreover, the state monopoly purchasing price for grain can also have positive effects on food security. By ensuring that farmers are guaranteed a price for their grain, the government can encourage increased production. This, in turn, helps to maintain a steady supply of food in the market, reducing the risk of food shortages and price spikes that can harm consumers. Additionally, when farmers are assured of a fair price, they are more likely to produce enough grain to meet the needs of their communities, contributing to overall food security.However, there are also criticisms of the state monopoly purchasing price for grain. One major concern is that it can lead to inefficiencies in the market. When the government is the sole buyer, it may not respond to consumer preferences or changes in demand effectively. This can result in overproduction of certain grains while neglecting others that might be in higher demand. Furthermore, the monopoly can stifle competition, leading to complacency among producers who may not feel the pressure to innovate or improve their products.Additionally, the state monopoly purchasing price for grain can create a dependency on government support. Farmers may become reliant on the guaranteed price, which can disincentivize them from seeking alternative markets or diversifying their crops. This dependency can be particularly problematic if government policies change or if budget constraints limit the government's ability to maintain these purchasing prices.In conclusion, the state monopoly purchasing price for grain is a double-edged sword. While it provides essential support and stability for farmers, ensuring fair compensation and contributing to food security, it also has the potential to create market inefficiencies and foster dependency. Policymakers must carefully consider these factors when implementing such systems, striving to strike a balance between supporting farmers and promoting a competitive, responsive agricultural market. As we move forward, it is essential to continually assess the impacts of the state monopoly purchasing price for grain to ensure it meets the needs of both producers and consumers effectively.

“国家垄断粮食采购价格”这一概念是许多国家农业经济和政府政策的重要方面。这个术语指的是政府为从农民那里采购粮食而设定的价格，有效地形成了一个垄断，国家成为粮食的唯一买家。这一制度旨在稳定农业市场，确保农民获得公平的价格。在本文中，我将探讨“国家垄断粮食采购价格”对农民、消费者以及整体经济的影响。首先，“国家垄断粮食采购价格”在保护农民收入方面发挥着重要作用。通过建立固定的粮食价格，政府可以保护农民免受由于供需变化而导致的市场波动。例如，在丰收年，由于供给超过需求，粮食价格可能会暴跌。然而，凭借国家设定的价格，农民可以依靠稳定的收入，这鼓励他们投资于更好的农业实践和技术。这种稳定性在农业是大部分人口主要生计来源的发展中国家尤为重要。此外，“国家垄断粮食采购价格”还对食品安全产生积极影响。通过确保农民获得粮食的保证价格，政府可以鼓励增加生产。这反过来有助于保持市场上食品的稳定供应，降低食品短缺和价格飙升的风险，从而危害消费者。此外，当农民获得公平价格的保障时，他们更有可能生产足够的粮食来满足社区的需求，从而促进整体食品安全。然而，“国家垄断粮食采购价格”也受到批评。一个主要问题是它可能导致市场低效。当政府是唯一买家时，它可能无法有效响应消费者偏好或需求变化。这可能导致某些粮食的过度生产，而忽视其他可能需求更高的粮食。此外，垄断可能会抑制竞争，导致生产者的自满，他们可能不会感受到创新或改进产品的压力。此外，“国家垄断粮食采购价格”可能会导致对政府支持的依赖。农民可能会依赖这一保证价格，这可能会使他们失去寻找替代市场或多样化作物的动力。这种依赖在政府政策发生变化或预算限制政府维持这些采购价格的能力时，尤其可能成为问题。总之，“国家垄断粮食采购价格”是一把双刃剑。虽然它为农民提供了必要的支持和稳定，确保公平补偿并促进食品安全，但它也可能导致市场低效并培育依赖。政策制定者在实施此类制度时必须仔细考虑这些因素，努力在支持农民与促进竞争和响应性的农业市场之间取得平衡。随着我们向前发展，持续评估“国家垄断粮食采购价格”的影响，以确保其有效满足生产者和消费者的需求是至关重要的。