degressive tax rate; regressive tax rate

简明释义

累退税率

英英释义

例句

1.Critics of a regressive tax rate 累退税率 claim it exacerbates income inequality in society.

批评累退税率 regressive tax rate 的人声称，它加剧了社会中的收入不平等。

2.Implementing a degressive tax rate 递减税率 could provide greater financial freedom for small businesses.

实施递减税率 degressive tax rate 可能为小型企业提供更大的财务自由。

3.Many economists argue that a degressive tax rate 递减税率 can stimulate investment by allowing businesses to keep more of their earnings.

许多经济学家认为，递减税率 degressive tax rate 可以通过让企业保留更多的收益来刺激投资。

4.A regressive tax rate 累退税率 disproportionately affects low-income individuals, as they pay a higher percentage of their income in taxes compared to wealthier citizens.

一个累退税率 regressive tax rate 不成比例地影响低收入个人，因为他们支付的税款占其收入的百分比比富裕公民更高。

5.Countries with a degressive tax rate 递减税率 often see higher economic growth as businesses reinvest their savings.

拥有递减税率 degressive tax rate 的国家通常会看到更高的经济增长，因为企业会将其节省的资金再投资。

作文

In the world of taxation, understanding various tax structures is crucial for both policymakers and citizens. Two terms that often come up in discussions about tax systems are degressive tax rate and regressive tax rate. These terms describe different approaches to taxation and have significant implications for income distribution and economic equity. A degressive tax rate (递减税率) is a system where the tax rate decreases as the taxable amount increases. This means that individuals or businesses with higher incomes would pay a lower percentage of their income in taxes compared to those with lower incomes. The rationale behind this system is to incentivize investment and spending among wealthier individuals, thereby stimulating economic growth. However, critics argue that it disproportionately benefits the rich and can lead to greater income inequality.On the other hand, a regressive tax rate (累退税率) is a system where the tax rate decreases as the income of the taxpayer increases, but it affects lower-income individuals more severely. In this system, everyone pays the same tax rate regardless of their income level, meaning that a larger portion of a low-income earner's income goes towards taxes compared to a high-income earner. This type of taxation is often criticized for being unfair, as it places a heavier burden on those who can least afford it.The implications of these tax structures are profound. A degressive tax rate can encourage wealth accumulation among the affluent, potentially leading to increased investments in businesses and job creation. However, it can also exacerbate wealth gaps if not balanced with progressive measures. Conversely, a regressive tax rate can stifle economic mobility for lower-income individuals, making it difficult for them to improve their financial situations. As they pay a larger share of their income in taxes, they may struggle to afford basic needs, let alone save for the future.When considering which tax system to adopt, governments must weigh the potential economic benefits against the social implications. A balanced approach may involve integrating elements of both systems, ensuring that while the wealthy are incentivized to invest, the lower-income population is not overburdened by taxes. For instance, a mixed tax system could include a degressive tax rate for higher income brackets while implementing progressive taxes on luxury goods or high-value properties to maintain fairness.Ultimately, the choice between a degressive tax rate and a regressive tax rate should be guided by the overarching goals of the tax system: promoting economic growth, ensuring fairness, and fostering social equity. Policymakers must engage in thorough analysis and public discourse to determine the most effective tax strategy that aligns with the values of society. By doing so, they can create a tax system that not only funds essential services but also supports a fairer distribution of wealth across all income levels.

在税收的世界中，理解各种税制对于政策制定者和公民至关重要。两个常常出现在关于税制讨论中的术语是递减税率和累退税率。这些术语描述了不同的税收方式，并对收入分配和经济公平产生重大影响。递减税率是一种税制，在这种税制中，税率随着应税金额的增加而减少。这意味着收入较高的个人或企业将以较低的百分比缴纳税款，而与收入较低的人相比。该系统背后的理由是激励富裕个人进行投资和消费，从而刺激经济增长。然而，批评者认为，这种制度不成比例地惠及富人，并可能导致更大的收入不平等。另一方面，累退税率是一种税制，在这种税制中，税率随着纳税人收入的增加而减少，但对低收入个人的影响更为严重。在这种制度中，无论收入水平如何，每个人都支付相同的税率，这意味着低收入者的收入中有更大一部分用于缴税，而高收入者则相对较少。这种税收类型通常因不公平而受到批评，因为它对那些最无力承担的人施加了更重的负担。这些税制的影响深远。递减税率可以鼓励富裕阶层的财富积累，可能导致对企业的投资增加和就业机会的创造。然而，如果没有与渐进措施相结合，它也可能加剧财富差距。相反，累退税率可能会抑制低收入个人的经济流动性，使他们难以改善财务状况。由于他们在税收上支付了更大比例的收入，他们可能难以负担基本需求，更不用说为未来储蓄了。在考虑采用哪种税制时，各国政府必须权衡潜在的经济利益与社会影响之间的关系。一个平衡的方法可能涉及整合这两种制度的元素，以确保富人受到投资激励，而低收入群体不会被税收过度负担。例如，混合税制可以对高收入阶层实施递减税率，同时对奢侈品或高价值物业实施渐进税，以保持公平性。最终，在选择递减税率和累退税率之间时，应由税制的总体目标指导：促进经济增长、确保公平和促进社会公平。政策制定者必须进行深入分析和公共讨论，以确定最有效的税收策略，使其与社会的价值观相一致。通过这样做，他们可以创建一个不仅资助基本服务，而且支持所有收入水平的财富更公平分配的税制。