degressive taxation; regressive taxation

简明释义

累退课税，累减课税

英英释义

例句

1.Many economists argue that degressive taxation 递减税制 can stimulate economic growth by providing higher disposable income to middle-income earners.

许多经济学家认为，递减税制 degressive taxation 可以通过为中等收入者提供更高的可支配收入来刺激经济增长。

2.Some countries have implemented degressive taxation 递减税制 to encourage investment and entrepreneurship among small businesses.

一些国家实施了递减税制 degressive taxation，以鼓励小企业的投资和创业。

3.Under a regressive taxation 累退税制 system, lower-income individuals pay a higher percentage of their income in taxes compared to wealthier individuals.

在累退税制 regressive taxation 系统下，低收入个人支付的税收占其收入的比例高于富裕个人。

4.Critics of regressive taxation 累退税制 claim that it disproportionately affects the poor and exacerbates income inequality.

批评累退税制 regressive taxation的人声称，这种制度不成比例地影响穷人，并加剧收入不平等。

5.In a degressive taxation 递减税制 model, tax rates decrease as income increases, which can lead to greater spending power for higher earners.

在递减税制 degressive taxation 模型中，税率随着收入的增加而降低，这可能会导致高收入者的消费能力增强。

作文

Taxation is a fundamental aspect of any economy, influencing both individual behavior and the broader market. Among various taxation systems, two terms often arise in discussions: degressive taxation and regressive taxation. Understanding these concepts is crucial for grasping how tax policies can affect different segments of society.Degressive taxation refers to a tax system where the tax rate decreases as the taxable amount increases. In simpler terms, individuals or corporations that earn more pay a lower percentage of their income in taxes compared to those who earn less. This system is designed to encourage investment and economic growth by allowing higher earners to retain more of their income. Proponents argue that degressive taxation can stimulate spending and investment, leading to job creation and overall economic expansion. However, critics contend that it disproportionately benefits the wealthy and exacerbates income inequality, as lower-income individuals continue to pay a higher percentage of their income in taxes.On the other hand, regressive taxation is a system where the tax rate decreases as the taxable amount increases, but it primarily affects lower-income individuals more severely than higher-income earners. This means that those with lower incomes pay a larger percentage of their income in taxes compared to wealthier individuals. Common examples of regressive taxation include sales taxes and certain excise taxes, which take a larger share of income from low-income households. Critics of regressive taxation argue that it places an undue burden on the poor, making it difficult for them to improve their financial situation. Supporters might claim that such taxes are necessary for funding essential public services, as they are easier to collect and administer.The implications of these taxation systems are significant. A society that adopts degressive taxation may experience short-term economic growth due to increased disposable income among higher earners. However, this could lead to long-term consequences, such as widening income inequality and social unrest. Conversely, while regressive taxation might provide steady revenue for governments, it raises ethical questions about fairness and equity in the tax system. It can create a cycle of poverty, where low-income individuals find it increasingly difficult to escape their financial circumstances due to the high percentage of their income that goes toward taxes.In conclusion, both degressive taxation and regressive taxation have their merits and drawbacks. Policymakers must carefully consider the impacts of these systems on different income groups and strive for a balanced approach that promotes economic growth while ensuring fairness and equity. As we navigate the complexities of taxation, it is essential to engage in informed discussions about the implications of these systems and their effects on society as a whole. By understanding these concepts, we can better advocate for tax policies that serve the interests of all citizens, rather than just a select few.

税收是任何经济体的一个基本方面，影响着个人行为和更广泛的市场。在各种税制中，两个术语常常出现在讨论中：递减税制和累退税制。理解这些概念对于掌握税收政策如何影响社会不同群体至关重要。递减税制是指一种税制，其中税率随着应税金额的增加而减少。简单来说，收入较高的个人或公司支付的税款占其收入的百分比低于收入较低的人。这种制度旨在通过允许高收入者保留更多收入来鼓励投资和经济增长。支持者认为，递减税制可以刺激消费和投资，从而促进就业创造和整体经济扩张。然而，批评者则认为，它对富人有利，加剧了收入不平等，因为低收入者继续以较高的收入比例纳税。另一方面，累退税制是一种税制，其中税率随着应税金额的增加而减少，但它主要对低收入个体的影响比对高收入者更为严重。这意味着低收入者支付的税款占其收入的比例大于富裕个体。累退税制的常见例子包括销售税和某些消费税，这些税对低收入家庭的收入占比较大。累退税制的批评者认为，它对贫困者施加了过重的负担，使他们难以改善财务状况。支持者可能会声称，这种税收对于资助基本公共服务是必要的，因为它们更易于征收和管理。这些税制的影响是显著的。采用递减税制的社会可能会因高收入者的可支配收入增加而经历短期经济增长。然而，这可能导致长期后果，例如收入不平等加剧和社会动荡。相反，尽管累退税制可能为政府提供稳定的收入，但它引发了关于税制公平性和公正性的伦理问题。它可能创造出一种贫困循环，使低收入者发现自己越来越难以逃脱财务困境，因为他们的高比例收入用于纳税。总之，递减税制和累退税制都有其优缺点。政策制定者必须仔细考虑这些系统对不同收入群体的影响，并努力寻求一种平衡的方法，以促进经济增长，同时确保公平和公正。在我们应对税收复杂性时，进行关于这些系统及其对整个社会影响的知情讨论至关重要。通过理解这些概念，我们可以更好地倡导服务于所有公民而非少数特权阶层的税收政策。