allocution

简明释义

英[ˌæləˈkjuːʃ(ə)n]美[ˌæləˈkjʊʃən]

n. 训示

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.This extension is not the same as the so - called "Reverse Allocution" in traditional philology.

这种引申与传统文字学上所说的“反训”不是一回事。

2.This extension is not the same as the so - called "Reverse Allocution" in traditional philology.

这种引申与传统文字学上所说的“反训”不是一回事。

3.Blair: I'm alaccessible yours, you're ruining the affection with all this allocution.

我已经是你的了。你在这个谈话中彻底的损坏了氛围。

4.After the verdict, the convicted felon took a moment for his allocution 陈述 before being led away.

在裁决之后，定罪的罪犯在被带走之前花了一点时间进行他的allocution 陈述。

5.In her allocution 陈述, she apologized to the victims and their families for the pain she caused.

在她的allocution 陈述中，她向受害者及其家属道歉，表示对她造成的痛苦感到遗憾。

6.The lawyer advised his client to prepare a heartfelt allocution 陈述 to mitigate the sentence.

律师建议他的客户准备一份真诚的allocution 陈述以减轻判刑。

7.The judge listened carefully to the allocution 陈述 before deciding on the appropriate sentence.

法官在决定适当的判决之前，仔细听取了allocution 陈述。

8.During the sentencing phase, the defendant delivered an emotional allocution 陈述 to the court, expressing remorse for his actions.

在判刑阶段，被告向法庭做了情感丰富的allocution 陈述，对自己的行为表示悔意。

作文

In the realm of law, the term allocution refers to a formal statement made by a defendant before sentencing. This moment presents an opportunity for the individual to express remorse, provide explanations, or plead for leniency from the judge. The significance of allocution lies in its potential impact on the outcome of a case, as it allows the defendant to humanize themselves and share their perspective on the events that led to their conviction. The process of allocution varies by jurisdiction, but it generally occurs after a guilty plea or a finding of guilt. During this time, the judge often listens attentively, recognizing that the defendant's words can carry weight in determining the appropriate sentence. For many defendants, this is a crucial moment where they can convey their feelings about the crime, their understanding of the harm caused, and their commitment to change. For instance, consider a young man convicted of a non-violent drug offense. During his allocution, he might express deep regret for his actions, acknowledging how his choices affected not only himself but also his family and community. He may highlight his efforts towards rehabilitation, such as attending counseling programs or engaging in community service. This personal narrative can resonate with the judge, potentially influencing a more lenient sentence than what might have been imposed otherwise. Moreover, allocution serves a broader purpose in the judicial system. It emphasizes the importance of personal accountability and the opportunity for redemption. By allowing defendants to speak directly to the court, the justice system acknowledges their humanity and the complexities surrounding their actions. This practice can foster a sense of closure for victims, as they witness the defendant taking responsibility and reflecting on the consequences of their behavior. However, the effectiveness of allocution is not guaranteed. Some judges may be more influenced by the facts of the case and the recommendations from probation officers than by the emotional appeals made during this statement. Additionally, the defendant's demeanor and sincerity play a significant role; a poorly delivered allocution may do more harm than good, leading to perceptions of insincerity or defiance. In conclusion, allocution is a critical component of the sentencing process within the legal framework. It provides defendants with a platform to articulate their thoughts and feelings, potentially swaying the judge's decision. While it carries risks, when done thoughtfully and sincerely, allocution can serve as a powerful tool for personal expression and a step towards rehabilitation. Understanding this concept is essential for anyone involved in or studying the legal system, as it underscores the balance between justice and mercy in our courts. Ultimately, allocution reflects the belief that every individual has a story worth telling, and that even those who have erred deserve a chance to be heard.

在法律领域，术语allocution指的是被告在判刑前所做的正式陈述。这个时刻为个人提供了一个表达悔意、提供解释或请求法官宽恕的机会。allocution的重要性在于它对案件结果的潜在影响，因为它允许被告使自己人性化，并分享导致他们定罪的事件的视角。allocution的过程因管辖权而异，但通常发生在认罪或裁定有罪之后。在此期间，法官通常会认真倾听，因为被告的话语可能在确定适当的判刑中起到重要作用。对于许多被告来说，这是一个关键时刻，他们可以传达对犯罪的感受、对造成的伤害的理解以及改变的承诺。例如，考虑一个因非暴力毒品犯罪而被定罪的年轻人。在他的allocution中，他可能会对自己的行为深感遗憾，承认自己的选择不仅影响了自己，也影响了他的家庭和社区。他可能会强调自己在康复方面的努力，例如参加辅导项目或参与社区服务。这个个人叙述可能会引起法官的共鸣，从而可能影响判处比原本可能施加的更宽松的刑罚。此外，allocution在司法系统中具有更广泛的目的。它强调个人责任的重要性和救赎的机会。通过允许被告直接对法院发言，司法系统承认他们的人性及其行为的复杂性。这一做法可以为受害者提供一种结束感，因为他们目睹被告承担责任并反思其行为的后果。然而，allocution的有效性并不一定得到保证。一些法官可能更受案件事实和缓刑官员建议的影响，而不是被告在此陈述中的情感呼吁。此外，被告的举止和真诚度也起着重要作用；一次表现不佳的allocution可能弊大于利，导致对不真诚或蔑视的看法。总之，allocution是法律框架内判刑过程的一个关键组成部分。它为被告提供了一个表达思想和感受的平台，可能影响法官的决定。虽然存在风险，但如果进行得当且真诚，allocution可以作为个人表达的强大工具，并向康复迈出一步。理解这一概念对于任何参与或研究法律系统的人来说都是至关重要的，因为它突显了我们法庭上正义与仁慈之间的平衡。最终，allocution反映了每个人都有值得讲述的故事的信念，即使那些犯错的人也应有机会被倾听。