controlled monopoly

简明释义

控制性垄断

英英释义

例句

1.The government has established a controlled monopoly 受控垄断 on the production of certain pharmaceuticals to regulate prices.

政府已对某些药品的生产建立了一个受控垄断 controlled monopoly以调控价格。

2.The postal service is often seen as a controlled monopoly 受控垄断 because it is regulated by the government.

邮政服务通常被视为一个受控垄断 controlled monopoly，因为它受到政府的监管。

3.In some countries, the government operates a controlled monopoly 受控垄断 on the energy sector to ensure stable prices.

在一些国家，政府在能源行业运营一个受控垄断 controlled monopoly以确保价格稳定。

4.Telecommunications can sometimes be a controlled monopoly 受控垄断 where one company dominates the market under government oversight.

电信有时可以是一个受控垄断 controlled monopoly，在政府监督下由一家公司主导市场。

5.Critics argue that a controlled monopoly 受控垄断 can lead to inefficiencies and lack of innovation in the market.

批评者认为，受控垄断 controlled monopoly可能导致市场中的低效率和缺乏创新。

作文

In today's economy, the concept of a controlled monopoly is both prevalent and controversial. A controlled monopoly refers to a market structure where a single company or entity has exclusive control over a particular product or service, but this control is regulated by a governing body to prevent abuse of power. This arrangement can be beneficial in certain industries, particularly those that require significant investment and expertise, such as utilities and pharmaceuticals. By allowing a controlled monopoly, governments can ensure that essential services are provided uniformly and efficiently to all citizens.For instance, consider the case of water supply companies. In many cities, there is only one provider of water services. This company operates as a controlled monopoly because the government regulates its prices and service quality. The rationale behind this is that having multiple competing companies could lead to inefficiencies and increased costs for consumers, as each company would need to invest in infrastructure to deliver water. By regulating a controlled monopoly, the government can maintain lower prices and ensure that all residents have access to clean water.However, the existence of a controlled monopoly also raises concerns about the potential for complacency and lack of innovation. When a single entity dominates the market, there may be less incentive to improve services or reduce costs. This is why regulatory bodies play a crucial role in overseeing controlled monopolies. They must ensure that these entities do not exploit their market position by charging excessive prices or providing subpar services.Moreover, the challenge lies in finding the right balance between regulation and competition. While a controlled monopoly can provide stability and reliability, it is essential to foster an environment where innovation can thrive. For example, in the technology sector, companies often operate in highly competitive markets, which drives them to innovate and improve their products continuously. In contrast, a controlled monopoly in this sector might stifle creativity and slow down technological advancements.The debate surrounding controlled monopolies often centers on the question of whether they serve the public interest or primarily benefit the company itself. Critics argue that even with regulation, these monopolies can prioritize profits over people, leading to a decline in service quality. On the other hand, proponents assert that controlled monopolies are necessary to ensure the sustainability of vital services and can operate effectively under proper oversight.Ultimately, the effectiveness of a controlled monopoly depends on the regulatory framework in place and the commitment of the governing bodies to enforce fair practices. Continuous monitoring, transparency, and consumer protection measures are essential to ensure that these monopolies do not take advantage of their position. As we navigate the complexities of modern economies, understanding the implications of controlled monopolies will be vital for policymakers and consumers alike. It is crucial to strike a balance that allows for both stability in essential services and the encouragement of competition and innovation in other sectors. Only then can we harness the benefits of controlled monopolies while minimizing their potential downsides.

在当今经济中，“受控垄断”的概念既普遍又有争议。“受控垄断”是指一种市场结构，其中单一公司或实体对特定产品或服务拥有独占控制权，但这种控制受到监管机构的监管，以防止滥用权力。这种安排在某些行业中可能是有益的，特别是在需要大量投资和专业知识的行业，如公用事业和制药业。通过允许“受控垄断”，政府可以确保所有公民都能统一和有效地获得基本服务。例如，考虑供水公司的案例。在许多城市，只有一个水务服务提供商。该公司作为“受控垄断”运营，因为政府对其价格和服务质量进行监管。这背后的理由是，拥有多个竞争公司可能导致效率低下和消费者成本增加，因为每家公司都需要投资基础设施来提供水。通过监管“受控垄断”，政府可以保持较低的价格，并确保所有居民都能获得干净的水。然而，“受控垄断”的存在也引发了对自满和缺乏创新的潜在担忧。当单一实体主导市场时，改善服务或降低成本的动力可能会减少。这就是监管机构在监督“受控垄断”中发挥关键作用的原因。他们必须确保这些实体不会利用其市场地位，通过收取过高的价格或提供劣质服务来剥削消费者。此外，挑战在于找到监管与竞争之间的正确平衡。虽然“受控垄断”可以提供稳定性和可靠性，但促进创新蓬勃发展的环境同样至关重要。例如，在技术领域，公司通常在高度竞争的市场中运营，这推动他们不断创新和改进产品。相比之下，该领域的“受控垄断”可能会抑制创造力，减缓技术进步。围绕“受控垄断”的辩论通常集中在它们是否服务于公众利益，还是主要使公司本身受益。批评者认为，即使在监管下，这些垄断也可能优先考虑利润而非人民，导致服务质量下降。另一方面，支持者则主张，“受控垄断”是确保重要服务可持续性所必需的，并且在适当的监督下可以有效运作。最终，“受控垄断”的有效性取决于现有的监管框架以及监管机构对执行公平实践的承诺。持续的监测、透明度和消费者保护措施对于确保这些垄断不会利用其地位至关重要。在我们应对现代经济的复杂性时，理解“受控垄断”的影响对于政策制定者和消费者来说都是至关重要的。必须寻求一个既能确保基本服务的稳定性，又能在其他部门鼓励竞争和创新的平衡。只有这样，我们才能在最大程度上发挥“受控垄断”的优势，同时将其潜在的负面影响降到最低。