severable contract; divisible contract

简明释义

可分的合同，可分割的契约

英英释义

例句

1.In a divisible contract, each section can be performed independently without affecting the others.

在一个可分割合同中，每个部分都可以独立执行，而不会影响其他部分。

2.The court ruled that the severable contract allowed for partial performance even if some terms were breached.

法院裁定，该可分割合同允许部分履行，即使某些条款被违反。

3.A construction contract is often considered a divisible contract since it can be completed in phases.

建筑合同通常被视为一个可分割合同，因为它可以分阶段完成。

4.If a severable contract includes multiple provisions, only the invalid provisions can be severed, leaving the valid ones intact.

如果一个可分割合同包含多个条款，只有无效条款可以被分割，保留有效条款。

5.The agreement between the two parties is a severable contract, meaning that if one part fails, the rest can still stand.

双方之间的协议是一个可分割合同，这意味着如果其中一部分失败，其余部分仍然有效。

作文

In the realm of contract law, understanding the distinctions between various types of contracts is crucial for both legal professionals and individuals entering into agreements. Two important concepts that often arise in discussions about contracts are severable contract and divisible contract. While these terms may seem similar, they refer to different aspects of contractual obligations and performance.A severable contract is one where the parties involved can separate their obligations into distinct parts. This means that if one party fails to fulfill their part of the agreement, it does not necessarily affect the entire contract. For instance, consider a scenario where a contractor agrees to build a house and provide landscaping services. If the contractor completes the house but fails to perform the landscaping, the homeowner can still enforce the completion of the house while seeking damages for the landscaping services that were not provided. In this case, the two obligations are independent, making the contract severable.On the other hand, a divisible contract refers to a situation where the contract consists of multiple parts or installments that can be performed separately, but the performance of each part is dependent on the others. For example, if a supplier agrees to deliver goods in three shipments, each shipment being a part of the overall agreement, the failure to deliver one shipment may impact the overall contract. Here, if the supplier fails to deliver the second shipment, the buyer may refuse to pay for the first shipment as well, because the contract is considered indivisible in its entirety despite being broken down into parts.Understanding these differences is essential for parties entering into contracts, as it influences how disputes may be resolved and what remedies are available in the event of a breach. In practice, the determination of whether a contract is severable or divisible can depend on the language used in the contract itself, as well as the intentions of the parties involved. Courts will often look to the specific terms of the contract to ascertain whether the obligations are intended to be independent or interdependent.Additionally, the implications of classifying a contract as severable or divisible can significantly affect the outcome of legal disputes. For instance, if a court finds that a contract is severable, it may allow the non-breaching party to recover damages for the specific part of the contract that was not fulfilled while still enforcing the rest of the agreement. Conversely, if a contract is deemed divisible, a breach of one part may lead to the nullification of the entire contract, leaving the non-breaching party with fewer remedies.In conclusion, the terms severable contract and divisible contract represent critical distinctions in contract law that can have significant implications for the parties involved. Understanding these concepts can help individuals and businesses navigate contractual relationships more effectively and protect their interests in the event of a dispute. By clearly defining the nature of their agreements and being aware of the potential for severability or divisibility, parties can better anticipate the consequences of breaches and ensure that their rights are safeguarded under the law.

在合同法的领域，理解各种合同类型之间的区别对法律专业人士和进入协议的个人来说至关重要。在关于合同的讨论中，两个重要概念经常出现，即可分割合同和可分配合同。尽管这些术语看似相似，但它们指的是合同义务和履行的不同方面。可分割合同是指各方可以将其义务分成不同部分的合同。这意味着如果一方未能履行其协议的一部分，这不会影响整个合同的有效性。例如，考虑一个场景，其中承包商同意建造一座房子并提供园艺服务。如果承包商完成了房屋但未能进行园艺工作，房主仍然可以强制执行房屋的完成，同时寻求未提供园艺服务的赔偿。在这种情况下，两个义务是独立的，使得合同可以分割。另一方面，可分配合同指的是合同由多个部分或分期组成，这些部分可以单独履行，但每个部分的履行依赖于其他部分。例如，如果供应商同意分三批交货，每批都是整体协议的一部分，那么未能交付一批可能会影响整个合同。在这里，如果供应商未能交付第二批，买方也可能拒绝支付第一批，因为尽管合同被分解为部分，但整体上被视为不可分配。理解这些差异对进入合同的各方至关重要，因为这会影响争议的解决方式以及在违约时可用的补救措施。在实践中，确定合同是可分割还是可分配可能取决于合同本身使用的语言，以及相关方的意图。法院通常会查看合同的具体条款，以确定义务是独立的还是相互依赖的。此外，将合同分类为可分割或可分配的含义可能会显著影响法律争议的结果。例如，如果法院发现一份合同是可分割的，它可能允许非违约方就未履行的特定部分索回损害赔偿，同时仍然强制执行协议的其余部分。相反，如果合同被认为是可分配的，则一部分的违约可能导致整个合同的无效，使非违约方的补救措施减少。总之，可分割合同和可分配合同这两个术语代表了合同法中的关键区别，这可能对相关方产生重大影响。理解这些概念可以帮助个人和企业更有效地管理合同关系，并在发生争议时保护他们的利益。通过明确定义协议的性质并意识到可分割性或可分配性的潜在性，各方可以更好地预测违约的后果，并确保其在法律下的权利得到保障。