polemically

简明释义

英[pəˈlɛmɪkli]美[pəˈlɛmɪkli]

adv. 争论地；好争论地

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.And this would be true of Oliver Wendell Holmes or of darwin-things that are intellectual prose that are deliberately polemically argued.

不论是奥利佛·文德尔·荷默斯还是达尔文都是如此——智性散文本来就是论辩论证。

2.And this would be true of Oliver Wendell Holmes or of darwin-things that are intellectual prose that are deliberately polemically argued.

不论是奥利佛·文德尔·荷默斯还是达尔文都是如此——智性散文本来就是论辩论证。

3.She wrote a polemically inclined blog post that criticized the government's policies.

她写了一篇带有争议色彩的博客文章，批评政府的政策。

4.The debate became polemically charged as both sides presented their arguments with fervor.

辩论变得激烈争论，双方都热情地阐述了各自的论点。

5.His polemically driven book sparked a nationwide discussion about education reform.

他那本激烈争论的书籍引发了全国范围内关于教育改革的讨论。

6.The author wrote the article polemically to challenge the prevailing views on climate change.

作者以争论的方式撰写了这篇文章，以挑战气候变化的主流观点。

7.In his speech, he addressed the issue polemically, stirring up controversy among the audience.

在他的演讲中，他以争论的方式讨论了这个问题，引发了观众之间的争议。

作文

In today's world, where information is readily available and opinions are shared at an unprecedented rate, the art of debate has taken on new forms. People often engage in discussions that can become quite heated, especially when it comes to topics that are polarizing. One such example can be found in political discourse, where individuals express their views polemically (争论地), often leading to fierce arguments rather than constructive conversations. This phenomenon raises questions about the effectiveness of such debates and the impact they have on society as a whole.When discussing sensitive issues like climate change, immigration, or social justice, many people tend to adopt a polemically (争论地) charged tone, which can alienate those who hold opposing views. Instead of fostering understanding and collaboration, these discussions often devolve into shouting matches, where each side tries to outdo the other with facts, figures, and emotional appeals. The result is not only a lack of resolution but also a deepening of the divide between differing perspectives.Moreover, the rise of social media has exacerbated this issue. Platforms like Twitter and Facebook allow users to share their thoughts instantly, but they also encourage brevity and sensationalism. As a result, many individuals resort to polemically (争论地) phrased statements that are designed to provoke rather than enlighten. This trend is troubling because it leads to a culture of outrage, where people are more focused on winning arguments than seeking truth or understanding.To illustrate this point, consider the debates surrounding vaccination. In recent years, the conversation has become highly polemically (争论地) charged, with strong opinions on both sides. Proponents argue vehemently for the safety and efficacy of vaccines, while opponents raise concerns about potential side effects and government overreach. Unfortunately, the tone of these discussions often becomes so heated that it overshadows the important scientific data that should inform the conversation. Instead of engaging in a rational exchange of ideas, many individuals resort to dismissive rhetoric, which only serves to entrench existing beliefs.The challenge, then, is to find a way to engage in discussions that are less polemically (争论地) driven and more focused on dialogue and understanding. This requires a shift in mindset, where individuals prioritize listening over speaking, and empathy over indignation. It is essential to recognize that every argument has multiple sides, and approaching conversations with an open mind can lead to more productive outcomes.In conclusion, the prevalence of polemically (争论地) charged discussions in our society poses significant challenges to effective communication and understanding. While it is natural to feel passionate about our beliefs, it is crucial to remember that true progress often comes from respectful dialogue rather than combative exchanges. By striving to engage in conversations that are thoughtful and inclusive, we can work towards bridging divides and fostering a more harmonious society.

在当今这个信息随时可得、意见以空前的速度分享的世界里，辩论的艺术呈现出新的形式。人们经常参与到可能变得相当激烈的讨论中，特别是当涉及到两极化的话题时。其中一个例子可以在政治话语中找到，个人往往以polemically（争论地）表达他们的观点，这常常导致激烈的争论，而不是建设性的对话。这种现象引发了关于此类辩论有效性及其对社会整体影响的问题。当讨论气候变化、移民或社会正义等敏感问题时，许多人倾向于采用一种polemically（争论地）充满情绪的语气，这可能会使持有对立观点的人感到疏远。与其促进理解和合作，这些讨论往往沦为争吵，各方试图用事实、数字和情感诉求来超越对方。结果不仅缺乏解决方案，还加深了不同观点之间的分歧。此外，社交媒体的兴起使这一问题更加严重。像Twitter和Facebook这样的平台允许用户即时分享他们的想法，但也鼓励简洁和耸人听闻。因此，许多人诉诸于polemically（争论地）措辞的声明，这些声明旨在挑衅而非启发。这一趋势令人担忧，因为它导致了一种愤怒文化，人们更关注赢得争论而不是寻求真理或理解。为了说明这一点，考虑一下围绕疫苗接种的辩论。近年来，这一话题变得高度polemically（争论地）充满情绪，双方都有强烈的观点。支持者强烈主张疫苗的安全性和有效性，而反对者则对潜在副作用和政府干预表示担忧。不幸的是，这些讨论的语气往往变得如此激烈，以至于掩盖了应该为对话提供依据的重要科学数据。与其进行理性的思想交流，许多人却诉诸于轻蔑的修辞，这只会巩固已有的信念。因此，挑战在于找到一种方式，参与到不那么polemically（争论地）驱动的讨论中，更加注重对话和理解。这需要心态的转变，个人优先考虑倾听而非发言，优先考虑同理心而非愤慨。必须认识到，每个论点都有多个方面，以开放的心态参与谈话可以导致更富有成效的结果。总之，社会中polemically（争论地）充满情绪的讨论的普遍存在对有效沟通和理解构成了重大挑战。虽然对我们的信念感到热情是自然的，但至关重要的是要记住，真正的进步往往来自于尊重的对话，而非对抗性的交流。通过努力参与到深思熟虑和包容的对话中，我们可以朝着弥合分歧和促进更加和谐的社会迈进。