system of share-cropping of net income

简明释义

净收入分成制

英英释义

例句

1.By adopting a system of share-cropping of net income, we can reduce conflicts over land usage.

通过采用净收入分成的承包制，我们可以减少对土地使用的冲突。

2.The farmers' association is promoting a system of share-cropping of net income to increase agricultural productivity.

农民协会正在推广一种净收入分成的承包制，以提高农业生产力。

3.The local farmers decided to implement a system of share-cropping of net income to ensure fair distribution of profits.

当地农民决定实施一种净收入分成的承包制，以确保利润的公平分配。

4.The system of share-cropping of net income allows landowners and tenants to collaborate effectively.

这种净收入分成的承包制使土地所有者和租户能够有效合作。

5.In our community, the system of share-cropping of net income has helped many families thrive financially.

在我们的社区中，净收入分成的承包制帮助许多家庭在经济上蓬勃发展。

作文

The concept of a system of share-cropping of net income refers to an agricultural arrangement where landowners allow tenants to work their land in exchange for a share of the crop produced. This system has historical roots, particularly in the post-Civil War United States, where it became a way for formerly enslaved individuals to earn a living. In this arrangement, the landowner provides the land, while the tenant supplies labor and sometimes additional inputs such as seeds and tools. The final product is then divided according to an agreed-upon formula, which is often based on the net income generated from the crops harvested.One of the primary advantages of the system of share-cropping of net income is that it allows individuals who may not have the capital to purchase land to still participate in agriculture. This can be particularly beneficial in rural areas where employment opportunities are limited. Sharecroppers can gain valuable experience in farming and may eventually save enough money to invest in their own land.However, this system is not without its drawbacks. Often, the terms of the sharecropping agreement can be heavily skewed in favor of the landowner. For instance, landowners may charge exorbitant prices for the tools and seeds provided, effectively reducing the net income that the tenant receives. Additionally, because sharecroppers do not own the land, they may have little incentive to improve the land or invest in sustainable practices. This can lead to soil depletion and other environmental issues over time.Moreover, the system of share-cropping of net income can create a cycle of debt for tenants. If the crop yield is poor due to bad weather or pests, sharecroppers may find themselves unable to pay back debts incurred from purchasing supplies. This can trap them in a cycle of poverty, making it difficult to escape the sharecropping system altogether. In many cases, sharecroppers end up working the land for years without ever achieving financial independence.In modern contexts, variations of the system of share-cropping of net income continue to exist, particularly in developing countries where land ownership is concentrated among a small number of wealthy individuals. While the specifics may vary, the fundamental principles remain the same: tenants provide labor in exchange for a portion of the income generated from the land. This system can still serve as a means of livelihood for many, but it also raises questions about fairness, equity, and the long-term sustainability of agricultural practices.To address some of the challenges posed by the system of share-cropping of net income, various reforms have been proposed. These include implementing fairer contracts that ensure a more equitable distribution of profits, providing education and resources to help sharecroppers improve their farming techniques, and promoting cooperative farming models where multiple farmers can pool resources and share profits more equitably.In conclusion, while the system of share-cropping of net income has historically provided opportunities for individuals to engage in agriculture, it is essential to recognize and address its inherent challenges. By striving for more equitable systems and supporting sustainable practices, we can help ensure that agricultural arrangements benefit all parties involved, fostering a more just and productive agricultural landscape.

“净收入分成制度”是指一种农业安排，土地所有者允许租户耕作他们的土地，以换取所生产作物的一部分。这一制度有着历史根源，尤其是在美国内战后，成为了曾经被奴役的人们谋生的一种方式。在这种安排中，土地所有者提供土地，而租户则提供劳动，有时还需提供额外的投入，如种子和工具。最终产品按照约定的公式进行分配，通常基于收获作物所产生的净收入。“净收入分成制度”的主要优点之一是，它允许那些可能没有资本购买土地的人仍然参与农业。这在就业机会有限的农村地区尤其有利。佃农可以获得宝贵的耕作经验，并可能最终存够钱投资自己的土地。然而，这一制度并非没有缺点。通常，分成协议的条款可能严重偏向土地所有者。例如，土地所有者可能会以高价出售提供的工具和种子，从而有效减少租户所获得的净收入。此外，由于佃农不拥有土地，他们可能对改善土地或投资可持续实践的动力不足。这会导致土壤退化和其他环境问题的出现。此外，“净收入分成制度”还可能为租户创造债务循环。如果由于恶劣天气或害虫导致作物丰收不佳，佃农可能发现自己无法偿还因购买供应品而产生的债务。这可能使他们陷入贫困循环，使他们很难彻底摆脱分成制度。在许多情况下，佃农在土地上工作多年，却始终无法实现经济独立。在现代背景下，类似于“净收入分成制度”的变体仍然存在，特别是在土地所有权集中于少数富裕个人的发展中国家。尽管具体情况可能有所不同，但基本原则依然相同：租户提供劳动，以换取从土地上产生的一部分收入。这一制度仍然可以作为许多人的生计手段，但也引发了关于公平、平等和农业实践长期可持续性的问题。为了应对“净收入分成制度”所带来的挑战，提出了各种改革建议。这些建议包括实施更公平的合同，以确保利润的更公平分配，提供教育和资源，帮助佃农改善耕作技术，以及推广合作农业模式，让多个农民能够共同出资并更公平地分享利润。总之，尽管“净收入分成制度”历史上为个人参与农业提供了机会，但重要的是要认识到并解决其固有的挑战。通过努力追求更公平的制度并支持可持续实践，我们可以帮助确保农业安排惠及所有相关方，促进一个更加公正和富有成效的农业景观。