jury of executive opinion method

简明释义

经理人员集体审定法

英英释义

例句

1.For the new product launch, the team gathered a panel of senior managers to apply the jury of executive opinion method 高管意见评审法.

为了新产品发布，团队召集了一组高级经理来应用高管意见评审法 jury of executive opinion method。

2.The jury of executive opinion method 高管意见评审法 helped the firm quickly adapt to market changes by leveraging experienced leaders' perspectives.

通过利用经验丰富的领导者的观点，高管意见评审法 jury of executive opinion method 帮助公司迅速适应市场变化。

3.The marketing team decided to use the jury of executive opinion method 高管意见评审法 to forecast next quarter's sales.

市场团队决定使用高管意见评审法 jury of executive opinion method 来预测下个季度的销售。

4.In the absence of hard data, the company relied on the jury of executive opinion method 高管意见评审法 for making strategic decisions.

在缺乏硬数据的情况下，公司依赖于高管意见评审法 jury of executive opinion method 来做出战略决策。

5.During the annual planning meeting, executives utilized the jury of executive opinion method 高管意见评审法 to gather insights from various departments.

在年度规划会议上，高管们利用高管意见评审法 jury of executive opinion method 从各部门收集见解。

作文

In the realm of business and management, decision-making plays a crucial role in determining the success or failure of an organization. One of the methods that has gained popularity for making strategic decisions is the jury of executive opinion method. This technique involves gathering insights and opinions from a group of executives or experienced professionals within a company to arrive at a consensus on important issues or forecasts. The jury of executive opinion method is particularly valuable because it leverages the collective knowledge and experience of seasoned leaders, which can lead to more informed and effective decision-making.The process typically begins with identifying the key executives who possess relevant expertise and insights into the subject matter at hand. These individuals are then brought together to discuss the issues, share their perspectives, and provide their forecasts. The discussions can cover various topics, such as market trends, product development, or financial projections. By pooling their opinions, the executives can identify common themes and divergent views, which helps to create a more comprehensive understanding of the situation.One of the primary advantages of the jury of executive opinion method is that it allows organizations to tap into the rich reservoir of knowledge that exists within their leadership team. Each executive brings a unique perspective based on their experiences, skills, and areas of expertise. This diversity of thought can lead to innovative solutions and strategies that may not have been considered if decisions were made in isolation.Moreover, the jury of executive opinion method fosters collaboration and teamwork among executives. When leaders come together to discuss and deliberate on important issues, it encourages open communication and strengthens relationships within the organization. This collaborative environment can enhance trust and respect among team members, ultimately leading to a more cohesive and motivated leadership team.However, there are also challenges associated with the jury of executive opinion method. One potential drawback is the risk of groupthink, where the desire for harmony and consensus leads to poor decision-making. If executives feel pressured to conform to the majority opinion, they may suppress their own ideas and concerns, resulting in suboptimal outcomes. To mitigate this risk, it is essential for organizations to create an environment that encourages healthy debate and values diverse viewpoints.Additionally, the effectiveness of the jury of executive opinion method can be influenced by the composition of the executive team. If the group lacks diversity in terms of backgrounds, experiences, or perspectives, it may limit the range of ideas and solutions generated during the discussions. Therefore, organizations should strive to assemble a well-rounded team of executives who can contribute varied insights and challenge each other's assumptions.In conclusion, the jury of executive opinion method is a valuable tool for organizations seeking to enhance their decision-making processes. By leveraging the collective wisdom of experienced executives, companies can make more informed choices that align with their strategic goals. However, it is crucial to remain aware of the potential pitfalls, such as groupthink and lack of diversity, to ensure that the method yields the best possible outcomes. Ultimately, when executed effectively, the jury of executive opinion method can lead to stronger leadership, better collaboration, and improved organizational performance.

在商业和管理领域，决策在决定组织的成功或失败中起着至关重要的作用。逐渐受到重视的一种战略决策方法是高管意见评审法。该技术涉及从公司内部的一组高管或经验丰富的专业人士那里收集见解和意见，以达成关于重要问题或预测的共识。高管意见评审法尤其有价值，因为它利用了资深领导者的集体知识和经验，这可以导致更明智和有效的决策。这一过程通常始于确定具有相关专业知识和洞察力的关键高管。这些人随后被聚集在一起讨论问题，分享他们的看法，并提供他们的预测。讨论可以涵盖各种主题，例如市场趋势、产品开发或财务预测。通过汇集他们的意见，高管们能够识别共同主题和不同观点，从而帮助创造对情况的更全面理解。高管意见评审法的主要优势之一是，它允许组织利用其领导团队中丰富的知识储备。每位高管根据自己的经验、技能和专业领域带来了独特的视角。这种思维的多样性可以导致创新的解决方案和战略，而这些在单独做出决策时可能不会被考虑。此外，高管意见评审法促进了高管之间的合作与团队合作。当领导者聚集在一起讨论和审议重要问题时，它鼓励开放的沟通并增强组织内的关系。这种协作环境可以增强团队成员之间的信任和尊重，最终导致更具凝聚力和动力的领导团队。然而，高管意见评审法也存在一些挑战。其中一个潜在缺点是群体思维的风险，即为了和谐与共识的渴望导致糟糕的决策。如果高管感到压力去迎合多数意见，他们可能会压抑自己的想法和担忧，从而导致次优结果。为了减轻这种风险，组织必须创造一种鼓励健康辩论并重视多样化观点的环境。此外，高管意见评审法的有效性可能会受到高管团队组成的影响。如果该小组在背景、经验或观点上缺乏多样性，可能会限制在讨论中产生的想法和解决方案的范围。因此，组织应努力组建一个全面的高管团队，以便能够贡献多样化的见解并挑战彼此的假设。总之，高管意见评审法是一个有价值的工具，适用于希望增强决策过程的组织。通过利用经验丰富的高管的集体智慧，公司可以做出更明智的选择，从而与其战略目标保持一致。然而，必须意识到潜在的陷阱，例如群体思维和缺乏多样性，以确保该方法产生最佳结果。最终，当有效执行时，高管意见评审法可以导致更强大的领导力、更好的合作和改善的组织绩效。