criterion for appraising economic results

简明释义

经济效果的评价标准

英英释义

例句

1.To improve accountability, the organization revised its criterion for appraising economic results 评估经济成果的标准 to include social impacts.

为了提高问责制，该组织修订了其criterion for appraising economic results 评估经济成果的标准，以包括社会影响。

2.In our annual report, we highlight the criterion for appraising economic results 评估经济成果的标准 to provide transparency to stakeholders.

在我们的年度报告中，我们强调了criterion for appraising economic results 评估经济成果的标准以向利益相关者提供透明度。

3.Investors often look for a clear criterion for appraising economic results 评估经济成果的标准 before committing their funds.

投资者通常在投入资金之前寻找明确的criterion for appraising economic results 评估经济成果的标准。

4.The government established a new criterion for appraising economic results 评估经济成果的标准 to measure the effectiveness of its policies.

政府建立了新的criterion for appraising economic results 评估经济成果的标准以衡量其政策的有效性。

5.The company uses a strict criterion for appraising economic results 评估经济成果的标准 to ensure that all investments are justified.

公司使用严格的criterion for appraising economic results 评估经济成果的标准来确保所有投资都是合理的。

作文

In today's rapidly evolving economic landscape, businesses and governments alike are faced with the daunting task of evaluating their performance and making informed decisions. One critical aspect of this evaluation process is the establishment of a reliable criterion for appraising economic results. This phrase refers to the standards or benchmarks used to assess the effectiveness and efficiency of economic activities. By implementing such criteria, organizations can gain insights into their financial health, operational success, and overall impact on the economy.To understand the importance of a criterion for appraising economic results, it is essential to recognize the various dimensions that contribute to economic performance. These dimensions include profitability, productivity, sustainability, and social responsibility. Each of these factors plays a significant role in determining the success of an organization and its contribution to the broader economy.Profitability is often the primary focus when assessing economic results. It reflects how well a company generates income relative to its expenses. A robust criterion for evaluating profitability might include metrics such as net profit margin, return on assets, and return on equity. These indicators provide a clear picture of financial performance and help stakeholders make informed decisions about investments and resource allocation.Productivity is another vital aspect that should be considered when establishing a criterion for appraising economic results. Productivity measures the efficiency of production processes and the effectiveness of resource utilization. High productivity levels indicate that an organization is maximizing its output while minimizing costs. Common metrics for assessing productivity include output per labor hour and total factor productivity. By focusing on productivity, organizations can identify areas for improvement and drive innovation.Sustainability has become increasingly important in recent years, as stakeholders demand that companies operate responsibly and ethically. A comprehensive criterion for appraising economic results should incorporate sustainability metrics, such as carbon footprint, waste management practices, and resource conservation efforts. By evaluating economic results through a sustainability lens, organizations can ensure that they contribute positively to the environment and society while maintaining their financial viability.Lastly, social responsibility is an essential component of modern economic evaluation. Companies are expected to consider the social implications of their operations and contribute to the well-being of their communities. A well-rounded criterion for appraising economic results should include measures of corporate social responsibility (CSR), such as community engagement, employee welfare, and ethical business practices. By prioritizing social responsibility, organizations can enhance their reputation, build customer loyalty, and ultimately drive long-term success.In conclusion, establishing a robust criterion for appraising economic results is crucial for organizations seeking to navigate the complexities of today's economic environment. By considering multiple dimensions such as profitability, productivity, sustainability, and social responsibility, businesses can gain a comprehensive understanding of their performance and make informed decisions. As the economic landscape continues to evolve, the need for effective appraisal criteria will only grow, guiding organizations toward sustainable success and positive contributions to society.

在当今快速发展的经济环境中，企业和政府面临着评估其绩效和做出明智决策的艰巨任务。评估过程中的一个关键方面是建立一个可靠的评价经济结果的标准。这个短语指的是用于评估经济活动有效性和效率的标准或基准。通过实施这些标准，组织可以洞察其财务健康状况、运营成功以及对经济的整体影响。要理解评价经济结果的标准的重要性，必须认识到影响经济绩效的各个维度。这些维度包括盈利能力、生产力、可持续性和社会责任。每一个因素在确定一个组织的成功及其对更广泛经济的贡献方面都扮演着重要角色。盈利能力通常是评估经济结果时的主要关注点。它反映了公司相对于其开支的收入生成能力。评估盈利能力的一个强有力的标准可能包括净利润率、资产回报率和股本回报率等指标。这些指标提供了财务表现的清晰图景，并帮助利益相关者就投资和资源分配做出明智的决策。生产力是建立评价经济结果的标准时另一个重要方面。生产力衡量生产过程的效率和资源利用的有效性。高生产力水平表明一个组织正在最大化其产出，同时最小化成本。评估生产力的常用指标包括每工时产出和全要素生产率。通过关注生产力，组织可以识别改进领域并推动创新。可持续性在近年来变得越来越重要，因为利益相关者要求公司以负责任和伦理的方式运营。全面的评价经济结果的标准应包含可持续性指标，例如碳足迹、废物管理实践和资源保护努力。通过从可持续性的角度评估经济结果，组织可以确保他们对环境和社会做出积极贡献，同时保持财务可行性。最后，社会责任是现代经济评估的重要组成部分。公司被期望考虑其运营的社会影响，并为社区的福祉做出贡献。一个全面的评价经济结果的标准应包括企业社会责任（CSR）的衡量标准，例如社区参与、员工福利和道德商业实践。通过优先考虑社会责任，组织可以提升其声誉，建立客户忠诚度，最终推动长期成功。总之，建立一个强有力的评价经济结果的标准对寻求在当今经济环境中导航的组织至关重要。通过考虑盈利能力、生产力、可持续性和社会责任等多个维度，企业可以全面了解其绩效并做出明智的决策。随着经济环境的不断变化，对有效评估标准的需求只会增加，引导组织走向可持续成功和对社会的积极贡献。