prohibitive import duties

简明释义

禁止性进口税

英英释义

例句

1.Due to the prohibitive import duties, local manufacturers struggle to compete with international brands.

由于高额进口关税，当地制造商难以与国际品牌竞争。

2.The company had to abandon its plans to expand into the new market due to the prohibitive import duties.

由于高额进口关税，公司不得不放弃在新市场扩张的计划。

3.The startup faced significant challenges because of the prohibitive import duties on raw materials.

由于原材料的高额进口关税，这家初创公司面临重大挑战。

4.Many consumers are frustrated by the prohibitive import duties on electronics, making them unaffordable.

许多消费者对电子产品的高额进口关税感到沮丧，这使得这些产品变得无法负担。

5.The government is considering reducing prohibitive import duties to encourage foreign investment.

政府正在考虑降低高额进口关税以鼓励外资投资。

作文

In today's globalized economy, international trade plays a crucial role in the growth and development of nations. However, various barriers can hinder this trade, one of which is the imposition of prohibitive import duties. These duties are taxes imposed by governments on imported goods that are so high they effectively prevent foreign products from entering the domestic market. As a result, prohibitive import duties (禁止性进口关税) can have significant implications for both consumers and businesses alike.To understand the impact of prohibitive import duties, we must first consider their purpose. Governments often impose these duties to protect local industries from foreign competition. By making imported goods more expensive, authorities aim to encourage consumers to buy domestically produced items. While this may seem beneficial for local manufacturers, it can lead to several unintended consequences.One major consequence of prohibitive import duties is the limitation of consumer choices. When foreign products are priced out of the market, consumers are left with fewer options. This lack of variety can lead to higher prices for the limited goods available, ultimately harming the very individuals the government aims to protect. For instance, if a country imposes high tariffs on imported electronics, consumers may have to settle for lower-quality domestic alternatives at inflated prices.Moreover, prohibitive import duties can stifle innovation and competitiveness within local industries. Without the pressure of foreign competition, domestic companies may lack the incentive to improve their products or reduce costs. This complacency can result in stagnation, where local firms fail to keep pace with global advancements. In contrast, countries that maintain lower import duties often experience a dynamic marketplace, fostering innovation as businesses strive to meet consumer demands.Additionally, prohibitive import duties can lead to retaliatory measures from trading partners. When one country imposes high tariffs, affected nations may respond by implementing their own duties on imports from the original country. This tit-for-tat approach can escalate into trade wars, ultimately harming the economies of all involved. For example, during recent trade tensions between major economies, both sides enacted prohibitive import duties on a range of products, leading to increased prices and reduced availability for consumers worldwide.Furthermore, prohibitive import duties can disproportionately affect low-income households. As prices rise due to these tariffs, families with limited budgets may struggle to afford essential goods. This situation exacerbates existing inequalities, as wealthier individuals can still access a broader range of products, while those with fewer resources are left with subpar options.In conclusion, while the intention behind imposing prohibitive import duties may be to protect local industries, the consequences can be far-reaching and detrimental. From limiting consumer choices and stifling innovation to sparking international trade disputes and exacerbating social inequalities, the negative impacts are significant. Policymakers must carefully weigh the benefits and drawbacks of such measures, considering the long-term effects on both the economy and society. A balanced approach that encourages fair competition while protecting domestic interests may be the key to fostering a healthy trade environment that benefits all parties involved.

在当今全球化经济中，国际贸易在国家的增长和发展中扮演着至关重要的角色。然而，各种障碍可能会阻碍这种贸易，其中之一就是征收禁止性进口关税。这些关税是各国政府对进口商品征收的税费，其税率高到实际上阻止外国产品进入国内市场。因此，禁止性进口关税（prohibitive import duties）对消费者和企业都有重大影响。要理解禁止性进口关税的影响，我们必须首先考虑其目的。各国政府通常会征收这些关税，以保护本国工业免受外国竞争的冲击。通过提高进口商品的价格，政府旨在鼓励消费者购买本国生产的商品。虽然这对当地制造商似乎有利，但可能导致若干意想不到的后果。禁止性进口关税的一个主要后果是限制消费者的选择。当外国产品在市场上被定价排除时，消费者将面临更少的选择。这种缺乏多样性可能导致有限商品的价格上涨，最终伤害到政府旨在保护的那些个人。例如，如果一个国家对进口电子产品征收高额关税，消费者可能不得不接受质量较低的国内替代品，且价格被抬高。此外，禁止性进口关税可能会抑制当地产业的创新和竞争力。如果没有外国竞争的压力，本地公司可能缺乏改进产品或降低成本的动力。这种自满可能导致停滞，即当地公司未能跟上全球发展的步伐。相比之下，保持较低进口关税的国家往往会经历一个充满活力的市场环境，促进创新，因为企业努力满足消费者的需求。此外，禁止性进口关税可能导致贸易伙伴的报复性措施。当一个国家征收高额关税时，受影响的国家可能会通过对原国的进口商品实施自己的关税来回应。这种以牙还牙的方法可能升级为贸易战，最终损害所有相关国家的经济。例如，在近期主要经济体之间的贸易紧张局势中，双方对一系列产品实施了禁止性进口关税，导致全球消费者的价格上涨和可用性降低。最后，禁止性进口关税可能对低收入家庭产生不成比例的影响。由于这些关税导致价格上涨，预算有限的家庭可能难以负担基本商品。这种情况加剧了现有的不平等，因为富裕的人仍然可以获得更广泛的产品，而资源有限的人则只能得到次优的选择。总之，尽管征收禁止性进口关税的初衷可能是保护本国工业，但其后果可能是深远而有害的。从限制消费者选择和抑制创新，到引发国际贸易争端和加剧社会不平等，这些负面影响都很显著。政策制定者必须仔细权衡这些措施的利弊，考虑其对经济和社会的长期影响。鼓励公平竞争，同时保护国内利益的平衡方法，可能是促进一个健康贸易环境的关键，从而使所有相关方受益。