prohibitive tariff; prohibitive duty

简明释义

禁止性关税

英英释义

例句

1.The government imposed a prohibitive tariff 禁止性关税 on imported luxury cars to protect local manufacturers.

政府对进口奢侈汽车施加了禁止性关税 禁止性关税以保护本地制造商。

2.Due to the prohibitive duty 禁止性关税 on electronics, many consumers are turning to local products.

由于电子产品的禁止性关税 禁止性关税，许多消费者转向本地产品。

3.The prohibitive tariff 禁止性关税 on steel imports has led to increased prices for construction projects.

对钢铁进口的禁止性关税 禁止性关税导致建筑项目的价格上涨。

4.The introduction of a prohibitive tariff 禁止性关税 on sugar has sparked debates among consumers and producers alike.

对糖的引入的禁止性关税 禁止性关税引发了消费者和生产者之间的辩论。

5.Many countries have resorted to prohibitive duties 禁止性关税 as a means of protecting their agriculture sector.

许多国家采取禁止性关税 禁止性关税作为保护农业部门的一种手段。

作文

In the realm of international trade, the concept of tariffs plays a crucial role in shaping economic policies and influencing market dynamics. Among various types of tariffs, the term prohibitive tariff refers to a tax imposed on imported goods that is set at such a high level that it effectively discourages or completely prevents the importation of those goods into a country. This type of tariff is often used by governments to protect domestic industries from foreign competition. For instance, if a country imposes a prohibitive duty on a particular product, the cost of importing that product becomes so exorbitant that consumers are likely to seek alternatives produced locally, thereby boosting the domestic economy. The implications of prohibitive tariffs and prohibitive duties extend beyond mere economics; they can also affect diplomatic relations between countries. When one nation imposes such tariffs, it may lead to retaliation from affected countries, resulting in a trade war that can escalate tensions and disrupt global trade networks. For example, during the recent trade disputes between major economies, we witnessed how the imposition of prohibitive tariffs led to a series of retaliatory measures that ultimately harmed not only the countries involved but also their trading partners.From an economic perspective, while prohibitive tariffs aim to safeguard local industries, they can also lead to higher prices for consumers. When imports are curtailed due to high tariffs, the supply of goods diminishes, which can result in inflated prices for consumers who now have fewer options available. This situation can disproportionately affect lower-income households, as they may struggle to afford the increased costs of essential goods. Therefore, while the intention behind imposing prohibitive duties might be to protect domestic jobs, the broader economic consequences must be carefully considered.Moreover, the effectiveness of prohibitive tariffs in achieving their intended goals is often debated among economists. Some argue that such tariffs can lead to inefficiencies within domestic industries, as they may become complacent without the pressure of foreign competition. On the other hand, proponents believe that protecting nascent industries through prohibitive duties can allow them to grow and eventually compete on a global scale. This ongoing debate highlights the complexity of trade policies and the need for a balanced approach that considers both protectionism and free trade principles.In conclusion, while prohibitive tariffs and prohibitive duties serve as tools for governments to regulate trade and protect local economies, their implementation comes with significant repercussions. It is essential for policymakers to weigh the benefits of protecting domestic industries against the potential drawbacks, including higher consumer prices and strained international relations. Ultimately, the challenge lies in finding a middle ground that fosters economic growth while maintaining healthy trade relationships with other nations. As the global economy continues to evolve, the discourse surrounding tariffs will remain a critical aspect of international trade discussions, necessitating ongoing analysis and adaptation to changing circumstances.

在国际贸易的领域中，关税的概念在塑造经济政策和影响市场动态方面发挥着至关重要的作用。在各种类型的关税中，prohibitive tariff（禁止性关税）是指对进口商品征收的税率设定得如此之高，以至于有效地阻止或完全防止这些商品进入一个国家。这种类型的关税通常被政府用来保护国内行业免受外国竞争的影响。例如，如果一个国家对某种产品征收prohibitive duty（禁止性税），那么进口该产品的成本将变得极其昂贵，以至于消费者可能会寻求当地生产的替代品，从而促进国内经济。prohibitive tariffs和prohibitive duties的影响不仅限于经济层面；它们还可能影响国家之间的外交关系。当一个国家施加此类关税时，可能会导致受影响国家的报复，进而引发贸易战，这可能加剧紧张局势并破坏全球贸易网络。例如，在最近主要经济体之间的贸易争端中，我们目睹了prohibitive tariffs的实施如何导致一系列报复措施，最终不仅伤害了相关国家，还影响了它们的贸易伙伴。从经济角度来看，虽然prohibitive tariffs旨在保护地方产业，但它们也可能导致消费者价格上涨。当由于高关税而减少进口时，商品供应减少，这可能导致消费者面临更高的价格，因为他们现在可供选择的商品更少。因此，虽然施加prohibitive duties的意图可能是保护国内就业，但必须仔细考虑更广泛的经济后果。此外，关于prohibitive tariffs在实现其预期目标方面的有效性，经济学家们常常进行辩论。一些人认为，这种关税可能导致国内产业效率低下，因为它们在没有外国竞争压力的情况下可能变得自满。另一方面，支持者认为，通过prohibitive duties保护新兴产业，可以使它们成长并最终在全球范围内竞争。这场持续的辩论突显了贸易政策的复杂性，以及需要采取一种平衡的方法，既考虑保护主义，又考虑自由贸易原则。总之，虽然prohibitive tariffs和prohibitive duties作为政府调节贸易和保护地方经济的工具，但其实施带来了显著的后果。政策制定者必须权衡保护国内产业的好处与潜在的缺点，包括消费者价格上涨和国际关系紧张。最终，挑战在于找到一个促进经济增长的中间道路，同时与其他国家保持健康的贸易关系。随着全球经济的不断演变，围绕关税的讨论将继续成为国际贸易讨论的关键方面，亟需对不断变化的情况进行持续分析和调整。