apportion forbidden from enterprise

简明释义

禁止向企业摊派

英英释义

例句

1.The audit revealed that funds apportion forbidden from enterprise had been mismanaged.

审计显示，禁止从企业中分配的资金被错误管理。

2.Employees were reminded that bonuses apportion forbidden from enterprise are not allowed under the new regulations.

员工们被提醒，根据新规，奖金禁止从企业中分配。

3.The company policy states that resources should be apportion forbidden from enterprise without proper authorization.

公司政策规定，资源应当在未获得适当授权的情况下被禁止分配给企业。

4.To maintain ethical standards, any profits apportion forbidden from enterprise will be investigated.

为了维护伦理标准，任何禁止从企业中分配的利润都将受到调查。

5.Our legal team has advised that any assets apportion forbidden from enterprise could lead to serious consequences.

我们的法律团队已建议，任何禁止从企业中分配的资产可能会导致严重后果。

作文

In today's rapidly evolving business landscape, the concept of ethical practices has gained unprecedented importance. Companies are constantly navigating the complex interplay between profit-making and social responsibility. One critical aspect of this navigation is understanding the phrase apportion forbidden from enterprise, which emphasizes the need to separate unethical practices from legitimate business operations. This principle serves as a guiding light for organizations aiming to maintain integrity while pursuing their goals.When we talk about apportion forbidden from enterprise (将禁止的行为与企业活动分开), we refer to the necessity of distinguishing between what is acceptable and what is not in the realm of business. It highlights the importance of ensuring that all activities undertaken by an enterprise are in compliance with legal standards and ethical norms. For instance, companies must avoid engaging in practices such as fraud, exploitation, or environmental degradation, which can tarnish their reputation and lead to severe consequences.To illustrate this point, consider a scenario where a company decides to cut costs by sourcing materials from suppliers that violate labor laws. While this may initially boost profits, it ultimately jeopardizes the company's integrity and public image. By failing to apportion forbidden from enterprise, the organization risks facing backlash from consumers, legal repercussions, and loss of trust among stakeholders. Thus, adhering to ethical standards is not merely a moral obligation; it is also a strategic necessity for long-term success.Moreover, the concept of apportion forbidden from enterprise extends beyond mere compliance with laws. It encompasses a broader understanding of corporate social responsibility (CSR). Businesses are increasingly held accountable for their impact on society and the environment. Stakeholders, including customers, employees, and investors, expect companies to operate transparently and ethically. Therefore, organizations must actively engage in practices that promote sustainability and social equity, while simultaneously avoiding actions that could be deemed harmful or unjust.In recent years, we have witnessed a surge in consumer activism, where individuals actively seek to support brands that align with their values. This shift in consumer behavior underscores the importance of apportion forbidden from enterprise. Companies that fail to recognize and adapt to these changing expectations may find themselves at a competitive disadvantage. On the other hand, those that embrace ethical practices and demonstrate a commitment to social responsibility can foster loyalty and trust, leading to increased customer retention and brand advocacy.In conclusion, the phrase apportion forbidden from enterprise encapsulates a vital principle in modern business practices. It serves as a reminder that organizations must diligently separate unethical actions from their operational strategies. By doing so, they not only comply with legal requirements but also build a sustainable and reputable brand. As we move forward in an increasingly interconnected world, it is imperative for businesses to prioritize ethical considerations and strive for a balance between profitability and responsibility. Ultimately, the success of an enterprise hinges on its ability to navigate these complexities with integrity and foresight.

在当今快速发展的商业环境中，伦理实践的概念变得前所未有的重要。公司们不断在盈利和社会责任之间的复杂关系中航行。其中一个关键方面是理解短语将禁止的行为与企业活动分开，它强调了将不道德的行为与合法的商业操作区分开来的必要性。这个原则为那些希望在追求目标的同时保持诚信的组织提供了指导。当我们谈论将禁止的行为与企业活动分开时，我们指的是在商业领域中区分可接受和不可接受行为的必要性。它突出了确保企业所有活动都符合法律标准和伦理规范的重要性。例如，公司必须避免参与欺诈、剥削或环境破坏等行为，这些行为可能会损害其声誉并导致严重后果。为了说明这一点，考虑一个场景：一家公司决定通过从违反劳动法的供应商那里采购材料来削减成本。虽然这可能最初会提高利润，但最终却会危及公司的诚信和公众形象。通过未能将禁止的行为与企业活动分开，该组织面临消费者的反对、法律后果以及利益相关者之间信任的丧失。因此，遵守伦理标准不仅仅是一种道德义务；它也是长期成功的战略必要性。此外，将禁止的行为与企业活动分开的概念超越了法律合规的范畴。它包含了对企业社会责任（CSR）更广泛的理解。企业越来越多地被要求对其对社会和环境的影响负责。利益相关者，包括客户、员工和投资者，期望公司以透明和道德的方式运营。因此，组织必须积极参与促进可持续性和社会公平的实践，同时避免任何可能被视为有害或不公正的行为。近年来，我们见证了消费者行动主义的激增，个人积极寻求支持与他们价值观一致的品牌。这种消费者行为的转变凸显了将禁止的行为与企业活动分开的重要性。未能认识到并适应这些变化期望的公司可能会发现自己在竞争中处于劣势。另一方面，那些拥抱伦理实践并表现出对社会责任承诺的公司可以培养忠诚度和信任，从而带来客户保留率和品牌倡导的增加。总之，短语将禁止的行为与企业活动分开概括了现代商业实践中的一个重要原则。它提醒组织必须认真区分不道德行为与其运营策略。通过这样做，他们不仅遵守法律要求，还建立了一个可持续和声誉良好的品牌。在我们在一个日益互联的世界中向前迈进时，企业必须优先考虑伦理考虑，并努力在盈利能力和责任之间取得平衡。最终，一个企业的成功取决于其以诚信和远见来应对这些复杂性的能力。