interdict trade with a foreign nation

简明释义

禁止同外国贸易

英英释义

例句

1.The government decided to interdict trade with a foreign nation due to national security concerns.

由于国家安全问题，政府决定禁止与外国进行贸易。

2.The new policy will interdict trade with a foreign nation that supports terrorism.

新政策将禁止与支持恐怖主义的外国进行贸易。

3.To protect local industries, the government may interdict trade with a foreign nation that dumps products at low prices.

为了保护本地产业，政府可能会禁止与以低价倾销产品的外国进行贸易。

4.In response to the sanctions, they had no choice but to interdict trade with a foreign nation that was violating international laws.

为了应对制裁，他们别无选择，只能禁止与违反国际法的外国进行贸易。

5.After the diplomatic crisis, the president announced plans to interdict trade with a foreign nation involved in espionage.

在外交危机后，总统宣布计划禁止与涉及间谍活动的外国进行贸易。

作文

In the realm of international relations, the term interdict trade with a foreign nation refers to the act of prohibiting commerce and economic exchanges with another country. This action is often taken by governments as a means of enforcing sanctions or responding to aggressive actions by foreign states. The implications of such a decision can be profound, affecting not only the nations involved but also the global economy as a whole. For instance, when a country decides to interdict trade with a foreign nation, it may do so in response to human rights violations, military aggression, or other actions deemed unacceptable by the international community.When a government chooses to interdict trade with a foreign nation, it usually aims to exert pressure on that nation to change its policies or behavior. This strategy can take various forms, including tariffs, embargoes, or outright bans on specific goods and services. The effectiveness of these measures can vary significantly, depending on the economic interdependence between the two countries. In some cases, the targeted nation may suffer economically, leading to internal unrest or changes in leadership. In other situations, however, the nation may find alternative trading partners or develop self-sufficient industries, thereby mitigating the impact of the interdiction.The decision to interdict trade with a foreign nation is rarely made lightly. It often involves extensive diplomatic discussions and considerations of potential repercussions. For example, allies of the nation being sanctioned may express concern about the humanitarian impact of such measures, particularly if they lead to shortages of essential goods. Additionally, there may be fears that such actions could escalate tensions and lead to conflict. Therefore, policymakers must carefully weigh the intended benefits against the possible negative outcomes.Historically, instances of trade interdiction have had significant consequences. The United States, for example, has employed trade interdictions against various nations throughout its history, including Cuba, Iran, and North Korea. These actions were often justified on the grounds of national security or moral imperatives. However, critics argue that such measures can harm ordinary citizens more than the political elite, leading to widespread suffering without achieving the desired political changes.Moreover, the rise of globalization has complicated the landscape of international trade. With economies becoming increasingly interconnected, the decision to interdict trade with a foreign nation can have ripple effects far beyond the immediate parties involved. Supply chains that span multiple countries can be disrupted, leading to increased prices and shortages in unrelated markets. This interconnectedness raises ethical questions about the efficacy and morality of trade interdictions, as the consequences are often felt by innocent civilians rather than the policymakers they aim to influence.In conclusion, the phrase interdict trade with a foreign nation encapsulates a complex and often contentious aspect of international relations. While it may serve as a tool for enforcing compliance with international norms and standards, the broader implications of such actions must be considered. The balance between national interests and global responsibilities remains a delicate one, and the consequences of trade interdiction can resonate throughout the world, impacting lives and economies in unforeseen ways.

在国际关系领域，短语与外国禁止贸易指的是禁止与另一个国家进行商业和经济交流的行为。这种行为通常是由政府采取的，作为实施制裁或回应外国国家侵略行为的一种手段。这种决策的影响可能深远，不仅影响相关国家，还对全球经济产生重大影响。例如，当一个国家决定与外国禁止贸易时，往往是为了回应人权侵犯、军事侵略或其他被国际社会视为不可接受的行为。当一个政府选择与外国禁止贸易时，通常旨在对该国施加压力，以促使其改变政策或行为。这种策略可以采取多种形式，包括关税、禁运或对特定商品和服务的全面禁令。这些措施的有效性因两国之间的经济相互依赖程度而异。在某些情况下，被制裁的国家可能会遭受经济损失，导致内部动荡或领导层更替。然而，在其他情况下，该国可能会找到替代贸易伙伴或发展自给自足的产业，从而减轻禁令的影响。决定与外国禁止贸易的过程往往不是轻率的。它通常涉及广泛的外交讨论和对潜在后果的考虑。例如，被制裁国家的盟友可能会对此类措施的人道影响表示担忧，特别是如果这些措施导致基本商品短缺。此外，还可能担心此类行动会加剧紧张局势并导致冲突。因此，政策制定者必须仔细权衡预期的好处与可能的负面结果。历史上，贸易禁令的实例具有重要的后果。例如，美国在历史上对古巴、伊朗和北朝鲜等多个国家实施了贸易禁令。这些措施通常以国家安全或道德责任为理由。然而，批评者认为，这种措施可能对普通公民造成伤害，而不是政治精英，导致广泛的痛苦而未能实现所期望的政治变革。此外，全球化的兴起使国际贸易的格局变得复杂。随着经济日益相互联系，决定与外国禁止贸易可能会产生超出直接相关方的连锁反应。跨越多个国家的供应链可能会受到干扰，导致价格上涨和无关市场的短缺。这种相互联系引发了关于贸易禁令的有效性和道德性的伦理问题，因为后果往往由无辜的平民承担，而不是那些他们试图影响的决策者。总之，短语与外国禁止贸易概括了国际关系中一个复杂且常常有争议的方面。虽然它可能作为强制遵守国际规范和标准的工具，但必须考虑此类行动的更广泛影响。国家利益与全球责任之间的平衡依然微妙，贸易禁令的后果可能在全球范围内产生共鸣，对人们的生活和经济产生意想不到的影响。