prohibitive subsidies

简明释义

禁止使用的补贴,禁止性补贴

英英释义

例句

1.Many farmers rely on prohibitive subsidies to keep their production costs manageable.

许多农民依赖于禁止性补贴来保持他们的生产成本在可控范围内。

2.The government implemented prohibitive subsidies to control the market prices of essential goods.

政府实施了禁止性补贴以控制基本商品的市场价格。

3.Without prohibitive subsidies, small businesses would struggle to survive against larger corporations.

如果没有禁止性补贴，小企业将难以在大型公司面前生存。

4.The introduction of prohibitive subsidies has led to a significant increase in local production.

引入禁止性补贴导致当地生产显著增加。

5.Critics argue that prohibitive subsidies can distort competition in the agricultural sector.

批评者认为，禁止性补贴可能扭曲农业部门的竞争。

作文

In recent years, the concept of subsidies has gained significant attention in economic discussions. While subsidies can be beneficial in promoting certain industries or helping low-income individuals, there exists a category known as prohibitive subsidies that can have detrimental effects on both the economy and society. To understand this term better, we must first explore what subsidies are and how they function. Subsidies are financial aids provided by the government to support businesses, reduce the cost of goods, or encourage specific economic activities. They can take various forms, such as direct cash payments, tax breaks, or price controls. However, when these subsidies become excessively high or are directed towards industries that do not contribute positively to the economy, they can be labeled as prohibitive subsidies (禁止性补贴). The term prohibitive subsidies refers to financial assistance that is so substantial that it creates barriers for new entrants into the market or leads to market distortions. For instance, if a government provides large subsidies to a particular industry, it may discourage competition by making it impossible for smaller companies to survive. This can lead to monopolistic practices, where a few large firms dominate the market, ultimately harming consumers through higher prices and reduced choices. Furthermore, prohibitive subsidies can also result in inefficient resource allocation. When funds are diverted to support failing industries or sectors that do not innovate, it stifles economic growth. Resources could be better utilized in more productive areas, leading to technological advancements and job creation. Instead, these subsidies can trap economies in a cycle of dependency on government support, preventing necessary reforms and innovation. One notable example of prohibitive subsidies can be seen in the fossil fuel industry. Many governments around the world provide significant financial support to oil and gas companies, which can lead to environmental degradation and hinder the transition to renewable energy sources. These subsidies create an unfair advantage for fossil fuel companies over cleaner alternatives, thus prolonging reliance on non-renewable energy and exacerbating climate change. Moreover, the implications of prohibitive subsidies extend beyond economics; they can also affect social equity. By favoring certain industries or companies, these subsidies can widen the gap between the wealthy and the poor. For instance, if large agribusinesses receive extensive subsidies while small farmers struggle to compete, it can lead to a concentration of wealth and power in the hands of a few, undermining the principles of fair competition and social justice. To mitigate the negative impacts of prohibitive subsidies, policymakers must carefully assess subsidy programs and consider alternatives that promote sustainable growth. This includes investing in education, infrastructure, and research and development, which can create a more level playing field for all businesses. Additionally, transitioning away from harmful subsidies towards those that support innovation and sustainability can help foster a more resilient economy. In conclusion, while subsidies can serve important purposes, prohibitive subsidies (禁止性补贴) pose significant challenges that can hinder competition, distort markets, and exacerbate social inequalities. A reevaluation of subsidy policies is crucial to ensure that they promote economic growth and social equity rather than creating barriers and inefficiencies. By doing so, we can pave the way for a more sustainable and equitable future.

近年来，补贴的概念在经济讨论中引起了广泛关注。虽然补贴可以在促进某些行业或帮助低收入人群方面发挥积极作用，但存在一种被称为禁止性补贴的类别，这可能对经济和社会产生不利影响。要更好地理解这个术语，我们必须首先探讨补贴是什么以及它们是如何运作的。补贴是政府提供的财政援助，用于支持企业、降低商品成本或鼓励特定经济活动。它们可以采取多种形式，例如直接现金支付、税收减免或价格控制。然而，当这些补贴过高或针对对经济没有积极贡献的行业时，就可以被标记为禁止性补贴（禁止性补贴）。禁止性补贴一词指的是财政援助程度如此之高，以至于为新市场参与者创造了障碍或导致市场扭曲。例如，如果政府向某个特定行业提供大量补贴，可能会通过使小公司无法生存来抑制竞争。这可能导致垄断行为，少数大型公司主导市场，最终通过提高价格和减少选择来伤害消费者。此外，禁止性补贴还可能导致资源配置效率低下。当资金被转移到支持失败的行业或不创新的部门时，会阻碍经济增长。资源本可以更好地用于更具生产力的领域，从而促进技术进步和创造就业机会。相反，这些补贴可能使经济陷入对政府支持的依赖循环，阻碍必要的改革和创新。一个显著的禁止性补贴例子可以在化石燃料行业中看到。世界各地许多政府为石油和天然气公司提供大量财政支持，这可能导致环境恶化并阻碍向可再生能源的过渡。这些补贴为化石燃料公司相对于清洁替代品创造了不公平的优势，从而延长了对非可再生能源的依赖，加剧了气候变化。此外，禁止性补贴的影响不仅限于经济；它们还可能影响社会公平。通过偏袒某些行业或公司，这些补贴可能加大富人与穷人之间的差距。例如，如果大型农业企业获得广泛的补贴，而小农户在竞争中苦苦挣扎，这可能导致财富和权力集中在少数人手中，破坏公平竞争和社会公正的原则。为了减轻禁止性补贴的负面影响，政策制定者必须仔细评估补贴项目，并考虑促进可持续增长的替代方案。这包括投资教育、基础设施和研发，这可以为所有企业创造一个更公平的竞争环境。此外，逐步淘汰有害补贴，转向支持创新和可持续发展的补贴，有助于培育更具韧性的经济。总之，虽然补贴可以发挥重要作用，但禁止性补贴（禁止性补贴）带来了显著挑战，这可能阻碍竞争、扭曲市场并加剧社会不平等。重新评估补贴政策对于确保它们促进经济增长和社会公平至关重要，而不是创造障碍和低效率。通过这样做，我们可以为更可持续和公平的未来铺平道路。