consequential loss; consequential damages

简明释义

间接损失

英英释义

例句

1.After the software failure, the firm sought compensation for consequential damages 间接损失 caused by the downtime.

在软件故障后，该公司寻求因停机造成的间接损失 consequential damages 的赔偿。

2.The court ruled that the plaintiff could not claim consequential losses 间接损失 because they were not foreseeable at the time of the contract.

法院裁定原告不能索赔间接损失 consequential losses，因为在合同签订时这些损失并不可预见。

3.The insurance policy covers direct damages but excludes consequential losses 间接损失 such as lost profits.

该保险政策涵盖直接损失，但不包括如利润损失等间接损失 consequential losses。

4.In the contract, it clearly states that neither party will be responsible for any consequential loss 间接损失 resulting from the breach.

在合同中明确规定，任何一方都不对因违约而产生的间接损失 consequential loss 负责。

5.The company was held liable for the consequential damages 间接损失 incurred by the client due to a delayed shipment.

由于货物延迟发货，公司被判对客户所产生的间接损失 consequential damages 承担责任。

作文

In the world of business and contracts, understanding legal terminology is crucial for navigating potential disputes. One such term that often arises in contractual agreements is consequential loss; consequential damages. These terms refer to losses or damages that do not flow directly from an act, but rather as a secondary result of that act. To illustrate this concept, let’s consider a scenario involving a software company and its client. Suppose the software company fails to deliver a critical update on time, which subsequently causes the client to miss a major deadline. The direct loss, in this case, might be the payment the client was supposed to make for the software update. However, the consequential loss; consequential damages could include lost profits from missed business opportunities, reputational damage, or even penalties imposed by the client's own clients due to the delay.Understanding consequential loss; consequential damages is essential for both parties in a contract. For the party providing a service or product, it is important to limit liability for these types of damages in their contracts. This can be done through specific clauses that state they are not responsible for any indirect losses that may arise from their failure to perform. On the other hand, the party receiving the service or product must be aware of these limitations when entering into an agreement. They should negotiate terms that adequately protect them against significant financial losses that could arise from consequential loss; consequential damages.Another key aspect to consider is the difference between consequential loss; consequential damages and direct losses. Direct losses are those that are immediately attributable to a breach of contract, while consequential loss; consequential damages are more remote and often require a chain of events to occur. This distinction is critical in legal contexts, as it can significantly affect the outcome of a dispute. Courts often look at the foreseeability of the damages when determining whether they are consequential. If the damages were not foreseeable at the time the contract was made, a court may decide not to award them.In conclusion, the terms consequential loss; consequential damages represent a complex area of contract law that requires careful consideration. Both parties in a contract must understand these terms to protect their interests and mitigate risks. By clearly defining the scope of liability and being aware of the potential for indirect losses, businesses can better navigate their contractual relationships and avoid costly disputes. Ultimately, knowledge of consequential loss; consequential damages empowers parties to make informed decisions and fosters healthier business interactions.

在商业和合同的世界中，理解法律术语对于应对潜在争议至关重要。其中一个在合同协议中经常出现的术语是间接损失；间接损害赔偿。这些术语指的是不直接源于某一行为的损失或损害，而是作为该行为的次要结果而产生。为了说明这一概念，让我们考虑一个涉及软件公司及其客户的场景。假设软件公司未能按时交付关键更新，这随后导致客户错过了一个重大截止日期。在这种情况下，直接损失可能是客户本应支付的软件更新费用。然而，间接损失；间接损害赔偿可能包括因错失商机而导致的利润损失、名誉损害，甚至由于延误而向客户施加的罚款。理解间接损失；间接损害赔偿对于合同中的双方都是至关重要的。对于提供服务或产品的一方来说，限制对这些类型损害的责任在合同中是很重要的。这可以通过特定条款来实现，声明他们不对因未能履行而可能产生的任何间接损失负责。另一方面，接受服务或产品的一方在签订合同时必须意识到这些限制。他们应协商出足够保护自己免受可能因间接损失；间接损害赔偿而造成的重大财务损失的条款。另一个需要考虑的关键方面是间接损失；间接损害赔偿与直接损失之间的区别。直接损失是那些可立即归因于合同违约的损失，而间接损失；间接损害赔偿则更为遥远，通常需要一系列事件的发生。这个区别在法律背景中至关重要，因为它可能显著影响争议的结果。法院通常在确定损害是否为间接损失时会考虑损害的可预见性。如果在合同签订时这些损害不是可预见的，法院可能会决定不予赔偿。总之，间接损失；间接损害赔偿这两个术语代表了合同法的一个复杂领域，需要仔细考虑。合同中的双方必须理解这些术语，以保护他们的利益并减轻风险。通过明确定义责任范围并意识到间接损失的潜在性，企业可以更好地应对其合同关系并避免昂贵的争议。最终，对间接损失；间接损害赔偿的了解使各方能够做出明智的决策，并促进更健康的商业互动。