indirect review

简明释义

间接检查

英英释义

例句

1.An indirect review can provide insights that direct feedback might miss.

一项间接评审可以提供直接反馈可能遗漏的见解。

2.During the meeting, we conducted an indirect review of the project's progress by discussing team feedback.

在会议中，我们通过讨论团队反馈进行了项目进展的间接评审。

3.We gathered data from customer surveys as part of our indirect review process.

我们从客户调查中收集数据，作为我们的间接评审过程的一部分。

4.The manager prefers an indirect review method to avoid confrontation with employees.

经理更喜欢使用间接评审的方法，以避免与员工的对抗。

5.The annual performance assessment included an indirect review of peer evaluations.

年度绩效评估包括对同事评估的间接评审。

作文

In the realm of literature and academic writing, various methods of assessment and critique are employed to evaluate a piece of work. One such method is the indirect review, which refers to an evaluation that does not directly assess the content or quality of the work itself but instead focuses on its impact, reception, or context within a broader framework. This approach can be particularly beneficial in understanding how a piece of writing resonates with its audience and its place in the larger discourse. For instance, when a novel is published, critics may not only focus on the narrative structure, character development, or thematic elements but also examine how it reflects societal issues, influences other works, or engages with contemporary cultural conversations. This kind of analysis allows readers and scholars to appreciate the work beyond its immediate artistic merits, providing a richer understanding of its significance.The indirect review process often involves looking at reader responses, sales figures, or even social media discussions surrounding the work. By analyzing these external factors, one can glean insights into the work's effectiveness and relevance. For example, a book that sparks widespread discussion on platforms like Twitter or Goodreads may indicate that it has struck a chord with readers, prompting them to engage with its themes or characters in meaningful ways.Moreover, the indirect review can serve as a tool for authors to refine their craft. By observing how their work is received and interpreted by different audiences, writers can gain valuable feedback that may inform their future projects. This feedback loop creates a dynamic relationship between authors and readers, fostering a community of dialogue and reflection.In academic settings, the indirect review can also play a crucial role in evaluating research papers or dissertations. Instead of merely assessing the methodology and findings, committees may consider how the research contributes to existing literature, its implications for future studies, and its overall impact on the field. This comprehensive approach ensures that evaluations are not just about the technical aspects of the work but also about its broader contributions to knowledge and society.However, while the indirect review offers valuable perspectives, it is essential to balance it with direct assessments. A thorough critique should encompass both the intrinsic qualities of the work and its extrinsic influences. This holistic approach allows for a more nuanced understanding of any literary or academic piece, ensuring that all dimensions are considered.In conclusion, the indirect review is a multifaceted evaluation method that enriches our understanding of literature and academic writing. By focusing on the impact and context of a work rather than solely its content, we can appreciate its significance in a broader sense. This approach not only benefits critics and scholars but also provides authors with crucial insights that can enhance their future endeavors. As we continue to explore the complexities of writing and its reception, the indirect review will undoubtedly remain an essential component of literary and academic discourse.

在文学和学术写作的领域中，评估和批评作品的方法多种多样。其中一种方法是间接审查，它指的是一种评估方式，不直接评估作品的内容或质量，而是关注其影响、接受度或在更广泛框架中的背景。这种方法在理解一部作品如何与观众产生共鸣及其在更大话语中的位置时特别有益。例如，当一本小说出版时，评论家不仅可能专注于叙事结构、角色发展或主题元素，还会考察它如何反映社会问题、影响其他作品或参与当代文化对话。这种分析方式使读者和学者能够超越作品的直接艺术价值，提供对其重要性的更深刻理解。间接审查过程通常涉及观察读者反应、销售数据，甚至社交媒体上围绕该作品的讨论。通过分析这些外部因素，人们可以洞察作品的有效性和相关性。例如，一本在Twitter或Goodreads等平台上引发广泛讨论的书籍，可能表明它与读者产生了共鸣，促使他们以有意义的方式参与其主题或角色。此外，间接审查还可以作为作者完善自己创作的一种工具。通过观察他们的作品如何被不同的观众接受和解读，作家可以获得宝贵的反馈，这些反馈可能会影响他们未来的项目。这种反馈循环在作者与读者之间创造了动态关系，促进了对话和反思的社区。在学术环境中，间接审查也在评估研究论文或学位论文方面发挥着至关重要的作用。评审委员会不仅仅评估研究方法和结果，还可能考虑研究对现有文献的贡献、对未来研究的影响及其对该领域的整体影响。这种全面的方法确保评估不仅仅关注作品的技术方面，还关注其对知识和社会的更广泛贡献。然而，尽管间接审查提供了宝贵的视角，但平衡直接评估也是至关重要的。全面的批评应该涵盖作品的内在品质以及其外在影响。这种整体方法使我们能够对任何文学或学术作品有更细致的理解，确保所有维度都得到考虑。总之，间接审查是一种多面的评估方法，丰富了我们对文学和学术写作的理解。通过关注作品的影响和背景，而不仅仅是其内容，我们可以更好地欣赏其在更广泛意义上的重要性。这种方法不仅有利于评论家和学者，也为作者提供了关键的见解，从而提升他们未来的努力。在我们继续探索写作及其接受的复杂性时，间接审查无疑将继续成为文学和学术话语的重要组成部分。