reactionism
简明释义
n. 极端保守主义;反动思想
英英释义
A political or social philosophy that seeks to return to a previous state of society, often in opposition to progressive change. | 一种政治或社会哲学,旨在恢复社会的先前状态,通常反对进步变革。 |
单词用法
政治反动主义 | |
文化反动主义 | |
反动运动 | |
对现代性的反动主义 | |
社会中的反动主义 | |
反动主义与保守主义 |
同义词
反义词
进步主义 | 进步主义倡导社会改革和创新。 | ||
自由主义 | 自由主义强调个人权利和自由。 |
例句
1.This paper not only dose affirms instructive and positive effect of his thoughts but also criticizes history reactionism in his thought .
既肯定了其积极的启示作用,又批评了他的历史复古主义思想。
2.This paper not only dose affirms instructive and positive effect of his thoughts but also criticizes history reactionism in his thought .
既肯定了其积极的启示作用,又批评了他的历史复古主义思想。
3.The rise of reactionism in politics often leads to a backlash against progressive reforms.
政治中反动主义的崛起往往导致对进步改革的反弹。
4.Critics of reactionism argue that it hinders progress and promotes intolerance.
批评反动主义的人认为它阻碍了进步并促进了不宽容。
5.Many argue that the current climate of reactionism is stifling innovation and creativity.
许多人认为,当前的反动主义气候正在压制创新和创造力。
6.The reactionism seen in some communities is often a response to rapid changes in society.
某些社区中看到的反动主义通常是对社会快速变化的反应。
7.In times of social upheaval, reactionism can emerge as a way for people to cling to traditional values.
在社会动荡时期,反动主义可能会作为人们坚持传统价值观的一种方式出现。
作文
In today's rapidly changing world, the concept of reactionism (反动主义) is becoming increasingly relevant. This term refers to a political and social ideology that seeks to resist or reverse progress, often by advocating for a return to traditional values or systems. While some may view reactionism as a necessary response to modern challenges, it is essential to examine its implications on society and governance. Historically, reactionism has emerged in various forms, often in reaction to significant social changes or upheavals. For instance, during the Industrial Revolution, many individuals felt threatened by the rapid advancements in technology and the accompanying shifts in labor dynamics. In response, they rallied behind reactionism, promoting a return to agrarian lifestyles and traditional craftsmanship. This movement was characterized by a longing for a perceived simpler time, where community bonds were stronger and societal roles were clearly defined.In contemporary society, we witness similar trends where reactionism manifests in various political movements. These movements often gain traction during times of economic uncertainty or cultural shifts. For example, the rise of populist leaders around the globe can be seen as a form of reactionism. These leaders capitalize on the fears and frustrations of the populace, promising to restore lost glory and protect traditional values against perceived threats from globalization and immigration. However, the allure of reactionism comes with significant risks. While it may provide a sense of comfort and security to those who feel left behind by progress, it can also lead to division and conflict within society. The emphasis on returning to past ideals often ignores the complexities and realities of today's world. Furthermore, reactionism can stifle innovation and prevent societies from addressing pressing issues such as climate change, inequality, and technological disruption. Critics argue that reactionism represents a refusal to engage with the future, preferring instead to cling to outdated paradigms. This perspective suggests that rather than resisting change, societies should embrace it, adapting and evolving in response to new challenges. By fostering a culture of innovation and inclusivity, communities can create solutions that honor their histories while also paving the way for a more equitable future. In conclusion, while reactionism (反动主义) may arise as a natural response to the uncertainties of modern life, it is crucial to approach it with caution. Understanding the historical context and motivations behind reactionism allows us to engage in meaningful dialogue about our values and aspirations. Ultimately, the challenge lies in finding a balance between honoring tradition and embracing progress, ensuring that we do not lose sight of the potential for a better tomorrow. As we navigate these complex dynamics, it is essential to remain open-minded and willing to adapt, lest we become trapped in the confines of reactionism.