prices set uniformly by the state

简明释义

国家规定统一价格

英英释义

例句

1.The government announced that prices set uniformly by the state would help stabilize the market during economic turmoil.

政府宣布，由国家统一设定的价格将有助于在经济动荡期间稳定市场。

2.In some countries, essential services like healthcare have prices set uniformly by the state to ensure accessibility for all citizens.

在一些国家，像医疗保健这样的基本服务有由国家统一设定的价格，以确保所有公民都能获得服务。

3.In a socialist economy, all goods have prices set uniformly by the state, ensuring that everyone can afford basic necessities.

在社会主义经济中，所有商品都有由国家统一设定的价格，确保每个人都能负担得起基本生活必需品。

4.Farmers are required to sell their produce at prices set uniformly by the state to prevent exploitation.

农民被要求以由国家统一设定的价格出售他们的农产品，以防止剥削。

5.Critics argue that prices set uniformly by the state can lead to shortages and inefficiencies in the economy.

批评者认为，由国家统一设定的价格可能导致经济中的短缺和低效。

作文

In many economies around the world, the role of the state in regulating market prices is a topic of considerable debate. One concept that often arises in discussions about economic policy is the idea of prices set uniformly by the state. This phrase refers to a situation where the government establishes a fixed price for goods and services, rather than allowing the market to dictate these prices through supply and demand dynamics. Understanding this concept requires an exploration of its implications, advantages, and disadvantages.Firstly, prices set uniformly by the state aim to create stability within the economy. By controlling prices, the government can prevent extreme fluctuations that might arise from market forces. For instance, during times of crisis or natural disasters, essential goods such as food and medicine can become excessively expensive if left to market forces. In such cases, uniform pricing can ensure that all citizens have access to necessary products without facing financial ruin.Moreover, when the state sets prices uniformly, it can also be a tool for social equity. By controlling prices, the government can make sure that lower-income individuals can afford basic necessities. This approach is often seen in socialist or mixed economies where the government prioritizes welfare over profit maximization. For example, in some countries, the government may subsidize essential goods, leading to lower prices that benefit the entire population.However, there are significant downsides to prices set uniformly by the state. One of the primary criticisms is that it can lead to inefficiencies in the market. When prices do not reflect the true cost of production, it can result in shortages or surpluses. Producers may not have the incentive to create more goods if they cannot charge a price that reflects their costs and desired profits. Consequently, this could lead to a decline in the quality of goods and services available in the market.Additionally, when the government intervenes to set prices, it can create a black market for goods. If prices are too low, suppliers may choose to sell their products illegally at higher prices. This not only undermines the government's intentions but can also lead to a loss of tax revenue and increased crime rates.Furthermore, prices set uniformly by the state can stifle innovation. When companies know that they cannot set their own prices, they may lack the motivation to invest in research and development. This can hinder technological advancements and overall economic growth. In contrast, in a free-market system, competition drives innovation as companies strive to offer better products at competitive prices.In conclusion, while prices set uniformly by the state can provide short-term benefits such as price stability and social equity, they also come with significant risks. The potential for market inefficiencies, black markets, and reduced innovation cannot be overlooked. As such, policymakers must carefully consider the ramifications of price controls and seek a balanced approach that promotes both economic stability and growth. Ultimately, the challenge lies in finding a way to protect consumers without compromising the efficiency and dynamism of the market economy.

在世界各地的许多经济体中，国家在调节市场价格方面的作用是一个备受争议的话题。一个常常出现在经济政策讨论中的概念是由国家统一设定的价格。这个短语指的是政府为商品和服务设定固定价格，而不是让市场通过供求动态来决定这些价格。理解这一概念需要探讨其影响、优点和缺点。首先，由国家统一设定的价格旨在创造经济稳定。通过控制价格，政府可以防止因市场力量导致的极端波动。例如，在危机或自然灾害时期，如果任由市场力量，食品和药品等基本商品可能会变得过于昂贵。在这种情况下，统一定价可以确保所有公民都能在不面临财务崩溃的情况下获得必要的产品。此外，当国家统一设定价格时，它也可以成为社会公平的工具。通过控制价格，政府可以确保低收入个人能够负担得起基本生活必需品。这种方法通常在社会主义或混合经济中看到，在这些经济中，政府优先考虑福利而非利润最大化。例如，在一些国家，政府可能会对基本商品提供补贴，从而导致价格降低，使整个社会受益。然而，由国家统一设定的价格存在显著的缺点。主要的批评之一是它可能导致市场中的低效。当价格未能反映生产的真实成本时，可能会导致短缺或过剩。如果生产者无法收取反映其成本和期望利润的价格，他们可能没有动力去生产更多商品。因此，这可能导致市场上可用商品和服务的质量下降。此外，当政府干预设定价格时，可能会导致商品的黑市。如果价格过低，供应商可能会选择在黑市上以更高的价格出售他们的产品。这不仅破坏了政府的意图，还可能导致税收收入的损失和犯罪率的上升。此外，由国家统一设定的价格可能会抑制创新。当公司知道他们不能自行设定价格时，他们可能缺乏投资于研发的动力。这可能阻碍技术进步和整体经济增长。相比之下，在自由市场系统中，竞争推动创新，因为公司努力提供更好的产品并以有竞争力的价格出售。总之，虽然由国家统一设定的价格可以提供短期利益，例如价格稳定和社会公平，但它们也伴随着重大风险。市场低效、黑市和创新减少的潜在可能性不容忽视。因此，政策制定者必须仔细考虑价格管制的后果，并寻求一种促进经济稳定与增长的平衡方法。最终，挑战在于找到一种保护消费者而又不妨碍市场经济效率和活力的方法。