justifier
简明释义
英[ˈdʒʌstɪˌfaɪə(r)]美[ˈdʒʌstəˌfaɪər]
n. 辩护者;辩解者;证明者;整版工人
英英释义
A justifier is a person or thing that provides justification or reasons for something. | 一个justifier是指提供某事理由或辩护的人或事物。 |
单词用法
道德辩护者 | |
法律辩护者 | |
行为的辩护者 | |
决策的辩护者 |
同义词
辩护者 | 在辩论中,他作为该政策的辩护者。 | ||
辩解者 | 律师为他的客户辩解。 | ||
辩护者 | 她因对争议问题的辩护而闻名。 | ||
合理化者 | 他试图用各种借口来合理化他的决定。 |
反义词
谴责者 | The condemner of the policy argued that it was harmful to society. | 该政策的谴责者认为它对社会有害。 | |
批评者 | As a critic, she often points out the flaws in popular opinions. | 作为一名批评者,她经常指出流行观点中的缺陷。 |
例句
1.God is just and the justifier (gracious).
神是称义的神﹕这是祂的恩典。
2.God is just and the justifier (gracious).
神是称义的神﹕这是祂的恩典。
3.God is justifier: that is grace.
上帝是称义的神﹕这是祂的恩典。
4.His role as a justifier was crucial in helping the team understand the project's goals.
他作为解释者的角色对帮助团队理解项目目标至关重要。
5.The teacher served as a justifier for the new curriculum changes during the meeting.
老师在会议上作为新课程变更的辩护者。
6.In the debate, she presented herself as a justifier of her controversial opinions.
在辩论中,她将自己视为其争议观点的辩护者。
7.The lawyer acted as a justifier for his client, proving their innocence in court.
律师作为其客户的辩护者,在法庭上证明了他们的清白。
8.She became the justifier of the company's policies, advocating for their benefits.
她成为公司政策的辩护者,倡导其好处。
作文
In today's complex world, the concept of a justifier is increasingly relevant. A justifier is someone or something that provides justification or rationalization for actions, beliefs, or decisions. This role can be seen in various contexts, including personal relationships, ethical dilemmas, and even in political discourse. Understanding the role of a justifier can help us navigate these complexities more effectively.For instance, in personal relationships, individuals often find themselves needing a justifier for their feelings or actions. When conflicts arise, people may seek reasons to validate their emotions or behaviors. For example, if one partner feels neglected, they might justify their decision to spend time with friends as a way to cope. Here, the justifier serves to ease guilt or provide a rationale for actions that might otherwise be viewed negatively.In a broader context, the role of a justifier becomes even more pronounced in ethical discussions. Take the issue of environmental conservation, for example. Advocates for sustainable practices often act as justifiers for changes in policy or individual behavior. They present arguments that highlight the importance of protecting our planet, thereby justifying actions such as reducing waste or investing in renewable energy sources. Their role is crucial in persuading others to adopt practices that may initially seem inconvenient or unnecessary.Moreover, in political discourse, leaders frequently employ justifiers to support their policies. When a government decides to implement a new law or regulation, it often presents a series of justifications aimed at convincing the public of its necessity. These justifiers can range from economic benefits to moral imperatives, and their effectiveness often determines public support or opposition. For instance, a government might justify increased surveillance measures by citing national security concerns, framing the discussion in a way that seeks to alleviate fears about privacy violations.However, it's important to recognize that not all justifiers are created equal. Some may be grounded in truth and reason, while others can be misleading or manipulative. In this age of information overload, discerning the validity of a justifier becomes essential. Critical thinking skills play a vital role in evaluating the arguments presented by various justifiers. We must ask ourselves: Are these justifications based on facts? Do they consider multiple perspectives? Are they designed to serve a particular agenda?Ultimately, the search for justifiers is a fundamental aspect of human nature. We seek to make sense of our experiences and choices, often looking for ways to explain our actions to ourselves and others. By understanding the role of a justifier, we can become more aware of the narratives we construct and the motivations behind them. This awareness enables us to engage in more meaningful dialogues and fosters empathy in our interactions.In conclusion, whether in personal relationships, ethical discussions, or political arenas, justifiers play a significant role in shaping our understanding of the world. As we navigate the complexities of life, recognizing the presence and influence of justifiers can empower us to think critically and act responsibly. By doing so, we can strive for a more just and equitable society, where the reasons behind our actions are grounded in truth and integrity.
在当今复杂的世界中,justifier 的概念越来越相关。justifier 是指为行动、信仰或决策提供理由或合理化的人或事物。这个角色可以在各种背景中看到,包括个人关系、伦理困境,甚至政治话语。理解 justifier 的角色可以帮助我们更有效地应对这些复杂性。例如,在个人关系中,个体常常需要一个 justifier 来证明他们的感受或行为。当冲突出现时,人们可能会寻求理由来验证自己的情绪或行为。例如,如果一方感到被忽视,他们可能会为自己选择与朋友共度时光的决定辩解,作为一种应对方式。在这里,justifier 的作用是减轻内疚感或为可能被视为负面的行为提供理由。在更广泛的背景下,justifier 的角色在伦理讨论中变得更加明显。以环境保护问题为例。可持续实践的倡导者常常充当政策或个人行为变化的 justifier。他们提出论据,强调保护我们星球的重要性,从而为减少浪费或投资可再生能源提供合理化。他们的角色在说服他人采用最初看似不方便或不必要的做法时至关重要。此外,在政治话语中,领导者经常使用 justifiers 来支持他们的政策。当政府决定实施新法律或法规时,通常会提出一系列理由,旨在说服公众其必要性。这些 justifiers 可以从经济利益到道德责任,且它们的有效性往往决定了公众的支持或反对。例如,政府可能通过引用国家安全问题来为增加监控措施辩护,以一种试图减轻对隐私侵犯担忧的方式构建讨论。然而,重要的是要认识到并非所有的 justifiers 都是平等的。有些可能基于事实和理性,而其他一些可能具有误导性或操控性。在信息过载的时代,辨别 justifier 的有效性变得至关重要。批判性思维技能在评估各种 justifiers 提出的论点时发挥着重要作用。我们必须问自己:这些理由是否基于事实?它们是否考虑了多种观点?它们是否旨在服务于特定议程?最终,寻找 justifiers 是人类本性中的基本方面。我们寻求理解我们的经历和选择,常常寻找解释我们行为的方式。通过理解 justifier 的角色,我们可以更加意识到我们构建的叙述及其背后的动机。这种意识使我们能够进行更有意义的对话,并在互动中培养同理心。总之,无论是在个人关系、伦理讨论还是政治领域,justifiers 在塑造我们对世界的理解中扮演着重要角色。当我们应对生活的复杂性时,识别 justifiers 的存在和影响可以使我们具备批判性思维和负责任的行动能力。通过这样做,我们可以努力追求一个更公正和公平的社会,在这个社会中,我们行为背后的理由是基于真理和诚信的。