disputative

简明释义

英[dɪˈspjuːtətɪv]美[dɪˈspjʊtətɪv]

adj. 好争论的；爱争辩的；有关争论的

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.Men tend to be more disputative than women.

男人往往比女人好争论。

2.Men tend to be more disputative than women.

男人往往比女人好争论。

3.Her disputative style made her a formidable opponent in any debate.

她的争论性风格让她在任何辩论中都成为一个强大的对手。

4.The disputative comments in the article sparked a lot of discussion among readers.

文章中的争议性评论引发了读者之间的很多讨论。

5.The lawyer presented a very disputative argument that challenged the validity of the evidence.

律师提出了一个非常争议性的论点，质疑证据的有效性。

6.The professor encouraged disputative discussions to foster critical thinking in students.

教授鼓励进行争议性的讨论，以培养学生的批判性思维。

7.In the meeting, his disputative nature often led to heated debates.

在会议上，他的争辩性性格常常导致激烈的辩论。

作文

In today's world, where opinions often clash and debates become heated, the term disputative can be used to describe a variety of discussions that are characterized by disagreement and contention. The nature of these disputative dialogues is not merely to express differing views but to engage in a battle of wits, where each participant seeks to assert their perspective over the other. This phenomenon is particularly evident in political discussions, academic discourses, and even casual conversations among friends.To illustrate the essence of disputative conversations, let us consider a political debate. During an election season, candidates often engage in disputative exchanges, where they challenge each other's policies and character. These debates are designed not just to inform the public but to persuade them to align with one candidate's viewpoint over another. The disputative nature of such debates can lead to heightened emotions, as supporters rally behind their chosen candidate, often leading to polarized opinions within the community.Moreover, in academic settings, scholarly articles and research papers frequently present disputative arguments. Researchers aim to contribute to their field by challenging existing theories or presenting new evidence that contradicts previous findings. This disputative approach is vital for the advancement of knowledge, as it encourages critical thinking and rigorous analysis. For instance, a scientist may publish a paper that disputes long-held beliefs about climate change, sparking a wave of discussions and further investigations. Such disputative interactions are essential for scientific progress, as they foster a culture of questioning and reevaluation.However, it is important to recognize that not all disputative conversations lead to productive outcomes. When disagreements escalate into hostility, the original purpose of dialogue can be lost. In personal relationships, disputative arguments can result in misunderstandings and hurt feelings. It is crucial for individuals to navigate these discussions with care, aiming for constructive criticism rather than destructive conflict. Active listening and empathy can transform a potentially damaging disputative exchange into an opportunity for growth and understanding.In conclusion, the concept of disputative dialogue plays a significant role in various aspects of society. Whether in politics, academia, or personal relationships, the ability to engage in disputative discussions can lead to deeper insights and greater awareness of differing perspectives. However, it is essential to approach these conversations with respect and a willingness to listen. By doing so, we can ensure that our disputative exchanges contribute positively to our understanding of the world around us, rather than merely fueling division and conflict.

在当今世界，意见常常发生冲突，辩论变得激烈，术语disputative可以用来描述各种以争议和争执为特征的讨论。这些disputative对话的性质不仅仅是表达不同的观点，而是参与一场智力的较量，每个参与者都试图在对方之上主张自己的观点。这种现象在政治讨论、学术话语，甚至朋友间的随意对话中尤为明显。为了说明disputative对话的本质，让我们考虑一个政治辩论。在选举季节，候选人往往会进行disputative的交流，他们挑战彼此的政策和性格。这些辩论的目的不仅是为了告知公众，还为了说服他们支持某位候选人的观点。这样的disputative辩论可能导致情绪高涨，支持者们在各自的候选人身后集结，往往导致社区内部的意见极化。此外，在学术环境中，学术文章和研究论文经常呈现出disputative的论点。研究人员旨在通过挑战现有理论或提出与先前发现相矛盾的新证据来为他们的领域做出贡献。这种disputative的方法对知识的进步至关重要，因为它鼓励批判性思维和严谨分析。例如，一位科学家可能发表一篇论文，反驳长期以来对气候变化的信念，从而引发一波讨论和进一步的调查。这种disputative互动对于科学进展至关重要，因为它培养了质疑和重新评估的文化。然而，重要的是要认识到，并非所有的disputative对话都会导致富有成效的结果。当分歧升级为敌意时，原本的对话目的可能会丧失。在个人关系中，disputative争论可能导致误解和伤害感情。个人在这些讨论中谨慎行事至关重要，旨在进行建设性的批评，而不是破坏性的冲突。积极倾听和同理心可以将潜在的有害disputative交流转变为成长和理解的机会。总之，disputative对话的概念在社会的各个方面扮演着重要角色。无论是在政治、学术还是个人关系中，参与disputative讨论的能力都可以带来更深刻的见解和对不同观点的更大理解。然而，重要的是以尊重和愿意倾听的态度来对待这些对话。通过这样做，我们可以确保我们的disputative交流对我们理解周围世界产生积极影响，而不仅仅是助长分裂和冲突。