centralisation

简明释义

英[ˌsentrəlaɪˈzeɪʃən]美[ˌsentrəlɪˈzeʃən]

n. （英）集中化（等于 centralization）

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.In countries where schools mainly seek to teach pupils to read, write and grasp some basic maths, centralisation seems to work.

在有些国家，需要教小学生阅读，写字，基础数学的学校，统一教学更有效。

2.But the centralisation of so much data also has drawbacks, as this week's mess shows.

但是让如此多数据的集中同样有其不利之处，正如本周的这件糟糕的事所显示的。

3.In countries where schools mainly seek to teach pupils to read, write and grasp some basic maths, centralisation seems to work.

在有些国家，需要教小学生阅读，写字，基础数学的学校，统一教学更有效。

4.Today this centralisation is one of the biggest differences between California and other states.

今天，这种集中就是加州和其它的州区别最大的一个地方。

5.But what is most wrong with the British version of representative democracy is its extreme over-centralisation.

但是英国的代议制最大的错误的它的极端的过于中心化。

6.Put these into the context of centralisation and de-centralisation of business control and activities.

把这些变成集中的背景下和去集中化的业务控制和活动。

7.The centralisation 集中化 of data management can help in reducing redundancy.

数据管理的集中化可以帮助减少冗余。

8.The company decided on the centralisation 集中化 of its operations to improve efficiency.

公司决定将其运营进行集中化以提高效率。

9.In times of crisis, centralisation 集中化 allows for quicker responses and solutions.

在危机时期，集中化可以更快地响应和解决问题。

10.Many governments are moving towards centralisation 集中化 to streamline decision-making processes.

许多政府正在朝着集中化的方向发展，以简化决策过程。

11.The centralisation 集中化 of power can lead to more efficient governance but may also raise concerns about accountability.

权力的集中化可以导致更高效的治理，但也可能引发对问责制的担忧。

作文

In today's rapidly changing world, the concept of centralisation (集中化) plays a crucial role in the way organizations and governments operate. The term centralisation refers to the concentration of decision-making authority at a single point in an organization or system, allowing for streamlined processes and unified control. While centralisation can enhance efficiency and consistency, it also raises important questions about flexibility, responsiveness, and empowerment within various contexts.One of the primary advantages of centralisation is that it can lead to more efficient decision-making. When decisions are made by a central authority, there is often less ambiguity, as everyone understands who is responsible for making choices. This can be particularly beneficial in large organizations where diverse departments may have conflicting priorities. For example, in a multinational corporation, a centralised approach can ensure that all branches adhere to a cohesive strategy, reducing the risk of miscommunication and misalignment.Moreover, centralisation can foster consistency in policies and practices across an organization. By having a central governing body, companies can implement standardized procedures that apply uniformly to all employees. This uniformity can enhance brand identity and customer experience, as clients receive the same level of service regardless of location. For instance, global fast-food chains often rely on centralisation to maintain consistent quality and service standards across their franchises worldwide.However, while centralisation has its benefits, it is essential to consider its drawbacks. One significant concern is the potential for reduced flexibility. In a centralised structure, local managers may feel constrained by top-down directives that do not account for regional differences or specific market needs. This can lead to missed opportunities for innovation and adaptation. For instance, a company operating in diverse markets may struggle to respond quickly to local trends if all decisions must funnel through a central authority.Additionally, centralisation can create a disconnect between leadership and employees. When decision-making is concentrated at the top, lower-level staff may feel disempowered and disengaged. This lack of involvement can stifle creativity and initiative, as employees may be less likely to propose new ideas or solutions when they believe their voices are not heard. It is crucial for organizations to strike a balance between centralisation and decentralization to foster a culture of collaboration and innovation.In the realm of government, centralisation can similarly lead to both positive and negative outcomes. A centralised government can efficiently implement policies and allocate resources, especially in times of crisis. For example, during a national emergency, a centralised response may be necessary to ensure that aid and support reach affected areas quickly and effectively.Conversely, centralisation in government can also result in bureaucratic inefficiencies and a lack of responsiveness to local needs. Citizens may feel alienated from decision-making processes, leading to dissatisfaction and unrest. In democratic societies, it is vital for governments to remain accountable to their constituents and ensure that local voices are represented in policy-making.In conclusion, the concept of centralisation (集中化) is multifaceted, with both advantages and disadvantages. While it can lead to greater efficiency and consistency in decision-making, it is essential to recognize the potential downsides, such as reduced flexibility and employee disengagement. Organizations and governments must carefully evaluate their structures and processes to find the right balance between centralisation and decentralization, ensuring that they remain responsive to the needs of their stakeholders while maintaining effective control and direction.

在当今快速变化的世界中，centralisation（集中化）的概念在组织和政府的运作方式中发挥着至关重要的作用。centralisation一词指的是在组织或系统中将决策权集中于一个点，从而实现流程的简化和统一的控制。虽然centralisation可以提高效率和一致性，但它也引发了关于灵活性、响应能力和各个背景下授权的重要问题。centralisation的主要优点之一是它可以导致更高效的决策。当决策由中央权威做出时，往往会减少模糊性，因为每个人都理解谁负责做出选择。这在大型组织中特别有利，因为不同部门可能会有冲突的优先事项。例如，在跨国公司中，centralised方法可以确保所有分支机构遵循统一的战略，减少沟通和不对称的风险。此外，centralisation可以促进组织内部政策和实践的一致性。通过设立一个中央管理机构，公司可以实施适用于所有员工的标准化程序。这种统一性可以增强品牌形象和客户体验，因为客户无论在哪里都能获得相同水平的服务。例如，全球快餐连锁店通常依赖于centralisation来维持其特许经营店的质量和服务标准的一致性。然而，尽管centralisation有其好处，但必须考虑到其缺点。一个重要的担忧是可能导致灵活性降低。在centralised结构中，当地管理者可能会因自上而下的指令而感到受到限制，而这些指令并未考虑地区差异或特定市场需求。这可能导致错失创新和适应的机会。例如，一家在多元市场运营的公司如果所有决策都必须通过中央权威进行，可能会难以迅速响应本地趋势。此外，centralisation可能会导致领导层与员工之间的脱节。当决策集中在高层时，低级员工可能会感到无权和无动于衷。这种缺乏参与感可能会抑制创造力和主动性，因为员工在认为自己的声音没有被听到时，可能不太愿意提出新想法或解决方案。组织必须在centralisation和分散化之间找到平衡，以培养协作和创新的文化。在政府领域，centralisation同样可能导致积极和消极的结果。centralised政府可以有效地实施政策和分配资源，特别是在危机时期。例如，在国家紧急情况下，centralised响应可能是必要的，以确保援助和支持迅速有效地到达受影响地区。相反，政府中的centralisation也可能导致官僚低效和对地方需求的响应不足。公民可能会感到与决策过程脱节，导致不满和动荡。在民主社会中，政府必须对其选民保持问责，并确保地方声音在政策制定中得到体现。总之，centralisation（集中化）的概念是多面的，既有优点也有缺点。虽然它可以提高决策的效率和一致性，但必须认识到潜在的缺点，如灵活性降低和员工的无动于衷。组织和政府必须仔细评估其结构和流程，以找到centralisation和分散化之间的正确平衡，确保它们能够在保持有效控制和方向的同时，响应利益相关者的需求。