embargo

简明释义

英[ɪmˈbɑːɡəʊ]美[ɪmˈbɑːrɡoʊ]

n. 禁运，贸易禁运；禁令；封港令

v. 禁止……的贸易，禁运；下令封锁（消息），禁止出版；<旧>征用（船只，货物）

复 数 e m b a r g o e s

第 三 人 称 单 数 e m b a r g o e s

现 在 分 词 e m b a r g o i n g

过 去 式 e m b a r g o e d

过 去 分 词 e m b a r g o e d

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.Meanwhile I'd like to stress that the lifting of the arms embargo shall not be linked with any other issue.

同时我想强调，解除对华军售禁令不应同任何问题挂钩。

2.Some texts of other speeches, statements and other materials will be issued under embargo.

其它发言稿、声明和其它材料的有些文本将在要求禁止发布的情况下提供。

3.Has China worked out a embargo list on luxury goods?

中方是否确定了禁运奢侈品清单？

4.Advance texts: materials under embargo.

提前提供的文本：禁止发布的材料。

5.The American economic embargo is still there, too.

除此之外，还有美国的经济封锁。

6.Only when those conditions are met would he consider lifting the embargo.

只有满足这些条件他才会考虑取消禁运。

7.He strongly backs the embargo.

他强烈支持禁运。

8.In his speeches he made few references to the United States and its embargo.

他在演说中他很少提及美国以及美国的经济封锁。

9.The embargo on arms sales was intended to prevent violence in the region.

对武器销售的禁运旨在防止该地区的暴力。

10.An embargo on oil exports has led to rising prices worldwide.

对石油出口的禁运导致全球价格上涨。

11.The government imposed an embargo on all trade with the country due to human rights violations.

由于人权侵犯，政府对该国实施了禁运。

12.The United Nations voted to lift the embargo after the conflict was resolved.

联合国在冲突解决后投票决定解除禁运。

13.As a result of the embargo, many businesses faced financial difficulties.

由于禁运，许多企业面临财务困难。

作文

An embargo is a powerful tool used by governments and international organizations to regulate trade and political relations. It is essentially a prohibition on trade with a specific country or group of countries. The reasons for imposing an embargo can vary widely, ranging from political disagreements to humanitarian concerns. Understanding the implications of an embargo is crucial for both policymakers and the general public, as it can significantly affect economies and international relations.One of the most notable examples of an embargo in recent history is the United States' embargo against Cuba, which began in the early 1960s. This embargo was imposed in response to Cuba's alignment with the Soviet Union during the Cold War, and it aimed to isolate the Cuban government economically and politically. The embargo restricted the export of goods, services, and even financial aid to Cuba, resulting in significant economic hardships for the Cuban people.However, the effectiveness of such embargoes is often debated. Critics argue that they disproportionately affect ordinary citizens rather than the intended political leaders. In the case of the Cuban embargo, many believe that it has not succeeded in its goal of overthrowing the Castro regime but instead has fostered resentment among the Cuban population towards the United States.On the other hand, proponents of embargoes argue that they are essential for maintaining international norms and punishing countries that violate human rights or engage in aggressive military actions. For instance, the United Nations has imposed embargoes on countries like North Korea in response to their nuclear weapons program. These measures aim to pressure the regime into compliance with international laws and standards.The impact of an embargo extends beyond economics; it also affects diplomatic relations. Countries that impose embargoes may find themselves at odds with allies and trading partners, who may oppose such measures. This can lead to complex diplomatic negotiations and sometimes even military tensions. Therefore, the decision to impose an embargo is rarely taken lightly and often involves extensive deliberation and consideration of potential consequences.In conclusion, an embargo serves as a critical tool in international relations, reflecting a country's stance on various global issues. While it can be effective in achieving certain political objectives, it also raises ethical questions about the impact on innocent civilians and the broader implications for international diplomacy. As the world becomes increasingly interconnected, understanding the role and consequences of embargoes will remain vital for anyone interested in global affairs. The balance between enforcing international norms and protecting human rights continues to be a challenging aspect of foreign policy, making the study of embargoes a relevant and important area of inquiry.

禁运是政府和国际组织用来调节贸易和政治关系的一种强有力的工具。它本质上是一种对特定国家或国家群体进行贸易禁止的措施。实施禁运的原因可以广泛变化，从政治分歧到人道主义关切。理解禁运的影响对于政策制定者和公众来说至关重要，因为它可能显著影响经济和国际关系。最近历史上最显著的禁运例子之一是美国对古巴的禁运，该禁运始于20世纪60年代初。这项禁运是针对古巴在冷战期间与苏联结盟而实施的，旨在从经济和政治上孤立古巴政府。该禁运限制了对古巴的商品、服务甚至财政援助的出口，导致古巴人民面临严重的经济困境。然而，这种禁运的有效性常常受到争议。批评者认为，它们不成比例地影响普通公民，而不是预期的政治领导人。在古巴的禁运案例中，许多人认为它没有成功推翻卡斯特罗政权，反而在古巴人民中培养了对美国的怨恨。另一方面，禁运的支持者则认为，它们对于维护国际规范和惩罚侵犯人权或进行侵略军事行动的国家至关重要。例如，联合国对朝鲜实施了禁运，以回应其核武器计划。这些措施旨在迫使该政权遵守国际法律和标准。禁运的影响超越了经济；它还影响着外交关系。实施禁运的国家可能会发现自己与盟友和贸易伙伴之间存在分歧，这些国家可能会反对此类措施。这可能导致复杂的外交谈判，有时甚至会引发军事紧张。因此，决定实施禁运往往不是轻易做出的，通常涉及广泛的审议和对潜在后果的考虑。总之，禁运作为国际关系中的关键工具，反映了一个国家在各种全球问题上的立场。虽然它在实现某些政治目标方面可能有效，但它也引发了关于对无辜平民影响的伦理问题，以及对国际外交更广泛影响的思考。随着世界日益相互联系，理解禁运的作用和后果将继续对任何关注全球事务的人至关重要。在执行国际规范和保护人权之间的平衡仍然是外交政策的一个挑战，使对禁运的研究成为一个相关且重要的探讨领域。