impoundment control act

简明释义

共同管理法［美国预算］

英英释义

例句

1.Under the impoundment control act, the president must notify Congress before withholding funds.

根据扣押控制法案，总统在扣留资金之前必须通知国会。

2.Many lawmakers believe that the impoundment control act strengthens congressional oversight.

许多立法者认为扣押控制法案加强了国会的监督权。

3.A recent court ruling emphasized the importance of the impoundment control act in protecting appropriated funds.

最近的一项法院裁决强调了扣押控制法案在保护拨款资金方面的重要性。

4.The impoundment control act was enacted to limit the executive branch's power over budgetary decisions.

扣押控制法案的制定旨在限制行政部门对预算决策的权力。

5.The budget committee reviewed the implications of the impoundment control act on federal funding.

预算委员会审查了扣押控制法案对联邦资金的影响。

作文

The Impoundment Control Act of 1974 is a significant piece of legislation in the United States that was designed to limit the power of the President regarding the withholding of funds that Congress has appropriated. This act emerged from concerns about executive overreach and the need for greater accountability in government spending. The Impoundment Control Act specifically requires the President to notify Congress when he or she intends to withhold funds, and it establishes a process for Congress to disapprove such actions. One of the main reasons for the introduction of the Impoundment Control Act was the increasing trend of presidents impounding funds as a means of controlling federal spending without legislative approval. For instance, in the early 1970s, President Nixon withheld funds that had been appropriated by Congress for various programs, which raised alarms among lawmakers about the potential for abuse of power. The act aimed to restore the balance of power between the legislative and executive branches, ensuring that elected representatives have a say in how taxpayer dollars are spent.The Impoundment Control Act outlines two types of impoundments: mandatory and discretionary. Mandatory impoundments occur when the law requires the President to spend money on specific programs, whereas discretionary impoundments happen when the President chooses not to spend appropriated funds. The act mandates that any proposed impoundment must be reported to Congress within a specific timeframe, allowing legislators the opportunity to respond. If Congress disapproves of the impoundment, they can pass a resolution to require the release of the funds.This legislation has had a lasting impact on the relationship between the executive and legislative branches. It serves as a reminder of the importance of checks and balances in a democratic system. By requiring transparency and accountability, the Impoundment Control Act helps to ensure that the executive branch cannot unilaterally decide how public funds are utilized. This is particularly crucial in times of economic uncertainty, where funding decisions can have wide-reaching implications for social programs and public services.However, the Impoundment Control Act has faced challenges and criticisms over the years. Some argue that it can hinder the President's ability to manage the budget effectively and respond to changing circumstances. Others believe that it does not go far enough in preventing potential abuses of power. Despite these criticisms, the act remains an essential tool for maintaining legislative oversight over federal spending.In conclusion, the Impoundment Control Act plays a vital role in the functioning of the U.S. government by promoting accountability and transparency in the use of public funds. It reflects the ongoing struggle to maintain a balance of power between the branches of government, ensuring that no single entity can wield excessive control over financial resources. Understanding the implications of the Impoundment Control Act is crucial for anyone interested in American politics and governance, as it highlights the complexities of budgetary authority and the importance of legislative oversight in a democratic society.

1974年的拨款控制法是美国一项重要的立法，旨在限制总统对国会已拨款资金的扣留权力。这项法律源于对行政权力过度扩张的担忧，以及对政府支出更大问责制的需求。拨款控制法特别要求总统在打算扣留资金时通知国会，并建立了一个让国会可以否决这种行为的程序。引入拨款控制法的主要原因之一是总统越来越倾向于通过扣留资金来控制联邦支出，而无需立法批准。例如，在1970年代初，尼克松总统扣留了国会为各种项目拨款的资金，这引发了立法者对权力滥用潜在风险的警觉。该法案旨在恢复立法和行政部门之间的权力平衡，确保民选代表能够参与纳税人资金的使用。拨款控制法概述了两种类型的扣留：强制性扣留和自由裁量扣留。强制性扣留发生在法律要求总统在特定项目上支出资金时，而自由裁量扣留则发生在总统选择不支出已拨款资金时。该法案规定，任何拟议的扣留必须在特定时间内报告给国会，使立法者有机会作出回应。如果国会不同意该扣留，他们可以通过决议要求释放资金。这项立法对行政和立法部门之间的关系产生了持久影响。它提醒人们在民主制度中制衡的重要性。通过要求透明和问责，拨款控制法帮助确保行政部门不能单方面决定公共资金的使用。这在经济不确定时期尤为重要，因为资金决策可能对社会项目和公共服务产生广泛影响。然而，拨款控制法多年来面临挑战和批评。一些人认为，它可能妨碍总统有效管理预算和应对变化的能力。另一些人则认为，它在防止潜在的权力滥用方面并不够充分。尽管存在这些批评，该法案仍然是维护国会对联邦支出监督的重要工具。总之，拨款控制法在美国政府运作中发挥着至关重要的作用，促进了公共资金使用的问责和透明。它反映了在政府各部门之间保持权力平衡的持续斗争，确保没有单一实体能够对财务资源施加过度控制。理解拨款控制法的影响对于任何对美国政治和治理感兴趣的人来说都是至关重要的，因为它突显了预算权威的复杂性以及在民主社会中立法监督的重要性。