deontological

简明释义

英[/ˌdiːɒnˈtɒlədʒɪkəl/]美[/ˌdiːɒnˈtɒlədʒɪkəl/]

义务论式的

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.Namely, Both of mem appealed to the deontological theory of Kant as the underlying basis of their theories.

除了分歧外，二人理论还有共同点，即二人都以康德的义务论为其哲学基础。

2.Classic utilitarianism is consequentialist as opposed to deontological because of what it denies.

古典功利主义的后果论，而不是因为它否认义务论。

3.Namely, Both of mem appealed to the deontological theory of Kant as the underlying basis of their theories.

除了分歧外，二人理论还有共同点，即二人都以康德的义务论为其哲学基础。

4.A deontological 义务论的 framework helps to clarify the responsibilities of professionals in various fields.

一个deontological义务论的框架有助于明确各个领域专业人士的责任。

5.In medical ethics, a deontological 义务论的 perspective might prioritize patient autonomy above all else.

在医学伦理中，deontological义务论的观点可能优先考虑患者的自主权。

6.Many philosophers argue that a deontological 义务论的 approach is essential for establishing universal moral laws.

许多哲学家认为，deontological义务论的方法对于建立普遍的道德法则至关重要。

7.In a legal context, judges often face deontological 义务论的 dilemmas when deciding cases that involve moral principles.

在法律背景下，法官常常面临涉及道德原则的deontological义务论的困境。

8.The company's code of ethics is based on deontological 义务论的 principles, emphasizing duty over consequences.

公司的伦理规范基于deontological义务论的原则，强调责任而非后果。

作文

In the realm of ethics, various theories guide our understanding of what constitutes right and wrong. One such theory is known as deontological ethics. This approach emphasizes the importance of duty and adherence to rules in determining moral actions. Unlike consequentialism, which focuses on the outcomes of actions, deontological ethics asserts that certain actions are inherently right or wrong, regardless of their consequences. This perspective can be traced back to the philosopher Immanuel Kant, who argued that moral principles should be universal and applicable to all rational beings. To illustrate the concept of deontological ethics, consider the example of lying. A deontological ethicist would argue that lying is wrong, even if it might lead to a better outcome in a specific situation. For instance, if telling a lie could save someone's feelings or prevent harm, a deontological approach would still maintain that the act of lying itself is morally unacceptable. This strict adherence to duty can sometimes lead to challenging moral dilemmas, as individuals must navigate between their obligations and the potential consequences of their actions.Moreover, the deontological framework is often applied in discussions surrounding human rights and justice. Advocates of this ethical theory emphasize that every individual possesses certain rights that must be respected, regardless of the situation. For example, the right to life is considered a fundamental principle that should not be violated under any circumstances. This unwavering commitment to duty and rights can foster a sense of moral clarity, guiding individuals in their decision-making processes.However, critics of deontological ethics argue that it can be overly rigid and may not account for the complexities of real-life situations. They contend that adhering strictly to moral rules can result in outcomes that seem unjust or harmful. For instance, if a deontological ethicist refuses to lie in a situation where doing so could save a life, the consequences of their adherence to duty could be seen as morally problematic. This critique highlights the tension between duty and the practical implications of moral choices, prompting ongoing debates within ethical philosophy.Despite these criticisms, deontological ethics remains a significant framework for understanding morality. It challenges individuals to consider the principles underlying their actions and to recognize the inherent value of certain duties. By emphasizing the importance of moral obligations, deontological ethics encourages a thoughtful examination of how we interact with others and the responsibilities we hold within society.In conclusion, deontological ethics offers a compelling perspective on moral philosophy, focusing on the inherent rightness or wrongness of actions rather than their consequences. While it presents challenges in its application, this ethical theory serves as a crucial reminder of the importance of duty and moral principles in guiding our behavior. As we navigate the complexities of ethical decision-making, the insights provided by deontological ethics can enrich our understanding of morality and help us strive for a more just and principled society.

在伦理学的领域中，各种理论指导着我们对什么构成正确与错误的理解。其中一种理论被称为义务论伦理学。这种方法强调在确定道德行为时，责任和遵循规则的重要性。与关注行为结果的结果主义不同，义务论伦理学主张某些行为本质上是对的或错的，无论其后果如何。这一观点可以追溯到哲学家伊曼纽尔·康德，他认为道德原则应当是普遍的，并适用于所有理性存在。为了说明义务论伦理学的概念，考虑一个谎言的例子。一位义务论伦理学家会认为撒谎是错误的，即使它可能在特定情况下导致更好的结果。例如，如果说谎可以保护某人的感情或防止伤害，义务论的方法仍然会坚持撒谎这一行为本身在道德上是不可接受的。这种对责任的严格遵守有时会导致具有挑战性的道德困境，因为个人必须在他们的义务和行为的潜在后果之间进行权衡。此外，义务论框架常常应用于围绕人权和正义的讨论。该伦理理论的倡导者强调，每个人都拥有某些权利，这些权利必须得到尊重，无论情况如何。例如，生存权被视为一项基本原则，在任何情况下都不应被侵犯。这种对责任和权利的不动摇承诺可以培养出一种道德清晰感，引导个人在决策过程中。然而，义务论伦理学的批评者认为，它可能过于僵化，可能无法考虑现实生活情况的复杂性。他们认为，严格遵守道德规则可能导致看似不公正或有害的结果。例如，如果一位义务论伦理学家拒绝在一个撒谎可以拯救生命的情况下说谎，那么他们对责任的坚持可能被视为在道德上有问题。这一批评突显了责任与道德选择实际影响之间的紧张关系，促使伦理哲学内部的持续辩论。尽管存在这些批评，义务论伦理学仍然是理解道德的重要框架。它挑战个人思考其行为背后的原则，并认识到某些责任的固有价值。通过强调道德义务的重要性，义务论伦理学鼓励人们深入审视我们如何与他人互动以及我们在社会中所承担的责任。总之，义务论伦理学提供了一个引人注目的道德哲学视角，关注行为的固有正当性或错误性，而不是其后果。尽管在应用中存在挑战，这一伦理理论作为一个关键提醒，强调了责任和道德原则在引导我们行为中的重要性。当我们在道德决策的复杂性中航行时，义务论伦理学所提供的见解可以丰富我们对道德的理解，并帮助我们努力追求一个更加公正和有原则的社会。